pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dirtypainter

Pages: [1]
1
The easiest way to look at this is this.

The stock agencies are tools in our vast tool chest to promote our images for sale. the commission that they take is like a tool rental.

We as photographers own the copyrights we just use the companies to promote our images. Now in the cases of the stolen images being submitted the owner of the copyrights is the solely responsible for initiating claims of wrong doing. Also if the copyright owner wants to pursue the offending person in legal actions, he/she must be the one filling the claim or a lawyer in their behalf.

So the copyright owner needs to be vigil in keeping up with his images and where they may be used. This may seem daunting to alot that have large portfolios on many sites. But this is one of the choices that you made when you decided in going into stock photography.

2
I believe it is everybody's job the agencies, the contributors and the buyers.
We all have a vested interest in the companies that we use, and it would be wise for each of us when doing research on each of the sites to notify the company if we come across a set of images that might be suspicious. 

3
Off Topic / Re: Printroom
« on: April 04, 2008, 17:10 »
Adelaide,
I know nothing of Printroom but I use fotki.com for my event photo and have yet to hear any complaints.

4
Cameras / Lenses / Re: A few items for sale on ebay
« on: February 17, 2008, 12:04 »
Will the radio remotes also work with other brands of strobes?

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors