MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RGebbiePhoto

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
101
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS Illustrator Test
« on: October 15, 2008, 14:08 »
After the recent best match mess, the question now is...

Is it WORTH it to try to get accepted at iStock as a vector artist? :)

Our next shot comes up at the beginning of November, and I'm watching vector artists break their exclusivity to try to gain back their share of the market...

So, all you artists that are currently there, did you see your sales plummet?? Or do you still feel this is the right "deal" to get into?

Appreciate your comments!

Gebbie

102
This copyright thing is getting beyond a joke. So what now ... the film producers have to run around and get approval for every isolated object in a set? The cups, the chairs, the vase, the flowers?

A joke??
Are you familiar with the advertisement business? Being a member of microstockgroup I would suspect you are! Then you should know that the movie industrie is the most lucrative advertisement business there is! Large companies like Coca Cola are lining up to have their product shown in the movies. It's called the "product placement industry".
Yes they  have to clear copyrights on all intellectual property visible in the movie!

You wanna know why I put images on a free site like SXC?
Because I want to build a reputation, I want to be a name in the graphic industrie. That's why they have to give me credit in return for a free image.
What do you think I am some kind of moron who has nothing better to do than spend his precious time working hard on his images and doesn't expect something in return?
I need to pay rent every month, and I would like to have some food now and then!

Sir,

Product placement works for name brand items.  A random shot from an extensive portfolio is clearly not product placement, unless you used those flowers SPECIFICALLY to "brand" your name to. 

I wish you much success with using your free sites.  However, remember.  You get what you pay for.

103
General Stock Discussion / Re: Watermarked images in many sites
« on: October 11, 2008, 16:56 »
Hmmm...
I think a well phrased email might take care of that...

"I noticed an image of mine on your website.  I also noticed that it has a company watermark on it, which means it wasn't paid for.  Squidoo has informed me that if you do not remove this image in a timely manner, the entire page that my image appears on will be locked and unviewable.  Now, I don't want to lock your blog down, so if you would be so kind as to remove the image, I would be happy to contact Squidoo and tell them you are in compliance.  Thank you very much!"

heh

104
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dont resubmit a pic
« on: October 09, 2008, 09:41 »
@iStock it's COMMON to get a pic to resubmit, only to have it rejected again for a different reason. They VERY RARELY take my resubmits.

I've never had a problem resubmitting to DT, whenI fix the problem they specify.

At each agency, every reviewer has a different eye. If you get the same reviewer, and you fix the problem they said, then there is nothing to stop the approval.
You get a different reviewer, they look for something else, and you get a decline.

Sorry you had this experience, but I haven't really heard of this issue with DT before.  Pardon me if I don't jump on your hysteria bandwagon :)

105
50 million dollar budget... Probably went over that by a good bit...
Actors, extras, writers, directors, script consultants, gaffers, film crew, location travel, makeup, film, assistants, transportation, trailers, accomodations, food, permits, licenses, props, and donuts for the crew...

I'd say, if you want to be paid for all of your images, then only list them with agencies/representatives that pay you when they are used.

Just add it to your tearsheet and keep on goin'.

106
Dreamstime.com / Re: why can't I find my images at dreamstime?
« on: October 04, 2008, 19:12 »
I've noticed the same with mine.  My last upload hasn't yet hit the new queue, and i can't find it with searches, but it's been up for almost a week.
I'm wondering if it's involved in the empty search bug they've been having...

107
Newbie Discussion / Re: Should uploading slow as sales slow?
« on: October 04, 2008, 14:27 »
I dont think Shutterstock is slow. I was accepted at 09/27/08 and my income has doubled. Ive had uploaded nearly 400 images on dreamstime last week, but had only 4 Downloads.

Apples to Oranges, you can't compare SS returns with ANY other site.  They've always been high volume. And you usually start getting sales from the time you upload your first image.

Other sites seem to be about portfolio exposure.  The more images you have in your port, the more sales start to come in regularly.

And, of course, it's all about QUALITY... if your images aren't as good as what is currently on the site, your images will sink to the bottom.  But a quality image will stand the test of time and stay up or near the top.

108
StockXpert.com / Re: I'm in to StockXpert. Yeeeehah!
« on: October 01, 2008, 15:46 »
IMO, and please, it's not meant to offend or harm...

If it took you so long to FINALLY get into StockXpert, then why bog them down with 1000 images that were taken when you COULDNL'T get in?

Why not just pick the best 100 from the last month or so, and start from here?  Because if you batch upload all the images from when you couldn't get in, and they reject 85% of them, you aren't going to have good feelings about the site, and you are going to want to complain.

Congratulations on getting in!

