|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - contrastaddict
26
« on: December 28, 2011, 18:40 »
^Definitely coherent, nice post.
27
« on: December 20, 2011, 22:38 »
hopefully lots of shoot, upload, repeat.
28
« on: December 17, 2011, 17:29 »
Awesome app! thank you.
29
« on: December 03, 2011, 22:15 »
Thanks for the reply, I changed my DNS to google's. That didn't fix the problem, but I got around to trying Firefox and i was able to login using Firefox. So I guess that will be the browser i'll be limited to for now. Wish chrome worked  . Either way, happy to finally be able to login on my windows comp.
30
« on: December 03, 2011, 14:22 »
Hey Guys,
I was wondering if anyone else was having this problem, or have had it before. I can't login to my istock account on my windows computer but I can on my mac. I've tried multiple browsers, emptying cookies and cache. Nothing seems to be working, I even had my brother try on his mac and it worked, but on his pc no dice. So windows is the problem. I sent a support ticket last night but of course I haven't heard back yet.
Thanks for any help.
Trevor.
31
« on: December 01, 2011, 12:35 »
32
« on: November 30, 2011, 21:19 »
"Starting tomorrow until Dec 7, this code will give you 15% off any purchase: 1979SUCKS."
33
« on: November 30, 2011, 18:36 »
"The lack of graphics on the 503 page is being caused by the other issues we're having right now. Working as fast as we can to get back up."
You couldn't make this stuff up.
34
« on: November 30, 2011, 18:23 »
On the last day of the month to, I was having solid sales today. This is such a joke, how is a site that earns millions of dollars a day unable to operate.
35
« on: October 29, 2011, 16:54 »
each week keeps getting worse and worse for me... i'm now down about 40% in weekly $ earnings from 'normal'.
could this be from increased competition? I don't see competition talked about to often on here, and was just curious what everyones take on it was.
37
« on: September 29, 2011, 09:55 »
I started out Nikon and switched to Canon because of the 5d mark II, Nikon doesn't have a camera in the same range megapixels, full frame for the money. The D700 just doesn't have enough, especially for stock in my opinion. I loved Nikon's focusing system though, if they had a competing camera with the mark II, I probably would have gone with it. Happy with both Canon and Nikon though.
38
« on: August 27, 2011, 14:26 »
Put some work up in the critique forums and learn from the feedback you receive.
39
« on: August 01, 2011, 13:55 »
down, down, down
40
« on: May 13, 2011, 18:51 »
I love how once again they completely ignored the V/A filter with yet another "we've been testing this" haha yeah, i bet they have.
41
« on: May 05, 2011, 13:23 »
I have always valued your forum posts as well, I wish you luck!
42
« on: October 01, 2010, 00:18 »
no shift in policy, post a few here at 100% so you can get some feedback.
43
« on: September 14, 2010, 16:50 »
A noticeable fall off of buyers from IS will never be seen, as much as some of you think that may happen. There are far to many buyers, Istock is worldwide and the amount of buyers is way to vast for these royalty changes to have any noticeable effect on istock sales. Istock knows this, its no secret. They aren't concerned about any fall out.
44
« on: September 07, 2010, 01:56 »
They used one of my stock images, I wonder if they used it legally  I suppose they did because of the size of it in the video. 
45
« on: April 30, 2010, 11:36 »
With all the problems during April, I was hoping the queue would have picked up by now but i sitll have images 9 days plus that don't fall into the bad day categories 14-16th etc. This is really frustrating, especially when they say they are working on it and the queue hasn't moved.
Im curious if non-exclusives are experiencing even longer delays?
46
« on: April 24, 2010, 15:23 »
Maybe I should have clarified a bit more on "didn't want to contribute to them anyway." Being new to stock photography, I didn't know much about it when I applied for an account. After some research, I found out what my work -mainly interested in wildlife- was better off with RM in a traditional stock agency like Alamy.
Ah, wildlife. Nature. Well, no wonder.
And for those of who contribute quality work to microstock, I have a question- why do it? You get an unfair payment for the time you spent in getting the shot. Those of you who say you do it for fun, not money- why not contribute your good works to macrostock, and not so good to micro?
I'm a masochist.
hahah.
47
« on: August 20, 2009, 03:33 »
I'm a full time college student, and shoot luxury homes and condo's freelance as a day job. But i'd like to make a career out of stock someday hopefully.
48
« on: April 28, 2009, 19:14 »
49
« on: May 16, 2008, 18:59 »
thanks for all the replies everyone, the info is much appreciated.
50
« on: May 15, 2008, 14:24 »
Thanks for the reply penelope.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
