|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Big Toe
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8
1
If such missiles had been supplied, Crimean Bridge would have already been destroyed.
According to the article, the missiles have been delivered earlier this month. So they may not yet have been deployed to the front.
3
« on: Yesterday at 11:04 »
How are we different from a herd of cows or rams? We are no different !!!
Speak for yourself!
4
« on: April 22, 2024, 16:41 »
but still the problem with the newspaper example is missing
Being nitpicky, and IANAL, maybe they're banking on 'permanance':
Under section 59(1) of the 1965 Act on Copyright and Related Rights (Gesetz ber Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte) (UrhG), it is permitted to "reproduce, distribute and communicate to the public, by means of painting, drawing, photography, or cinematography, works located permanently in public streets, ways, or public open spaces".
I have no idea. It's a can of worms.
According to Wikimedia:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany#Freedom_of_panorama
It's the sort of stuff that keeps lawyers in champagne, and scares the rest of us witless if we think about it for long enough.
No, the freedom of panorama (Panoramafreiheit) has nothing to do with the limits of editorial usage of photos, but is about commercial use. It means that the commercial use photos of buildings and pieces of art permanently located in a public space is not restricted by the protection of a buildings architecture or the copyright of a piece of art, like a statue. The commercial use can be prohibited due to other laws, though, for example, you cannot use a picture of a Mac Donalds restaurant commercially, because the golden M is protected as a trademark. The limits for editorial use are far wider. For example, pictures of the Wrapped Reichstag cannot be used commercially, because it was only wrapped temporarily, but photos of it could still be used editorially. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrapped_Reichstag
5
« on: April 21, 2024, 14:30 »
I could be wrong, but this just smells bad of frivolous lawsuit and something other than, illegal image use, or copyright infringing for showing the cover of a magazine, as an incidental part of a broader scene.
.
I am not so sure about that. Bild is frequently involved in lawsuits. They should have a bunch of lawyers working for them, who are experienced enough not to start a frivolous lawsuit, without any chance of success. Also, Bild as a newspaper uses editorial photos themselves all the time. They would hurt themselves if they helped set a precedence restriciting the use of editorial photos. My guess is that there may have been some photos where it is at least not absurd to assume that they might violate Bild's rights. Alamy may then have deleted all images featuring Bild as precautionary measure, even though probably only some of them have been a problem and are now trying to collect the money for the lawsuit from all the people whose photos have been deleted. This could probably successfully be contested in court, but who is going to sue them over 20 or even 100 or 200 Pounds or Euros? It is really hard to say without knowing more about what the lawsuit is actually about.
6
« on: April 11, 2024, 16:01 »
Zero Talent!
1. There cannot be public access to the works of authors.
2. Such works can be found on pirated sites, but Google does not search for them.
3. Not all of the authors works have been translated into English, and many have not been translated or digitized.
4. Nobody digitizes letters from authors.
5. I do not give away my sources of information.
6. Your opinion about me does not interest me. It's enough that I consider you a troll.
And I already said that if the digitization is done by the Russians, it means under the control of the KGB, which means you wont find such phrases on Russian sites. These phrases will be removed from the electronic text. Therefore, only a scanned copy of the original publication, which is more than 100 years old, can serve as proof.
A quote for which you cannot provide a source is worthless. It proves nothing. 85% of quotes on the Internet are made up. - Abraham Lincoln Going with this rule, some of the quotes on your list may even be true. The best lies have a grain of truth in them.
7
« on: March 27, 2024, 15:04 »
I've already clarified that these characters are not AI generated. I hired an artist to make me specific designs in high resolution with clean lines (which AI generated ones have a problem making... not to mention it's hard to make specific character design and posture you want)
I do also make AI generated images, but I always tick the box that are AI generated.
Ok, sorry, then I misunderstood you. I wonder whether the high resolution and clean lines are that important, though, if the character lacks details like mouth or nose. At least I can see neither.
8
« on: March 27, 2024, 12:44 »
Funny you ask... because there were many images and videos I've uploaded that I have no clue why would they be used and they have sold anyways.
It can happen, but I still think that a picture with a useful concept has a better chance of selling.
Concerning this picture: There are alot of little things that dsiturb me a bit about it. Not a lot of the picture is sharp, the girls or women somehow seem to be hovering over these plates or tiles and the proportions seem a bit weird. They miss a clearly defined mouth or nose and the breasts are overemphasized. The hands are weird.
Character has been used multiple times as animation and a part of an image in the past and has sold multiple times... so I doubt any of this would now matter. Now when I made figures of them they found a "problem"?
The image in question is AI generated, isn't it? My understanding is that when Adobe started accepting AI images, they accepted almost everything, even images with obvious flaws. Enough examples of that have been posted in this forum. Now they are swamped with mass produced AI images and can afford to be more selective or I should perhaps say that they cannot afford not to be more selective and images that would have been accepted a few months ago are now rejected.
9
« on: March 26, 2024, 21:14 »
Incidentally, French people don't necessarily have to learn English because they get on very well with the language in France. And in many other beautiful countries with friendly people:
Pupils in France still lern usually at least two foreign languages, the first one is in most cases English, the most widely chosen second language is Spanish, followed by German with a wide distance. Of course this does not mean that every adult in France actually speaks Englisch or another language, because the less you use a language the more you tend to forget.
10
« on: March 25, 2024, 15:51 »
Funny you ask... because there were many images and videos I've uploaded that I have no clue why would they be used and they have sold anyways. It can happen, but I still think that a picture with a useful concept has a better chance of selling. Concerning this picture: There are alot of little things that dsiturb me a bit about it. Not a lot of the picture is sharp, the girls or women somehow seem to be hovering over these plates or tiles and the proportions seem a bit weird. They miss a clearly defined mouth or nose and the breasts are overemphasized. The hands are weird.
