|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - eppic
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
76
« on: December 14, 2009, 22:50 »
I just checked my photocase account and my vast portfolio (5 images) and it turns out I got a sale last week for 2.16 euro on one of my images. It's a start.
77
« on: December 09, 2009, 22:07 »
I rake in hundreds of pennies every day; sometimes even thousands.
78
« on: December 06, 2009, 20:59 »
This site works pretty good on my LG Voyager on the Bell network. My desktop still cant log onto the new server so Im glad I still have the mobile option.
79
« on: December 03, 2009, 13:57 »
Congrats Warren! Ah yes I know that power plant Page. That one does have stock potential for pollution concept shots.
80
« on: December 03, 2009, 13:53 »
I believe I have a 1.9.2 copy. PM me
81
« on: December 02, 2009, 16:57 »
Ok so just after my previous post I placed a proper payout request. About an hour ago I got a payout email from Deposit Photos for 100.00 and this was confirmed by a paypal notification of funds received. I think that's about the fastest time I've ever gotten a payout from anybody.
82
« on: December 02, 2009, 05:42 »
My sales site will be "CrapStock" where only exclusive photos are license for $1 (pay 33c to artist) may not be hosted anywhere else, and are required to have proof of being rejected at, at least one of the big seven sites. I keep reading how rejects are best sellers, I want a piece of that! LOL! Or we could begin an image database where image ranking is based upon how many times a given image was rejected by one of the "big 6"; the more it was rejected, the higher the ranking!
83
« on: December 02, 2009, 05:38 »
Ah thanks Elvinstar!
84
« on: December 01, 2009, 20:19 »
I've got 520 files online with them now and just requested a payout. I didnt see a specific place to request a payout so I used the "Contact Us" form and used "Financial Questions" for a category.
85
« on: December 01, 2009, 20:09 »
Im over here too now; I was beginning to worry!
86
« on: December 01, 2009, 20:07 »
Funny since I got a similar email today but this one was "customer downloaded the wrong file"
87
« on: November 30, 2009, 21:22 »
I have a final batch in que which will give me a 500+ portfolio (barring no "lightning" rejections) and then I'll promptly request a payout.
88
« on: November 30, 2009, 21:17 »
That windows experience rating is quite interesting! I got a 5.9 as my disk data transfer is the 5.9 and lowest score.
Graphics and gaming are 6's and the other two, processor and RAM, are 7.4 and 7.6 respectively.
89
« on: November 29, 2009, 02:33 »
281
-----------
37958 total
90
« on: November 29, 2009, 02:30 »
Istock accounts for over half of my earnings, so I like Istock for that reason.
91
« on: November 28, 2009, 19:40 »
Oh yeah polish my lens girl! I've never seen a girl lick a lens like that before either.
92
« on: November 27, 2009, 00:49 »
The one thats really good is the +$180 add on, the nVidia GeForce GTX260 1792MB GDDR3. That's the exact Video Card that I have but it came installed on my Gateway. I'm running a 23" monitor with 1920x1080 resolution and it's been humming along very nicely for me; although the 12 gigs of RAM Im sure is also helping out there. I dont run Photoshop so unfortunately I can't comment on that software. Lightroom definitely runs faster now than it did on my old XP system with 4 gigs RAM and 512MB card.
93
« on: November 25, 2009, 00:44 »
Yeah now the whole reduced 30% comission for those who submitted their images tainted by microstock doesn't seem to make much sense anymore.
94
« on: November 24, 2009, 21:47 »
From what I understand there seems to be three levels of accepted images at Panther media. Lowest is the accepted image, second is the "recommended" and the top is the "Ed Tip", which has higher priority in the search engine and the "Ed Tip" designation is publicly viewable. The recommendation I believe also has higher search engine priority but the recommendation designation isn't publicly viewable.
95
« on: November 24, 2009, 21:45 »
well at 4 images so far, it's not much of a port to look at yet. My fireworks shot seems to have alot of an "interestingness" factor though.
96
« on: November 24, 2009, 20:03 »
Lol turns out that those 4 were the only ones accepted from the 22, so I guess I don't have them figured out like I thought I did. Back to my portfolio with my tail between my legs...
97
« on: November 24, 2009, 20:02 »
I find Panthermedia pretty good for accepting my images too. I also have a fair number of Editor Tips and Recommendations.
98
« on: November 24, 2009, 19:59 »
fotolia is completely different. only one photo was accepted out of a series of 4 similars with corresponding rejection reason. so, i sneaked one reject in a few weeks after the fact and...they remembered and rejected with 'similar' reason.
Drat! There goes my strategy for resubmitting rejects at Fotolia. Maybe I should wait a couple months first.
99
« on: November 24, 2009, 19:58 »
I love the OD's; such a nice reprieve from the paltry subscription royalties!
100
« on: November 23, 2009, 22:18 »
Did they really ever leave?
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
