MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - melastmohican
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
51
« on: December 21, 2010, 16:50 »
Money earned in given tax year or money paid in this period of time? Some money might never be paid because contributor will not reach payout limit. Is is counted as income?
52
« on: October 26, 2010, 13:18 »
Should I stop uploading to low earning agencies and focus only on top ones since time investment does not justify return or I need to continue to struggle and upload in order to build larger portfolios which may produce better returns?
53
« on: September 21, 2010, 11:20 »
We are in 2/3 of this month and all my batches submitted this month are still in a queue. Are reviewers on vacations?
54
« on: August 17, 2010, 13:47 »
Today got email about expiration date for free credits they gave to me. I tried to buy my photos but it seems these credits are different than regular ones. When I try to make a purchase it claims that I do not have enough credits. Do they have a half value or I cannot do math?
55
« on: August 11, 2010, 12:33 »
I usually try second option but recently I tend to ignore cause same photos are sent and different sites got different criteria.
56
« on: June 25, 2010, 15:47 »
If this trend continues I will have worst result across the board. Summer or recession?
57
« on: June 17, 2010, 22:48 »
FYI. I got latest version yesterday and finally it can log in on Veer's FTP server.
Here is a version info: FileZilla Client ----------------
Version: 3.3.3
Build information: Compiled for: i686-apple-darwin9 Compiled on: i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 Build date: 2010-06-13 Compiled with: i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465) Compiler flags: -g -O2 -Wall -g -fexceptions
Linked against: wxWidgets: 2.8.11 GnuTLS: 2.8.3
Operating system: Name: Mac OS X (Darwin 10.4.0 i386) Version: 16.100
58
« on: June 17, 2010, 19:20 »
I am not a pro and I started with uploading my images to microstock. Recently I have been trying to get enrolled on some macro agencies and I have no idea how should I divide my work for micro and macro. Which subjects would do better if I do not send them to micro but set aside to upload them to macro later?
59
« on: June 17, 2010, 17:43 »
I have uploaded couple hundred images and every day they just automatically pick as many as limit allows and send to review. All I need to do is check every couple days and update few properties, assign partner programs, etc. If I could give the best workflow award this is it. I wonder when Alamy can figure out how to make FTP upload?
60
« on: June 06, 2010, 17:30 »
I am not talking about rotation by multiplication of 90 degrees but arbitrary number.
61
« on: May 17, 2010, 17:29 »
If this is a beginning they started from the oldest first.
62
« on: May 11, 2010, 13:00 »
I tried uploading after one year to see if anything has changed. Nothing.
63
« on: April 29, 2010, 15:55 »
The only thing that comes to my mind right now is this boxing analogy. SS is just dominating my results this month.
64
« on: April 19, 2010, 14:07 »
66
« on: April 01, 2010, 17:53 »
otherwise Shutterstock is the best. It seems to be a rule when I looked at result charts from different people.
67
« on: April 01, 2010, 13:26 »
Early last month the mayor of Topeka, Kansas stunned the world by announcing that his city was changing its name to Google. The unusual move is a response to Googles new Fiber for Communities program. Google is going to install new Internet connections in unannounced locations, giving those communities Internet speeds 100 times faster than those elsewhere, with data transfer rates faster than 1 gigabit per second. Mayor hoped the proclamation would catch Googles attention. Guess what, today Google officially changed its name to Topeka to honor this gesture. No info on which municipalities are chosen to participate in our experimental ultra-high-speed broadband project. http://melastmohican.net/wordpress/2010/04/01/google-changes-name-to-topeka/
68
« on: March 30, 2010, 14:51 »
Just got email today. It seems to be complicated if you compare to other footage sites. 1. You can now upload PAL SD, NTSC SD, and HD together through FTP. The system will unite the files under one file ID. 2. You can upload a model release/screenshot and a thumbnail for the file. 3. You can upload the title, description and keywords. 4. Naming conventions: There is a strict naming convention that must be followed when using FTP to upload your video files. Assuming that the original file is a 29.97 HD file named clouds, the files should be named: clouds_HD.mov clouds_NTSC.mov clouds_PAL.mov clouds_THUMB.jpg clouds_RELEASE.jpg clouds_META.txt 5. File folders: These files must be uploaded into a folder that you create on the FTP server named "clouds". 6. Once finished, rename folder. When all the files are in the folder and you are satisfied that everything is in order, you must rename the folder to "clouds_done". You do not need to rename the files themselves, just the folder. Our system will not attempt to process files that are outside of a folder, or in a folder that does not contain the word "done". In other words, you can take your time to upload all the parts to a particular folder, and we won't touch it until you have changed the name to xxxx_done. Once you have changed it, you won't have any time to add more files, so don't do this last step until you are certain that all is in order. If for some reason a file in the folder fails to process, the file folder will be renamed "xxxx_error" and the log note will be added to the folder for your information. You can fix the files accordingly, and once fixed, rename the folder to xxxx_done and it will try again. Rules and limitations 1. You still need to edit the file metadata in a browser after the upload is complete to add the categories and to check the radio buttons legal checklist. A file will not be considered fully uploaded until this is complete. Although we continue to explore ways to do this, there is no estimated date for this feature. 2. You cannot use FTP to upload the fullres versions of files already accepted as Proxies. If you are using the Proxy approval method, you must finish the upload through HTTP. 3. If you upload several files such as NTSC and PAL together and one file is rejected for any reason, then all the files must be reuploaded, since they are all linked by the file ID. Make sure you test the files before uploading them. 4. The thumbnail needs to be 380 pixels wide, and with the same aspect ratio as the original. With this in mind, if you upload HD, then the SD versions must be anamorphic (16:9 anamorphic pixel aspect ratio). 5. You may only upload one HD file. It should be the natural frame rate of the camera. 6. If no thumbnail is submitted, then a frame from the first second of the video will be selected by the system. 7. If no text file is included, or if the text file is not in the following format, then you will still have to add all the metadata through the HTTP interface. Metadata The following template must be used or the metadata will not be passed on with the file. The file must be .txt and must be strictly laid out according to line. Use commas to separate the keywords. Words with commas between them will be treated as a phrase. The file should not include the words " Line 1:" This is for clarity only. Line 1: Title Line 2: Description (make sure there are no line breaks). Line 3: Keyword 1, keyword 2, keyword 3, keyword 4, keyword 5, keyword 6, (make sure there are no line breaks). Line 4: "Yes" if the NTSC or PAL files are anamorphic. This sets the anamorphic switch, and is only effective on NTSC or PAL files. If you leave it blank or type in anything other than the word yes, SD files will be processed in a 4:3 frame, even if the file is anamorphic. This does not affect HD files even if HD files are included in the batch. Example: Fluffy Clouds Pink fluffy clouds float by in real time. clouds, sky, pink, fluffy, exterior, daylight, weather pattern, daydream, video yes The above example would be saved as clouds_META.txt and included in the clouds folder. These instructions will soon be available on the website. Meanwhile, when it is announced that the FTP service is up and running, you will have to start using this workflow. Once you login to the server, you should begin by organizing any files that are still sitting there into folders and begin to create the text files for the metadata. As a future workflow, you might consider creating the folder with all the elements on your computer, then uploading the whole thing. Just make sure you don't name the folder "done" until it is complete.
69
« on: March 22, 2010, 14:48 »
Today I got two emails (one was not enough and I only got account cause I am contributor) announcing new subscription plans: 6 months 1820 images $0.27 per image $499.00 6 months 12 months 3650 images $0.19 per image $699.00 12 months http://www.crestock.com/buy-credits-subscriptions.aspx
71
« on: March 19, 2010, 14:15 »
IStock got competition eliminated, got some new customers. Getty got some cost eliminated. Maybe other agencies also have similar benefits. Contributors got images left in void and lost some of their income.
72
« on: March 19, 2010, 13:29 »
"ImageRights , an Internet-based services company, helps locate and identify image use on the internet. ImageRights provides a low-cost, easy to use solution designed to help protect the copyrights of photographers, image libraries and publishers. ImageRights is applying visual search and image recognition technology to discover the use of photographs and illustrations across the Internet, empowering rights holders to reduce illegal image use and ultimately recover fees for the unlicensed use of their works. " In general similar idea to TinEye but you have to upload your images and pay them for storage. http://melastmohican.net/wordpress/2010/03/19/imagerights/
73
« on: March 18, 2010, 14:26 »
I think it's going to be very average. SS will be average and all other of my top agencies are going to be below average.
Note. YAY posted earning from last year's third party sales so huge number from them is misleading.
74
« on: March 18, 2010, 11:54 »
Looking at my portfolios at different agencies I noticed that there is not much similarity between them. There are very few images that are universally doing well across the board. Otherwise portfolio sizes, content, best sellers vary. If I try myself I would not create so different sets of images. For last two years I have been submitting same images everyday to couple agencies. There is no standard good photo prototype as the one we got for metre in Sevres :-) One agency claims photo has bad lighting, another that composition is bad, third dislikes description or keywords, fourth one likes everything and takes it. Next day it is opposite. First one likes the photo and others reject.
75
« on: March 12, 2010, 16:59 »
"The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare."
Would it apply to microstock?
Enough of contributors would give you a hit photo? In other words 1000 newbies, each can produce 1 "top micro-stocker" quality image but you do not have to pay them cause they would never reach payout limit. In meanwhile out top gun would 1000 images like that too but you have to share profits with him/her.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|