And good luck with growing your portfolio :)

Gebbie

109
Dreamstime.com / Re: Strange behavior from DT's admin
« on: October 01, 2008, 15:35 »
From DT forum: http://www.dreamstime.com/forumm_148_pg3
Message posted at 10/19/2004, 10:44:37 AM by Achilles - member is an admin  Quote  Originally posted by Jmsetzler:
 
Quoted Message:
My first idea is that graffiti done in public like this would automatically become public domain. The wall itself is nothing but a wall. It's not a building or any other piece of 'architecture' that would normally require a release of any kind.

What would be your suggestion for me to properly document this photo with releases?


No, if it's outdoor is not public domain. Modern sculptures populate most parks and they are the work of another artist. I am not questioning if graffiti should be considered as art or not, people can protect anything they want nowadays.
My suggestion is to have the model within your picture sign a model release and mention that he also gives you all rights regarding the painting. 

End Quote

110
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT is ahead of IS
« on: September 27, 2008, 19:02 »
(IS almost double after I started sending videos as exclusive to IS)

Just a question...  Can you go exclusive in video with iStock? I thought you had to be an exclusive artist.
And if you aren't an exclusive artist, don't you think you might be able to sell your videos on other sites, as well?

Just wondering...

111
Bigstock.com / Re: Is this the reason for slow sales at BigStock ??
« on: September 26, 2008, 17:05 »
BME for us, but we just crested 1000 images in our port.

112
I didn't work outside of the house.  Hubby got laid off two months after we started in Microstock. 
We're about nine months in, we're hoping to see livable income in the next 2-3 months :)  Wish us luck! lol

Gebbie

113
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 25, 2008, 03:10 »
LOL the image keeps changing! 

It started as some Wermz, like the one in my avitar.

Then it was a park scene, now it's a typewriter!!

ooOOOOooohhh I wonder what it will be next!!

I think it has something to do with a damaged placer link, the image I copied had multiples, then completely disappeared from the site.

Gebbie

114
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 24, 2008, 18:14 »
Interesting, that picture is not the original one I linked.  I wonder who it belongs to...?

Gebbie

115
Fourth time around, just a question.

Did you go to their forums and see any of the hundreds of threads from others that are knocking on the doors?

Your images look good from here.  But that's not what they asked for.  Three very different images, vary the subject matter.  That's repeated over and over.

Check out their forums, a lot of pinpointed advice there.

But as far as warning people, well, there's no real warning. They asked for a certain type of submission, you didn't follow their rules, so they declined you.  Try again in thirty days.  Happens all the time. 

I would try to do some isolated images, maybe even of the sport equipment in the pictures.  They just want to see that you have a variety in your portfolio. 

Good luck with your next submission!

116
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 22, 2008, 02:13 »
LOL no worries.

The werms are our mascots, I make them myself.  It was a real huge laugh when I pulled all of them up!

Thanks again!

Gebbie

117
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 21, 2008, 19:56 »
Keith,

The last 20 were reviewed.  While I LOVE this image:

I think sixteen copies of the image in my portfolio is a BIT much.
Also, there is still weird html stuff where the prices should be on most of the images when I pull them up.

Thank you for your help so far!  And, may I say, I admire the quick response from you. 

Gebbie

118
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 20, 2008, 18:59 »
Keith,

Forgive me for calling it a risk to upload to your site.  I did not mean that in a BEWARE type of way. I said it because your site is brand new and does not have the traffic, nor the sales to make it an educated or strategic jump. It is a speculation.

My formed impression of your site came from the review team, when they rejected our images.  AGAIN, I don't have any problem with the rejections. The images I selected were some of our better sellers at DT and SS.  But I am not here to whine about you not accepting them, I am merely stating that our styles do not compliment eachother. 

I currently manage 12 sites.  Not all of my images are accepted across the board.  And some images sell like hotcakes at one site, but get zero views on others.  And I'm ok with that, because I know people go to the sites that "feel" right to them.  If they like the site, the way it performs, then they choose to spend their dollars there.  And if a company knows their clients, they know what will sell. 

I know the quality of our images. I know there are sites that sell our work.  But I would never dare to insist that you take my images.  Not if they do not match what you sell.  Because then, your purpose is defeated.  You get a bad review from me, because your site doesn't move for my portfolio, and your customers complain because there are a ton of images that aren't even remotely what they might be interested in.

So, I will leave our account open with the few images that get approved, and maybe in a few months when there is more information on your company performance, I might revisit and see if our current images are more suited.

Again, I wish you nothing but success!

Gebbie

119
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 20, 2008, 17:29 »
Keith,

While I appreciate your concern, it was never my intention to ask you to change your review of our images. 

