MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chromaco

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16]
376
Thank you to all for your responses. Just to be clear I was not offended by the suggestion I was a plant. Seems like that sort of thing has happened before. I also immediately cleared it up.
I've read everything here for the last month- Its not real practical to go back 3 years to try to figure out what happened in the past so I asked a few questions. I appreciate the time people gave in their responses.
I never claimed to be a rookie, just newly independent-- I just wanted to understand the rest of the community. This thing with Istock is very concerning and without some history those threads were hard to make sense of. Now I understand a bit better. I just had my first images accepted at Istock two days ago. I wanted to make sure I wasn't making a major mistake by uploading there as well.
I will take your advice and proceed in my own direction at a cautious pace. At least now I can make informed decisions.

377
I'm newly independent and asked a few questions yesterday to try to get up to speed. Thank you to everyone who responded the result has been enlightening. Being brand new to most of these sites, but also being fairly successful with my portfolio as an exclusive gives me perhaps a unique perspective on this situation and I see a bit of a silver lining.

Here it is. Despite what you think, THE SITES NEED YOU! This is why.
You say the new contributors are coming in droves -- I say they are being discouraged in droves.
It seems to be very hard to get images accepted. The upload process is complicated and time consuming and when you do get accepted you get $.25 for your effort. Anyone who is new is going to upload 20-50 images and have 50% rejected if they are lucky. At the end of the 1st month they will look at their income and see it is $2.50 for the 15 or more hours they put in and decide not to upload anymore. And then there is the very big assumption that those accepted files are going to even be marketable.

The only contributors really worth anything to the sites are the ones who already have portfolios. The sites are doing everything they can to keep new contributors out of the market. Why would you start now? Unless you already have a job or it is a hobby, it doesn't make any sense. If this is a hobby then you can't contribute the quantity that the sites need to keep the product fresh and odds are your quality/marketability isn't as good as the guys who have been doing it for a while.

If you guys with established portfolios were to pick one agency and give them your 300 best selling images and leave the rest where they are it would have a huge impact on the market. 2000 contributors at 300 images is 600,000 images. Not a lot of images but they are the 600k best images in the market all in one place. Where do you think the buyers are going to go? The place with a lot of images that are mediocre or the one site with all the quality? I realize that this may be unrealistic but think what would happen if a site lost it's 600k best selling images in the same month.

The sites may not realize it right now but down the road its you guys they need.
Like I said I'm new and there is a lot I don't understand but I know this... microstock is not easy, and those of you who have figured it out are a lot more important than you think.

378
This is how these things get off topic.
I'm sure I'm not the only one confused at where to upload and where not to. In the last two hours there have been posts 100% for deposit photos and 100% against. Seems like Istock is destroying the entire industry and Yaymicro is going out of business... and then not.

This is why I asked for some clarification. I'm not trying to take advantage but I do want to understand and be somewhat responsible in my uploading with regards to the rest of the community. I think unless you have been here for a while making sense of all this is very difficult.

Thank you for indulging a confused new guy.

379
I changed my name when I went non exclusive based on my accountants advice. Here is my page
http://www.dreamstime.com/Crowvb_info
I am not a plant just a new guy trying to understand. You can find me on SS and 123 as well.

380
Thank you, This is what I pretty much what I thought. Just a couple more questions.

1)Why wouldn't Istock keep the best images at home and send the weaker images off to the other sites regardless of exclusivity. In theory this would benefit both Istock and the more talented contributors. Istock would have an exceptional product and the contributors wouldn't be competing in the search against a lot of poor images.

2) Is Istock still in the top 4 and a must have for a new contributor without much of a portfolio?

381
As a newly independent contributor (exclusive at DT From Dec 2008 to July 2011) I am new to MSG and all of the other sites. I have been reading almost everything posted in the last month and am trying to learn. But I feel like I need someone to catch me up. I don't quite understand all the chaos with this Istock thing and the current threads are very confusing to someone who doesn't have the history. Maybe someone could answer a few questions to get me up to speed?
I would appreciate it. Please pardon my cluelessness but I bet I'm not the only one.

1) Why would anyone be exclusive with Istock? Are there incentives that are so great that you wouldn't want to maximize your exposure by selling on other sites?

2) Why is the PP program so bad? Once again wouldn't you want to increase your potential customer base?

3) I get a very good RPD from DT but still most of the sales are subs. I have also had good success in the last two weeks with SS which are all subs. How is what Istock is doing with the PP different?

4) There must have been something in the past that made Istock the obvious choice for contributors that isn't there anymore... what was it?

I am not making judgements with these questions I just want to understand.
Thank you for clearing some of this up.

382
123RF / Re: New to 123RF. Initial thoughts.
« on: August 25, 2011, 21:44 »
Update--- turns out being a newbie and not navigating the site very well was the problem. Seems I uploaded those images twice without realizing it. Hence the refusals for similar. I need to apologize to 123RF. Thank you once again for the great service and your patience. You have generated a very happy new contributor.

383
123RF / Re: New to 123RF. Initial thoughts.
« on: August 25, 2011, 20:29 »
Thank you so much. I sent a message to support but I may have sent it to the wrong place. I will wait a few days and see what happens. I really appreciate you getting back so quickly. So far I have to say my experience with 123 has been very good. Better than average sales in the first ten days and great support. Thanks again!

384
123RF / Re: New to 123RF. Initial thoughts.
« on: August 25, 2011, 12:59 »
Please help me with "similar" rejections. I'm new to 123 as well. Started uploading vectors last week (about 10 per day). My first 40 images were all accepted (100%)
I just had all ten in one upload get rejected for "similar image". I only had 40 images in my port and none of the new images are close to the previous ones at all. Every one is a new style or composition. 3 of them are completely new subjects. I had a buffalo head rejected for similar yet there are no images of Buffalo's in my port.
My question is this?
Do I need to upload differently? How do I avoid this problem in the future?
Thank you - any feedback would be greatly appreciated

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors