26
Shutterstock.com / Re: What a cool SS, how well he sells
« on: February 06, 2023, 07:08 »
Shutterstock is dead . Almost all sales are 0.10 cents per sale.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 26
Shutterstock.com / Re: What a cool SS, how well he sells« on: February 06, 2023, 07:08 »
Shutterstock is dead . Almost all sales are 0.10 cents per sale.
27
General Stock Discussion / Re: How Algorithms Work« on: November 25, 2022, 16:59 »Ah, I found it - this is what Roscoe sent me after the Indivstock thread was deleted:https://www.indivstock.com/members/support_feedback 28
Shutterstock.com / Re: Working together to lead the way with AI« on: October 25, 2022, 07:37 »
It is SS. so I expect: your photo of the happy young man on a mountain + my sky background combined to a new image= 33% of shared 0.01 USD commission for each.
29
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anything you would like to know about keywording?« on: September 21, 2022, 02:43 »
It would be interesting to know what to avoid. Excerpt from indivstock insights
Mutually exclusive descriptions, e.g: Winter and summer. Unclear description of what applies, spring and summer and autumn. Remove typical non-descriptive words like "high resolution, close up, seamless" if inappropriate. Remove untrue words like "seamless" if not seamless. If "young" but not applicable. If "tourists" but not a person. If "tourism" but not a typical tourist image. If "clouds" but not relevant. If "environment", "business", "concept" but not relevant. If "isolated" then not "background". If "artificial" for plants but not as title. If plural, but 1. If "garden" but only single plant. If single plant without name. Convert symbols such as paragraph, question mark to words. Remove "'and, the, with, in, at, of, ...". If "Europe" but not relevant. If "photography" but not relevant. If "architecture" but not thematic. If "decoration, decorative, antique, painting" but not applicable. If "amazing, aesthetic, ..." but not descriptive. If "beauty, beautyful,.." but neither woman, women, man, men, person, etc.". If "beauty, beautyful,..." but animal or plant". If "Close up images of, ...". If "Detailed, showing,...". If "Vector" but not vector. If "template" but not template. If "during, seen, view from..." but not matching. If "group" but not human or clearly "group". If "nature" but spam. 30
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock Free Collection question« on: September 18, 2022, 10:20 »
I see some of mine for this year are already listed?
i see the last year selected files if i filter for free. think the same is for you 31
123RF / Re: If you have work on 123RF PLEASE READ« on: September 13, 2022, 06:01 »this opt-out button ONLY affects future uploads. All images uploaded so far are opt-in. That's how it was for me and others. Without a support message, all your images remain in the unlimited download programme.Example September 1, 20220.03? from unlimited-download-PLUS? Horrible 32
123RF / Re: If you have work on 123RF PLEASE READ« on: September 13, 2022, 05:44 »Example September 1, 20220.03? from unlimited-download-PLUS? Horrible 33
123RF / Re: If you have work on 123RF PLEASE READ« on: August 31, 2022, 09:39 »
123rf is ignoring the problem.
2 weeks ago i sent the first message and 123rf replied. My files be willl moved from "PLUS" to "PREMIUM". So i dont give my images away to an unlimited downloads devil. After 1 week i ask again, a friendly and short message. Nothing happened. I still see ALL my photos are downlaodable with the "exciting" PLUS subscription. Anyone had success to get away from the PLUS-subscriptions? A bit annoying. 123rf.com/contributor/manage-content?tab=accepted 34
General Stock Discussion / Re: August AS Nomination 2nd Round Free Collection and more« on: August 26, 2022, 11:51 »
dashboard
35
Adobe Stock / Re: Insert DALL-E AI generated elements in picture« on: August 16, 2022, 05:26 »
The question is, are images from Shutterstock and Adobe etc scanned to create new images with. The answer is probably yes. There are some reports where the watermarks are incorporated. The whole issue is totally strange. What do Adobe and SS say about it? Is there an official statement?
36
Adobe Stock / Re: Insert DALL-E AI generated elements in picture« on: August 16, 2022, 05:24 »Same question regarding content created using Midjourney AI, we own the image rights so is it possible to sell on stock sites? they dont allow the usage for everything, usage is limited. 37
123RF / Re: "Exciting" news from 123rf« on: August 02, 2022, 06:33 »
need to opt out or all future uploads are in the free collection. is automatically opt in. sneaky
38
Panthermedia.net / Panthermedia no watermark« on: July 26, 2022, 22:01 »
the watermark has disappeared. Those who have images at Panthermedia everyone can download your photos for free with a right mouse click.
39
Dreamstime.com / Re: Unsold images now automatically moved to free section?« on: July 18, 2022, 14:07 »
this must be a big joke!
"automatically donated to the free section after 30 days from this email." Are they kidding? how can this be legal? 40
123RF / Re: No earning reports in 123RF since March 4, 2022?« on: July 14, 2022, 11:37 »
i earn only 25 EUR now a month from 123rf. Down from 400EUR a month, just 2 years ago.
And this month i think i have to make a payment to 123rf. Refunds from 2018.. Just crazy. And no explanation, or any information from them. It is like they dont care about a seller. Zero. Is not possible for me to upload any files anymore (since months), because it feels like rip off. 41
Adobe Stock / Re: Numbers significantly improving on Adobe Stock recently« on: June 23, 2022, 08:48 »
same, i love AS.
with SS i would need 5-10 times more dls to earn the same. so, no more uploads to SS. Is just too crazy. i love to support AS, with my uploads or a few free images for them. whatever AS wants, they can have it from me. 42
Adobe Stock / Re: 2022 Adobe Stock Free Collection nominations are now live« on: June 08, 2022, 11:57 »
photos selected only. will there be a selection round-2 again?
[/quote] Oh, got it. I don't know what the exact criteria is to qualify other than they cannot be assets with good sales in the past 12 months. It sounds like your eligible files meet that criteria. [/quote] 43
Adobe Stock / Re: 2022 Adobe Stock Free Collection nominations are now live« on: June 07, 2022, 13:18 »
only an extension of last year's files (and only photos in my case) .. not one uploaded this year, for example?
44
Shutterstock.com / Re: Contributor page's new design« on: June 02, 2022, 11:17 »
Screenshot pls. Still see the old design.
45
Shutterstock.com / Re: Contributor page's new design« on: May 27, 2022, 07:41 »
still have the old design i will be quiet do not want the change after your feedback lol
46
General Stock Discussion / Re: Etsy petition - NOT signing this!« on: November 18, 2021, 10:33 »
once the law is active, can't we all then earn more from legal warning letters than from microstock? We should already get together with lawyers. Let's get the money from Etsy and similar back!
48
Pond5 / Re: How has Pond5 been in 2021?« on: October 06, 2021, 16:27 »
mainly it`s good for videos, but still not for photos or?
49
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock Sales are so slow this days« on: October 06, 2021, 16:25 »
Very nice to re-check.
While I'm not seeing anything of parcicular concern on my end, I am interested in le 50
Software - General / Re: Fully automatic keywording in Xpiks« on: October 06, 2021, 12:15 »
is good. was good. now the free version is limited to 5 photos keywording
|
|