11
« on: March 21, 2024, 16:06 »
12
« on: March 21, 2024, 15:07 »
Maybe gone fishing?
Or they are playing with toys in the attic.
13
« on: March 21, 2024, 14:18 »
dont be naive  but, great cgi trailer
Are you talking about Macron? 
He will soon put on a bicorne hat himself and start posing. Judging by his rhetoric.
But this is normal, the main thing is that his words are confirmed by his actions.
Are they, though? How come France comes in at place fourteen in the list of bilateral support (military and financial) then? Right between Finland and the Czech Republic. https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/
14
« on: March 19, 2024, 07:46 »
1. Whose Crimea? (the correct answer should be Crimea is Ukraine).
Have you ever asked your idol Trump that question?
15
« on: March 16, 2024, 08:52 »
so, first all the AI rants about it killing sales on AS, now attacking SS because they DON't accept AI??
It is not necessarily the same people who are complaining about the two things. Someone who does not do AI may complain about AI taking away sales at Adobe, while someone who does AI may complain about Shutterstock not accepting AI.
16
« on: March 15, 2024, 11:07 »
17
« on: March 14, 2024, 08:21 »
EU! Return Ukrainian refugees to Ukraine!
They are free to return to the Ukraine whenever they want. Of course, I understand that the European Union is happy that the Russians are waging war in Ukraine and thanks to this, the EU can solve its demographic problems and improve the economy through the labor of Ukrainians. This explains the supply of small quantities of weapons to Ukraine and trade with Russian EU countries.
Cheap Russian gas did more for hour economy than a few Ukrainians, most of whom don't work, anyway, could ever contribute. We are still supporting the Ukraine in its fight against the Russian invaders, because it is the right thing to do.
18
« on: March 11, 2024, 18:18 »
"Well, the milkman's a spy, and the grocer keeps on following me,
And the woman next door's an undercover for the K.G.B.,
Yes, you Germans know all this very well and are familiar. I think thats how it was in the GDR. It is very possible that the GDR will soon return to Germany again along with the KGB and Stasi. Then you will sing this song again.
No, I don't know that and I've lived here for a while.
The Kinks are a British band, by the way.
You probably didnt live in the GDR. When you live there, I think this song will be relevant to you.
The song is about people who see KGB agents where there aren't any.
19
« on: March 11, 2024, 12:40 »
I expected nothing less from fellow KGB agent Merkel. The Germans do not understand that Scholz is leading their country to occupation by Russian orcs.
A song that comes to mind: "Well, the milkman's a spy, and the grocer keeps on following me, And the woman next door's an undercover for the K.G.B., ... Oh there ain't no cure for acute schizophrenia disease." The Kinks, Acute Schizophrenia Paranoia Blues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFd4WBnOBv4
20
« on: February 26, 2024, 14:17 »
Editorial images are images that can only used for editorial uses, like for example to illustrate a newspaper article and must not be used for advertisment. They also should NOT be altered in a way that compromises their editorial value
I bet that's what you meant? 
Yes, thanks, that is indeed what I meant, I amended my post accordingly.
21
« on: February 25, 2024, 21:08 »
I know people here care and we're at the mercy of the agencies, but if the customers go to Adobe, and SS has much more profitable business gains in AI, news, or whatever else they own and do, they won't care about a division that's losing money. If it's too expensive to operate and unprofitable, they could shut down stock photos, as a cost cutting, expense reduction, initiative.
What kind of business do they have that is not dependend on the stock photo business? When they shut down the stock photo business, the AI licencing business goes away as well. They may survive stagnation or even decline in the stock photo business, but without stock images (and videos etc.), they have no AI business.
22
« on: February 25, 2024, 13:51 »
...
There's still space for real and editorial, that AI can't make...
depends what you mean by editorial - for AS it's anything that needs a model release, even if it's not newsworthy - eg generic people in an office - here AI is an easy alternative
Editorial images are images that can only used for editorial uses, like for example to illustrate a newspaper article and must not be used for advertisment. They also should not be altered in a way that compromises their editorial value Generic people in an office with model releases are not editorial content. Where did you get the notion that for Adobe every image with people that need a model release is editorial?
23
« on: February 23, 2024, 10:06 »
Good news again but my last year bonus plan is already finished, I can't edit any photos in Lightroom right now, does I need to wait the next bonus code to work again ? Im confused.
The new code should already be there, if you qualified.
24
« on: February 23, 2024, 08:11 »
The easiest tool for copying is not ai but a normal camera.
In fact it is usually a lot faster to copy a bestselling image by just taking a similar picture.
It really depends on what is depicted in the bestseller. It is not so easy to copy a picture of a tropical beach with palm trees or of an iceberg, unless you somewhere near them or travel there anyway. Also customers and clients, if they really want to save money, they can just take pictures with their iphones. Including things like wood backgrounds, green grass and sky etc...a lot of the content that is ultrageneric is very, very easy to take yourself.
Even images of stuff that is seemingly available everywhere are no always that easy to copy. For example really clear blue sky with a nice cloud distribution does not occur as often as you might think. And if you want a specific type of clouds like cirrus clouds, you may have to wait a long time until you get an opportunity to get a really nice picture.
25
« on: February 21, 2024, 08:20 »
The Russians have begun the procedure to denounce the 1990 treaty with Germany.
As I understand it, the Russians are planning to occupy half of Germany.
Germans! Kick out your Scholz! Demand the transfer of Taurus missiles to Ukraine. Or prepare parking lots for Russian tanks.
I was in favor of sending Taurus missiles to the Ukraine, but if an invasion of Russian forces into Germany is imminent, I guess we better keep the missiles to ourselves, so that we have a chance to repel the invasion.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
