MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jsolie
151
« on: June 02, 2008, 19:12 »
May wasn't as good as April, mostly due to no EL sales... Not sure why I still upload to some agencies--perhaps my glasses still have some rose coloring in them...
The breakdown:
IS 35.31% BME SS 23.54% DT 9.74% 123RF 7.79% BME BigStock 7.44% BME StockXpert 7.13% FT 4.91% CS 2.33% BME SR 0.62% BME CanStockPhoto 0.62% BME SV 0.56% BME MP 0.00% FP 0.00% 100.00%
152
« on: May 30, 2008, 14:12 »
Did anybody NOT receive the email?
Affirmative--no email received. I clicked on the "exclusivity guestimator" once. Did you know that websites can laugh?
153
« on: May 28, 2008, 23:32 »
"Well there's your problem..." Congrats on making the front page!
154
« on: May 27, 2008, 15:01 »
Microstock>Complaints>Subject>Emotions>Intense>Distaste>Hatred:
Categories! Followed closely by categories. Next is categories. Then a whole bunch of categories. And finally, ending with categories.
Since Categories weren't an option, I selected Uploading, as categories selection is usually around the same time as uploading. One site in particular makes categories>selection>painful. Too bad there's not an option for "keyword editing after the photo is accepted." That's one I would have looked at and seriously considered clicking.
155
« on: May 23, 2008, 18:02 »
If it's flagged as "Can Resubmit" and I feel that making the effort will be worth it.
Sometimes images that IS rejects sell fine at other sites, and I don't feel a particular desire to re-edit and have different versions of my images floating around out there. Other times, I will make the effort, particularly if I think the image will sell well on IS.
If it's flagged "No-resubmit" I don't try sneaking the image back through the queue. I've got enough images lined up for upload that I don't need to be clogging the queue with stuff they already shot down.
156
« on: May 15, 2008, 19:21 »
Have you considered a reflector of some kind? 3 Bees are great, but if you put two on your background and one on your subject, you're might have to do something about "the shadow."
Also, those 13' stands, while nice and sturdy, don't let you get the light all that low. If you're trying to light something that's kind of low (either objects or small children), you'll have an interesting time in getting the light to the proper height.
157
« on: May 15, 2008, 12:23 »
Bottom rung of the ladder and struggling to climb.
158
« on: May 15, 2008, 12:19 »
It would kind of depend on what their intention with the shot is. If its something that's going to be displayed on a large product run, then you should definitely charge more than for something that's going to wind up as a small graphic on the company's internal intranet.
As for how much, I'm afraid that I won't be of much help, but price it like a commercial shoot--figure in your time for travel, set-up & tear-down, shooting, and editing. I've made more off of commercial shoots than I have off of stock.
159
« on: May 13, 2008, 12:42 »
One thing that slows me down is the pen tool--I just wish it could go quicker. Keywording can be pretty onerous, too. It'd be pretty cool if Lightroom had a metadata spell checker--that way I could catch things before final jpegs are produced.
160
« on: May 11, 2008, 19:25 »
You might want to fire off an email. I did after quite some time, and was accepted a short time later. I really shouldn't have had to do that, I wasn't sure if things were still in queue or if something had been overlooked. They did accept the majority of my admittedly small portfolio, though.
161
« on: May 11, 2008, 18:50 »
So I'm checking my stats last night across all the agencies I contribute to, and I get a page at StockRiot saying they're "adding some really cool hardware."
And there's this big pair of pliers above the message. I blink, and realize that I'm looking at MY set of pliers. Wow...first time I've spotted one of my shots in the wild.
Not sure how much longer it'll be there, though...
162
« on: May 03, 2008, 15:10 »
Yep, that's Istock Many times they need the keywords "disambiguated," probably so they keep their meaning in another language. I find the DeepMeta program to be a very valuable tool for working with my istock portfolio. One thing I like about DeepMeta is that you can tinker with keywords and categories on your online photos, especially if you miss something (or think of another relevant keyword). It also makes uploading very easy, provided that there's room left in your upload limit.
163
« on: May 02, 2008, 19:30 »
I don't think you'll be sorry with this lens. I use one quite a bit with my stuff. It isn't the widest, though, but for closeup stuff the lens is awesome.
164
« on: May 01, 2008, 18:17 »
SS 25.91% (74% of previous month) IS 25.06% (163% of previous month) BME StockXpert 19.75% (144% of previous month) BME DT 6.92% (42% of previous month) FT 13.93% (269% of previous month) BME (had an EL sale--woo hoo!) 123 5.58% (114% of previous month) BME CS 1.22% (prev month: 0) BME BigStock 1.62% (prev month: 0) BME
other sites were firmly at 0%: canstock, most, feature, snap, stockriot. I'm not counting yaymicro because they're not open yet.
Overall, April's the BME.
165
« on: April 30, 2008, 18:18 »
123RF and Crestock make it very easy to upload there. I'd be happier if there were more sales, but who wouldn't?
BigStock closes down their uploading about every other weekend it seems. When they disable uploading, I don't think you can even go into your queue and assign categories & such.
The ETR at Dreamstime usually isn't that thrashed, but it is an estimate of sorts.
166
« on: April 30, 2008, 17:39 »
Maybe he's bitter because he couldn't pass the 7/10 Shutterstock application.
If he were "bitter", he'd be sitting in his office laughing his hind end off at such a thing... *snerk*
167
« on: April 26, 2008, 15:36 »
It will be custom built. Desktop. No less than 4gb of memory. the guy in the shop recommended me to install XP but perhaps you are right about XP having a short future...
XP is certainly fully capable and uses less system resources than Vista, just know that you'll have to run a 64-bit version of either OS to see your 4th+ GB of memory.. Since your machine will be new there should be pretty good driver support for Vista. It was a bit tricky over a year ago building a Vista machine as several components didn't have drivers available yet. I think one of the last drivers I had to wait for were Epson's 64-bit drivers for the R2400.
168
« on: April 26, 2008, 00:38 »
Will you recommend to install Vista or XP in a new computer?
How new of a computer? Did you build it yourself, or is it a pre-assembled one? Is it a desktop or laptop, and how much memory? My laptop runs vista (in 32-bit mode)...it drives me up a wall when the hard drive starts running for no reason--even after getting the memory up to 3GB. My wife runs the 64-bit version of Vista on a machine I built last year--4GB of memory, dedicated hard drives & such. Vista doesn't bother her at all. At my day job, the machine I use runs XP. At some point MS is going to stop supporting XP, and then you'll have to decide on whether to just keep running, or upgrade to whatever the latest version of Windows is. Or you can avoid a future OS reload (and PS with all your plugins, etc) by going with Vista now. But it'll drive you bats with how much memory it consumes just to present you with a UI, and by how often the hard drive just mysteriously becomes busy. At least PS runs fine.
169
« on: April 24, 2008, 14:51 »
The only problem I had with CS2 on Vista was the annoying "Register now" popup. After I ran PS by right-clicking on the icon and choosing "Run as Administrator" it was able to stop that. Also had to do this so a couple of my plugins would accept their registration codes. Other than that, no major problems. It's since been upgraded to CS3 which went without a problem.
170
« on: April 24, 2008, 14:44 »
I uploaded my images too. They have a very friendly/positive/helpful attitude at YAY Micro. They listening very well to the suggestion in the forum. Problems are attacked and resolved limitedly. I can't wait for them to open the doors in June.
Agree completely. Their upload process is not a painful one. It will definitely be interesting to see what happens once they do open up.
171
« on: April 22, 2008, 19:00 »
The "five-at-a-time" and then "better hurry or it'll time out and you'll have to re-send the files" editing does tend to get a bit onerous. I did persevere and uploaded 150+ photos last night. Where's that smiley for "gone cross-eyed?"
FTP would certainly make it easier. Faster review time would make it even more easy. If I had to choose between FTP and quicker reviews, I'd take the quicker reviews.
172
« on: April 22, 2008, 18:52 »
173
« on: April 22, 2008, 14:52 »
I just got the same rejection--over abundance. But it wasn't for an isolation. I'm wondering if a) new reviewer, or b) new reason for reviewers to select from.
174
« on: April 22, 2008, 14:48 »
Thanks for posting this! I'd been digging around looking for this info.
175
« on: April 22, 2008, 13:48 »
I see that Crestock gives away a free photo every day. Do photographers get paid for this? For every download?
Does Crestock select the photo, or do they choose from a pool of photos where photographers indicate "these are okay for free photo of the day"? no
another reason not to join crestock!
Their submission process is so smoooooth. I don't get as many sales there as I'd like, but it's just so easy to upload to them.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|