I am quite happy with the results I get from the images we have for sale.  There are some companies that quite definitely like our style, and we sell well with them.  There are other sites that don't sell very well, but the sales are consistant enough to keep me interested.

I have dropped sites that didn't work for us, I see no reason to have my images up at a site if they do not match the general feel that site is trying to achieve.

Like I said, no hard feelings, it's just not going to work for us at this time.

Zym was going to be one of the sites I speculated on, but not one of the ones I would count on.  I'm not one that demands sales within five days of my images going live on a site, and I understand the risks involved joining a new site.

I do wish you well, I'm sure you will be quite successful.  There is a great pool of talent already accepted at your site!

I have 20 images still locked up in the pending queue that I would like to have a resolution on.  Good or bad, I just would like an answer on them.

Oh, another thing, I noticed there is no delete key.  So now, I ask, how difficult is it to delete an image at Zym?

Interested in your reply :)

Gebbie

120
Yaymicro / Re: That does it. Closing account.
« on: September 18, 2008, 06:53 »
Yay was open for contributors to upload their images a few months ago.
The site was supposed to go "live" with advertising, etc, in the beginning of Sept.

You had two sales BEFORE THE SITE WAS LIVE TO THE PUBLIC.

I'd say that was pretty good.  But, if you want to pull your port, who am I to stop you?

Please pull your port immediately.  The less images there, the better chance for those of us who choose to speculate.

Thank you in advance!

121
Some sites require an application.  You submit your images, their team reviews them, and if they like your stuff, they approve you to submit at will.
Shutterstock typically takes a few tries to get in. At 30 days in between application submissions, it can be quite a long time.  iStock also requires an application to be submitted.  They also can take a few tries to get in.
StockXpert also can take a few tries to get in, before you can freely submit.

Other sites are just load and go.  There are very loose submission guidelines, and most all photos you submit will go up.  These sites are GREAT if you like to see your images online, however the sales at these sites tend to be quite slow compared to the sites that make you wait for approval.

Either way, I noticed our images started to move when I had about 250 up, but really started to get more regular sales when I hit 800 images online.

BigStock was real slow to get going, but now, as we approach 1000 images with them, the sales are now happening more and more regularly.

I can't say enough about the HUGE difference between iStock and Dreamstime.  Either ya love Elvis, or ya love the Beatles.  You can like em both, but you'll always favor one over the other.  Same with these two agencies.  Personally, Dreamstime is sharing the #1 spot with Shutterstock.  iStock places a dismal fifth.

You'll just have to load up your images, and see which sites prefer your style of photography.  Play with a couple, play with them all. It's your time, so you need to decide how you want to approach this.  Have a free weekend? All your images submitted to your main sites? Then go thru the forums, and choose a smaller site that you can speculate on.

But, for goodness sakes, do NOT expect your images to start selling like hotcakes immediately.  It takes a while to build a quality portfolio, and as much as you already know, there is always something new to learn.  Keep an open mind.

But these are our results. Your results will vary.

Oh, and remember, some sites lock in your images for a period of time, it's something YOU AGREE TO when you sign up.  Dreamstime and BigStock are two of them that make you do that.  Another is Albumo, but I would stay dead away from them. The lock in on your images there is FOUR HUNDRED days. And you do NOT see that until after you have registered and agreed to the site terms.

I'd also read a whole lot.  Check out the forum here and see what people think about the various sites.  You'll get a good feel for how the site is progressing, as well as get a feel for the admin, as some of the sites have specific people to monitor and answer questions from the forums.

Good luck, learn all you can, use your resources, and have fun :)

122
Yaymicro / Re: Did u know this?
« on: September 15, 2008, 17:14 »
I don't know why people complain about lack of sales when the site just came out of Beta fifteen days ago.

123
No, sorry, you must wait an entire 30 days before you can resubmit.

They require you to check the Illustration box as well as categorize them as illustrations only.

Good luck next month!

124
Zymmetrical.com / Re: Zymm rejections
« on: September 15, 2008, 13:08 »
The composition and lighting of this image limit its stock value.

This rejection reason hit the entire first batch i submitted. 

I understand what is right for one company isn't always right for another, but this was first batch of about a thousand available, and I did pick and choose.

So, my feeling is, if these images aren't good enough for your site, I just have more of the same, so I just can't see spending the time. 

No bad feelings, it's just not a good match.

125
123RF / Re: Nice surprise
« on: September 15, 2008, 12:51 »
If you float your mouse over the little abbreviations at the top, it shows what they mean...

*w is for web, etc..*

Hope that helps :)

Gebbie

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors