MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mnbvblah

Pages: [1]
1
But what you don't seem to be understanding is that if it is a 'routing issue' as seems likely - then the problem probably isn't at iStock.

But I'm sure that they'll be trying to find out where the problem is.

(Who do you blame if a letter goes missing? The senders?)

2
It's the 7th week now and the last word we heard from iStock was that it may be Canon cameras that are to blame

iStock (bitter) last wrote to the thread on the 13th. That's only 5 days ago - and including the holiday weekend.

They obviously have been taking the issue seriously.

3
No I don't work for iStock :)

But, in the first post on that thread which you linked to, there is reference to this probably being a routing issue. Which would certainly make sense. I've certainly experienced similar problems with other sites which were down to routing.

Routing issues are notoriously difficult to sort out quickly - somewhere between them and you there will be some computer which isn't working right. Someone brighter than me can probably point you towards a howto for route - tracing .... which would probably identify the point on the chain between them and you (or you and them - more significantly) which is causing the problem.

EDIT: somewhat ironically - I've been getting timing out issues with this forum over the past few days. The internets are like that.

4
It's just a temporary routing issue isn't it ? It'll get sorted.

Get out and shoot some great pictures whilst they fix it :)

5
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Who are they kidding?
« on: April 07, 2006, 06:02 »
Certainly SS is an interesting site and I know that it is well liked. I'm absolutely keeping an eye on it.

But currently - (and I know that things change all the time) - I think that the SS library has too much material which just doesn't look good enough and which makes the site seem less than serious.

Not to say that they have't also got some very useable images.

Maybe they should have a spring clean - and start accepting a few less images. Raise the bar, so to speak :)

6
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Who are they kidding?
« on: April 07, 2006, 04:57 »
Istock is unbelievable.  I submitted a series of 16 photos, all processed identically.  Istock takes half of them, says the other half have "artifacting" at full resolution.  What horsewater.  They're all fine, and every other site has taken them.

No wonder SS is overtaking them.  Who needs the aggravation?

I'm just not finding this. Most of what I submit gets accepted at iStock. Even some stuff which I've later rejected and deactivated myself. And looking back at the rejections I've had - well they all made good sense.

I'm not a member at Shutterstock. How do you mean that they are overtaking?

iStock gets better and better IMO.

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors