MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lizard

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 ... 37
601
Crestock.com / Re: I think Crestock is refusing to pay me
« on: April 22, 2009, 18:11 »
Maybe its time for a quick update about this matter.

My Crestock agony is now lasting over 5 months , they claimed few weeks ago that their moneybookers  problem is resolved and they will pay
first people who requested their payment first.

It seems they "forgot" and skipped  me again like in december when they were paying just "small fees", now
they made few payments , but still not a trace of those 600$ that they own me now , and apparently they have no valid reason not to do it.

Lars is ignoring my forum posts (as you can see at their forum) , he is also not responding my e-mails to him ,and he just pretends like I don't exist.

I'm not an expert , but it seems to me that with the practice they are using , they are walking on that other side of the law.






602
Canon / Re: Which 70-200 lens to choose?
« on: April 14, 2009, 05:00 »
.

 

603
I like that look since I first saw it , anyway turbo easy to get that look in PS so if someone is interested:

Open a image in PS and make layer duplicate , and apply strong lens blur to upper layer and make a layer mask and invert it to black.
Take white to transparent gradient and apply it on the top and bottom of the mask so that the blur is visible only in those regions but once again it has to be very strong blur.

Then you need to merge the layers and over saturate new layer  (I do it in lab mode)  and you will get that "mini world" tilt shift effect effect.




604
Crestock.com / Re: I think Crestock is refusing to pay me
« on: March 27, 2009, 14:54 »


No really... They are behaving as lords of all people who give them their images on sale... I doubt that such Lordship is well accepted in majority of Crestock contributors... As I am aware and well informed - many people are just waitng to make payout money and then to run as far from Crestock as they can go... Whch will be very clever thing to do ;-)

Sorry, can you give me some examples of the "lordly" behavior?  I have 4400 pics there and haven't had any problems with them.  

Not saying it isn't happening, but so far the only example given is one unfortunate person who hasn't been paid.  Any more situations like this?

Yes there are , two people that dont use or dont want to use their forum contacted me on another site PP , apparently they are also waiting for months and their e-mails haven't been answered.

Someone that wrote at their forum is  beating my waiting record for good ,  and waits from 01.09.08 ( so that would be almost 7 months if I'm right) , and  few more people claim they are waiting for months so I'm apparently not a separate case. 


There are even people who claim they requested paypal payment and have been waiting for months , but I don't know if they have been paid. 

605
Crestock.com / Re: I think Crestock is refusing to pay me
« on: March 27, 2009, 03:16 »
I bet they have lawyers and will take cases. Yes, it is last resort, but better than doing nothing.

How will you find a lawyer in Hungary? Pay 1000$ to recup 10$ in earnings? The problem seems to be Moneybookers since Paypal works fine and Leaf reported regular payouts. Let's not be taken away by urban legends.

The same way you would find him in any other country , and you would still have the same problem.
I don't know whats the thing between you and  Hungary , but Crestock seems to be from Norway , but that doesn't change a thing.


Anyway , their explanation about the problem with moneybookers is somewhere near strange , like they are unable to set a bank account and moneybookeres account in same persons name , I wonder how did
they menage to work that way all this time.

Then their board members are busy people so they have no time to open the account in their names and sign few papers , then when they finally find the time, then the bank managed to open their account with wrong name.
How can a bank open a account in wrong name ?  Then they make a transfer from that wrong name bank account and the money is lost in space.

It is perfectly logic to me  that moneybookers refuse  transfers when the bank account is at one name and moneybookers account to another , and I think 5 months is more than enough to set those 2 accounts
cause we all had to do the same thing , and from all the people I know , no one had any major problems.

A person  wrote on their forum that she is waiting for payout from  01.09.08 , I first contacted them in mid November , and there are more people like us there.

And if its only moneybookers problem , why did they offered me direct bank transfer , and when I accepted they don't reply to my mails , and are being quiet on their forums about that ?
  


  

606
Im in the same boat , especially because I moved to FF so that 200mm is not enough anymore.

I like the option to frame without walking too much so I think I would go for 100-400 ,  it also cover almost the whole range of my 70-200 so I wouldnt need that one exept in low light conditions.

The question is how good is it , cause if it comes anywhere near 70-200 that would be great cause that's far best and sharpest lens I used , but my problem is that over here they don't allow you to try the lens before you buy it , and I took the risk with 24-105 and I don't intend to do that once more cause my copy of 24-105 sucks big time.

I didn't read the reviews and I didn't try those lenses so I cant talk about quality, but I think I will get 100-400 when the time comes.

 

607
Just an addition to my previous post. Try and sit somewhere here, and buy a drink. I will sit next to you, on another table and I will order the same drink. When time comes for us to pay the bill, we will see how much I paid, and how much you paid. Most likely you will pay at least 5 times more, because they all work with false bills, at least 25% of bills are false in every shop, pharmacy, restaurant, etc etc...

Always ask for price BEFORE you buy drinks in eastern Europe:)   

I have way better experience with eastern than western Europe , where in quite a few countries you order a drink and after 5 minutes they ask you to leave cause you
are blocking the table , and the the bill is few times higher than the price of the drinks you had.  Then you realize they are actually charging you the table that was never mentioned
and there is not a single info about that.

608
Crestock.com / Re: I think Crestock is refusing to pay me
« on: March 07, 2009, 10:07 »
well in defense of crestock, I have gotten numerous payouts, the last one being requested and paid in January, and altough they are not the fastest ones to pay out, they are not the slowest either.  That was with paypal however.  But my point is, that it is obviously not about having the funds available to pay photographers, it is about getting moneybookers to work, or finding another way.

Here is the crestock thread if you want to follow along there
http://www.crestock.com/forum/general-help/Getting-payed--4921.aspx?page=1


I would agree with you but..

They offered me direct bank transfer , so they obviously can use that method , but when I wrote to give them my bank account info  I never heard them back about that.

You can clearly see I ask them that in my post in that topic on 3. Feb , what should I do when they are not replaying to mails , write my bank account  info on public forum ?   

609
Crestock.com / Re: I think Crestock is refusing to pay me
« on: March 06, 2009, 17:19 »
Thing is I know that they had problems uploading founds to their mooneybookers account but...

Payments were sent to people requested them way after I did

The offered direct bank transfer (In a e-mail around Christmas) when I was away from home so I missed it for few days , so I know they can pay me that way if they want.
When I wrote them back  if they still need my bank info for that transfer , they change their minds and  told me they will still pay me via moneybookers in a week or two.


After quite few "week or two"  promises they wrote whats is their the problem at Crestock forum , and that they don't want to make any other promises.

After few weeks of silence they wrote they will send payments at the end of last week , or this Monday or Tuesday.

Again nothing, no explanations , and they do read their forum , but they just ignore my post as you can all see for yourself .


Its not about they are late with payment , If they  told me that they will pay me maybe next week or in a year, ok I would understand they got problems and they were polite
and told me the truth , but its  more about how they lie and fool me around with same trick for months and again I have to try my luck contacting  them to
get a "week or two" answer again until next closing of the circle.



And before this , I had few payments too , and without any problems , till this time.


610
Crestock.com / I think Crestock is refusing to pay me
« on: March 06, 2009, 09:16 »
I don know maybe am just over frustrated but I think they do anything in their power not to pay me out , I'm interested about what you think about the situation



I know the have some moneybookers problems so I waited to reach 300$ and requested my money, I was thinking that It will be easier to them this way.
Somewhere in mid November I requested payout , no one responded to my e-mail for a while.

On 24. Nov I started a topic on their forum cause my e-mails were useless , and they told me I will be paid soon in a week or two.

They were making payouts , but as I was explained in a e-mail to people who had small payments (I was at 350$ at that time) , and asked me if its OK with me to receive a direct bank payment.
I didn't saw that e-mail at first (my fault) , but then again they told me to forget about that , after I asked them If they still need my bank account info for payment.  They told me they should be able to pay me via moneybookers in a week or two.

Again nothing , so I wrote them another mail , and they didn't reply.

Then they wrote again  In the forum that I will be paid in a week or two.

That circle has been closed few times but I wasn't paid , no one wanted my bank info to pay me out.

Again I found a forum post that we will be paid at the end or last week or this Monday or Tuesday   , a you can guess what happened.


I wrote a forum post , but It seems they don't care cause nobody explained what happened this time, and people have mailed me about that so I know Im not the only one with this problem.
Even people with paypal were waiting for few months , as you can see in their forum.

So they don't reply to mails , they have stopped writing about it in their forum , and I'm waiting for my payment since mid November ( so almost 4 months) , I have more than 500$ that I need in their account and they are apparently paying small amounts to be able to pay to more people.

As they wrote me I know they can pay me with direct bank transfer , but when I offered them my bank info info  they stopped communicating with me.

I tried with a PM to Josh here , with no no luck , I don't know if he got it but I didn't receive a answer.

So they are holding 500$ that I fairly earned , and the best they can offer Is a week or two payment promise and they always brake it.

I was trying to hold my horses and not to start a topic about that outside their forums for a while  , but since they apparently don't care about that I was pushed over the edge.

I think its the basic thing about this business , to pay the contributors but some of us are not lucky enough.

Here is the original forum topic I started there so you can see I'm telling the truth : http://www.crestock.com/forum/general-help/Getting-payed--4921.aspx


Any suggestions ?



 







 











611
Shutterstock.com / Re: Possible resubmission?
« on: March 02, 2009, 21:12 »
Nice surprise today.

I always send batches of not less than 50-60 images and  I never had more than 3-4 rejections , in most cases 1 or 2 in more than 3 years.

Well, someone probably had a bad day, and rejected almost entire batch today.



And for what reasons , most illustrations were rejected for wrong white balance , then few " please upload color version of images" , by the way its the first time I got that reason for rejection.


I'm uploading the entire batch again for sure.


612
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia Payouts Held Up Again?
« on: March 02, 2009, 15:18 »
Edit




613
Interesting way of posting , first it was  red , than you added green then blue so it has to be something about RGB.  ;D








614
Crestock.com / Re: What takes so long to pay out?????
« on: February 26, 2009, 23:46 »
Well I'm waiting just 3 and half month now

615
I don't think its allowed on most sites, and I don't think that would be fair to the buyers.

616
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Best Match..
« on: February 23, 2009, 22:02 »
Well I prefer this than that other one in which whatever you searched, you'd get only photos showing  crowns  ;)

617
Crestock.com / Re: Crestock payment ?
« on: February 20, 2009, 16:52 »
Well I dont know whats up with them , I know they have some MB problems, but I'm waiting their payment  for more than 3 months now.

Here is the topic I started at their forum at Nov 24, 2008 , week or two after no one was responding to my e-mail about the matter.


http://www.crestock.com/forum/general-help/Getting-payed--4921.aspx



And Im still waiting.



618
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia changes to Exclusivity and other News
« on: February 18, 2009, 14:30 »
Glad to hear the $20 EL was a typo



Was it ?
I mean , even if it wont take effect ?
Was it ?

You know I have a neighbor who wanted a hat.
She asked her husband to buy her a nice little sport car ?
Poor guy was so happy when he was paying for that hat.

And If you ask me she wasn't into sports cars anyway.

619
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia changes to Exclusivity and other News
« on: February 18, 2009, 13:16 »
Is there a way to disable all EL sales in a click or by e-mail , or they just give me a free day for softly clicking with some nice music in the background ?  

620
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The Present B.M......
« on: February 09, 2009, 14:16 »
I feel as an exclusive contributor on istockphoto my images should be placed alot higher in the best match than an independant contributor.
Free Moo cards ,quicker review times,higher % on sales and the ability to upload more files per 72 hours are ok perks but i want best match to showcase my work ALL THE TIME.

As a non exclusive contributor I think they shouldn't , you have been given quantity , you should compete other contributors with quality not by being prefered by best match.





 

621
General Macrostock / Re: Macro and midstock agencies
« on: February 07, 2009, 20:41 »
Isnt that the idea of a private message though so you havnt got to share with everyone

So why share the fact that you've sent him a 'private message' on a public forum then? This is supposed to be a forum not a dating service.

I believe that you have seen until now on various forums (which you perhaps visited) this action, of letting one know that he / she got a private message. If you go to your account options you have the choice of disabling email notifications. Some people do this - disable notifications, except for some certain topics they create or want to follow up. More clear for you now?
Thank you for your invaluable contribution to this thread.

On topic now... if anyone has anything more about midstock / macrostock agencies.

Hm , now Im confused , more than what ? More then nothing that was publicly written , or more then anton9 wrote in his PM ?

You cant add something that wasn't mentioned , if you don't know what was mentioned , and it would be waste of time and forum space mentioning same thing twice , cause It was probably mentioned , or it wasn't ?







622
I realize this is a little speculative (but not greatly so, given the current state of play), but I believe this is the reason why, in the not too distant future, 'models' will be computer generated and not real people at all. The advances in CG characters in cinema in the past five years have been pretty spectacular.


Maybe then artists will have legal problems with real people who will clam that model is generated on the bases of their look , cause the model will have to look somehow , and there will probably be a real human that is similar to the model.

623
Off Topic / Re: Camera for my kid
« on: February 03, 2009, 07:31 »
My 4 year-old wants my camera and he sure can't have it.  So I decided to get him his own, kid-friendly camera but so far I haven't seen anything I like.
It should have more than the 2 megapix that seem to be standard for kids.  It also doesn't have to have any Disney characters printed on it and certainly Hannah Montana is not required.  Since he bangs it into everything all the time I would prefer a camera that has a smallish zoom lense, that is one that doesn't extend too far out and it should be light.  Oh, and I don't want to spend a lot of money as he will bang it into everything ...

Does anybody have any suggestions?

Thanks,
Tina

I know I saw some review somewhere about  a small PS camera all rubberized , waterproof, some guys were steeping and jumping on it , and throwing it from 3 floor or something during review and it survived  ;D

Its intended use was to serve the needs of people at construction sites , but maybe you could find it useful for this purpose.

I forgot who makes them , and I think it was ugly as I remember , I dont know how much it cost but , maybe someone around here knows.

624
New laptop from Apple:
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple_introduces_revolutionary?utm_source=embedded_video

:D


Stupidity has no limits


Yes, this is true.

Hello? This was a parody.


Well, i just watched few seconds , without thinking but..

After they introduced laptops without optical drive nothing from them can surprise me , cause that almost equals this.

625
Sure, but that's only cause the MAC / graphics / etc sales reps sell MAC's as better / faster / prettier than PC's. It will be hard for a MAC to beat my PC's performance, considering I have a Core 2 Quad 9300 CPU, 4GB DDRII 800Mhz RAM and 2x Gefore 9600 GT 3D cards :)

May be a Mac Pro with two Quad Core Xeon Harpertown CPU, 32 GB DDRII 800MHz and 2x NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 1.5Go?



U can easily use all that with 64x windows , add 2x superior NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 pack it in lets say coolermaster cosmost that is more quality build and looks better then the macs case.

Then put a decent cooling , and you will have a superior PC for way less $ spent.


Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 ... 37

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors