so many comments from uneducation to criminality.
tzz.
i had a talk with one of the agencies resimstock.com works.
image source say that in my case i had use RM content and they have authorisation for
infringement against antipiracy use.
I offer them 5$ for settlement because on deposit photos i have see similar images to this price.
They rejected 
How can it be that i can get images at starting price from 5$ or in this case up to hundreds $ for single image?
Are these in gold or platinium? Did picasso shoot them? Thats a shame, really.
Quite frankly i think they have no chance to convince the court that images at this price tags can be sold, maybe with exception to amateur users with too much money. On this basis they have no chance in their demands 

to loop,
thats not a very nice behave from you.
i try to keep my objective  level as i can in my situation.
i also dont understand how this conversation came to this point where im the badguy?
thanks to this group and other comments in the internet i think i have a distance view.
how many photographers had complain in this forum about not getting paid or too late?
ok getty and his allegiance do infringement, shutterstock withdraw money from customers on the behalf of auto renew wihout permission. And this goes and goes.
So by all respect every body should handle sometimes critic and the main difference between us is, im attacking no one like you do.
Final note: Then please prohibit google in his actions, if you can.

sorry ppdd but,
if i can get it on google without watermarks, then its for me legal.
google images and their search function is the same like on 'your agencies'.
main problem is that these agencies and photographers mislead customers on purpose.
For example in my country many people dont understand proper english, but on these sites
you have royalty free images (that leads to misunderstandings) or like in my case they invent licenses with absurd fees.
theres a big problem in this stock business

if they can go legal and they are, they must have show something,
but please can someone in god sake explain to me in a easy way
whats this whole matter with rights managed content?

hey guys quick update:
i was today out of office and our firm did get a letter from the procuratorial.
so my attorney went there to inform himself over the issue.
this firm had start a prosecution against us 
my lawyer told me that we had used a cultuca rm content for over 5,5 years.
and now they demanding over 1.800 � for settlement.
p.s. i remember that i took this picture with our web designer at that time from adidas turkeys page, because i thought it was kind a cool and hip.
all this is just a joke from now on for me, i told my lawyer to accept nothing 

hi, just speaking is worth nothing guys.
we had already charge them by law last week as they contacted us.
our lawyer took it really serious.
and its true, i do not found the threads from last week.
its not a hard nut if you are here in turkey.
wondering what they will say to the prosecuting attorney 
thats the most effective way and the only to finish this.
i'll be update you guys with the progression and before i forget hi bagnaz adam:)