|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Magnum
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32
51
« on: September 09, 2010, 08:07 »
Its dont agree with Luissantos about noise. Its short depth of field and blur, but not much noise.
The other comments hes totally right about.
52
« on: September 08, 2010, 10:56 »
Has there been a reply to all this , or are we just throwing all we got without waiting and listening? Like said before here. lower percentage can actually be more cash than before. Depends on the sell price. Istock has always been paying the lowest percentage, and we all have raised them to the sky. No wonder they lower it even more 
53
« on: September 06, 2010, 14:32 »
Ha ha. me like 
54
« on: September 06, 2010, 14:27 »
Whats the problem with SS? Its like its a one person company with to much to do. Nothing happens?? Its really annoying having to log in all the time. I dont check or upload to SS like before, cause of this. SS sucks bad right now, and the income stays the same when all others increases..... Angry 
55
« on: August 26, 2010, 11:10 »
First photo: The guy with the red moustache laying on the ground looks a little seasick  Or maybe its the russian vodka...
56
« on: August 26, 2010, 09:12 »
My views on uploads from july 14th is zero. Never happen before.
Maybe a week before but not this long.
57
« on: August 25, 2010, 15:42 »
58
« on: August 25, 2010, 01:35 »
If they know about it they wont tell us anyways, because of masshysteria. Those who tries get killed.  Good thing is in the movie, the sky cleared already after a few month...
59
« on: August 21, 2010, 08:41 »
Did SS accept him 
60
« on: August 06, 2010, 17:00 »
Faingelina
61
« on: August 05, 2010, 06:11 »
Ill go check my Alamy account then...
62
« on: August 05, 2010, 01:37 »
How much is it? What about contracts? Did you make that image only for this, or was it a microstock image?
Is it wort the psycologic pain to keep trying and trying? You have probably put more time already into the money issue than into the shot?
63
« on: August 01, 2010, 09:48 »
I wish I had a talent for backgrounds like that. Dont know what Im doing wrong, it always ends up with a mess and frustration after two hours waste of time;) Great stuff
64
« on: July 31, 2010, 12:12 »
Awesome. There are so much more to do with the images youve got laying around. If you only think a bout it.
65
« on: July 31, 2010, 09:13 »
And what software used. Heres a 3d render of mine 3ds max 2011 / vray  Wireframe  And yes, its a pimping thread 
66
« on: July 26, 2010, 14:33 »
Reshoot is the best option. If its possible ofcourse. I wish I had that chance on a few shots myself, three years later and wiser  And its pretty hard to sell at all if its not accepted, Tom
67
« on: July 26, 2010, 14:12 »
Brighten the whole image, then you historybrush back the sky. Very likely there will be noise, I dont know how the original looks like.
68
« on: July 26, 2010, 13:13 »
Its a good shot so I would try to fix it. Stock agencies likes bright images, almost overexposed.
69
« on: July 23, 2010, 14:37 »
Memory cards are so cheap today, so I dont see the point really. And do you have that kind of usb in your camera house?
70
« on: July 15, 2010, 00:46 »
Ha ha ha awesome! Ive been waiting for someone to do something like this.
Its really needed.
I might have done something crazy bad myself sometimes, in the hunt for the perfect stockimage...
Anyone here recognize his/hers images?
71
« on: July 14, 2010, 09:37 »
almost unlimited?
nice! then I can shoot a single picture of the world and from them zoom in and crop and upsize and create all the future pictures in my port
Ha ha, Slightly exaggerated maybe... Quote " The guy" " But taken in RAW then developed in tiff or tga it would be zoomable up to 500 time before noticeable degredation and I cant for the world figgure out why you would zoom that much and to what use." 500 times Even if he means 500% its quite a lot...
72
« on: July 14, 2010, 04:31 »
Or a woman with water melons?
73
« on: July 14, 2010, 04:20 »
Im arguing with a guy at Mp about upsizing. He says Canon has a software that makes it possible to upsize a RAW photo almost unlimited without visible degradation. I want that software for nikon as well Do anyone know what he may be talking about?
74
« on: July 13, 2010, 15:21 »
Eireann@ Istock is slow in the beginning if you have a mixed small portfolio. Add a few hundred files, and wait and youll see Istock beat the crap out of Dt. No doubt about it.
75
« on: July 12, 2010, 15:45 »
Congrats Magnum! I wish you many more sales like this!
Thanks I hope so too. Id never hesitate to sell a slightly changed existing 3d render for 2 grand, if it happens again.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
