MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mantonino

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 23
126
Shapin up ok ...

127
Just found our bear on Animal Planet.


128
For a moment I was puzzled by seeing you calling a peacock your daughter. :D

LOL  Yeah you may have wanted to get me some professional help then.

129
I was just playing around finding some tear sheets for some upcoming marketing for my stock stuff and I thought I'd share some of my fun finds including: BHPhoto, Compusa/TigerDirect, The National Reporter and a book cover featuring our daughter!







130
The point I was trying to make in my earlier post is that I don't understand the business side of this decision. Images produced by "image factories" have very high sales potential....So why would an agency makes uploading inconvenient for their most selling contributors? If you try to improve the quality of your library, there are other ways to do that rather then alienate your top sellers.

I feel like I'm on loop but they are improving their bottom line with this move. Let's say Yuri uploads 1 image that is downloaded 10 times. The last 5 of those were at higher revenue.  Now let's say he instead uploaded 10 similars and each was downloaded once.  They were ALL downloaded at a lower revenue for both him and DT.  If people need 10 images, why not give them 10 higher ranked, better selling images that profit both Yuri (keeping him happy) and DT (good business move)?

I understand the flip side (well he's YURI!  He'll just produce 10 images that sell 10 times instead!) but buyers need a finite amount of images. If they need 10, they need 10 and we can only talk about 10, not 100.  It also alienates other sellers if they upload 10 photos on top of Yuri's business people and 5 minutes later he uploads another 25 on top of them.  It will discourage almost everyone else.  Now, I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing anymore but it's a legit reason for DT to protect some of the smaller sellers.

131
123RF / Re: New 123RF site design
« on: March 14, 2010, 21:26 »
Hi LostOne, currently our forums have indeed been removed from the site for the time being. Nonetheless, you may forward any feedback you may have to us via our discussion page on Facebook via http://www.facebook.com/123rffans#!/123rffans?v=app_2373072738 or you may also tweet to us via our twitter page at www.twitter.com/123rf .


How can we make FTP work with the new design?  It's been HORRIBLE to upload to for the last 2 weeks.

132
Ummm.... never mind:) I wasn't talking about myself, I thought that was pretty clear... But, if there is a need to become personal:)...  why do I have to lose my convenience  of being able to click through my stuff at once?

I explained the money of it above - and I have no need for it to be personal.  I thought I was answering your questions.

133
I am not sure what they are focusing on though....
Be logical. 20 per day is more than 7,000 per year, that is 70% of your current port over 5 years. Are you really throttled down with "only" 7,000 images per year, especially if you're working alone and not with an editing crew like Arcurs?

Monthly uploads:     191.36 average

You used to be able to do 1500 a month and you were doing 191.  Now you can do 600.  Either way it's not all that limiting.

134
Why would any agency choose to limit contributions from people who produce high quality highly sellable images?

The way I understand it, say Yuri (sorry Yuri) can produce 100 amazing images a day.  Well DT makes more money on higher level images, so do we.  So they'd rather have the BEST 20 from that day - they get to L2 faster and thus make everyone more money faster.

135
20 a day is plenty, even for a bulk contributor.  At first I said hey, what, don't limit the GOOD photographers - but then I thought that I've never been able to upload 7200 images.  This may truly affect 5-10 people in the world on the high end.

136
Software - General / Re: nvm
« on: March 12, 2010, 21:27 »
lol sorry I posted about something I had seen, wanted to give it a try first instead of asking and being all take-take-take.

137
New Sites - General / Re: thephotostorage.com shutting down
« on: March 12, 2010, 18:02 »
What's the 2010 list looking like so far?

Zymmetrical
Yay
StockXpert
ThePhotoStorage

Did I miss any?

Zymm is dead, TPS is dead and StockXpert is dead.  Is Yay officially dead?  Are Veer, Vivozoom and FeaturePics far behind?

138
Image Sleuth / Re: Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 12, 2010, 17:03 »
The real point is whether it's worth your time and energy. Those sites don't really pose a threat to your sales.

I agree - but the more we let people just get away with it because they can, the more they will.  Someone stealing a $0.50 cent candy bar doesn't pose a threat to the bottom line of the gas station either but they want to stop them so it doesn't happen again and again, no?  I was actually hoping to hand it off to someone more bored than I.  I posted and wanted to get back to work but ended up me doing it.

139
Image Sleuth / Re: Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 12, 2010, 10:10 »
Page not loading. Maybe we got em!
I can still get them easily.

Yeah - unfortunately the page came back up. I was hoping it was down because we got it ... guess not.

140
Image Sleuth / Re: Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 11, 2010, 22:07 »
Page not loading. Maybe we got em!

141
Software - General / nvm
« on: March 11, 2010, 16:20 »
Gonna try this myself first...will report

142
Cutcaster / Re: Site down?
« on: March 11, 2010, 12:41 »
For me as well. Just got 100 images uploaded...hope they get these issues resolved soon and I start seeing some sales. With 100 photos, I would expect to see at least ONE sale.

ROFL!

I think I have 110 PAGES of images - and not one sale in 6 months.

143
Shutterstock.com / Re: Fast Fast Fast reviews?
« on: March 10, 2010, 21:32 »
Just to keep the info flowing - my batch had no models at all - probably an easier review with no MR checks.

144
Image Sleuth / Re: Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 10, 2010, 20:51 »
Also sent to 123RF

145
Image Sleuth / Re: Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 10, 2010, 20:49 »
I contacted Google, MyPage site that hosts it and BGDNS (who I don't think will help).  Google was a good idea - I just did that one now.

146
Shutterstock.com / Re: Fast Fast Fast reviews?
« on: March 10, 2010, 19:04 »
Submitted at 3:23pm, accepted 6:23 pm.  Fast!

147
Image Sleuth / Re: Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 10, 2010, 12:43 »
That was hard!  I contacted the site that hosts them but the "verification code" was a question about Bulgaria!  what?! lol

148
Image Sleuth / Stolen images on a foreign site?
« on: March 10, 2010, 11:43 »
http://gsm-kartinki.com/categories.php?cat_id=20

I see mine on there - I see a lot of familiar stuff.

149
Yeah I've used buddypress before but the installations I used were removed from the sites I had them on.  It's not tough if you're familiar with WP. 

BTW I meant Ning not Zing but I can never remember that domain.

150
Wordpress Multi-user with buddypress?

Or start a zing.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 23

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors