MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - qwerty

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 42
126
General Photography Discussion / Time Lapse Question -
« on: September 05, 2014, 18:19 »
I was thinking of taking a lot time lapse sequences (for fun and learning not necessarily stock at the moment) and want to know what people think about camera wear. Is it something to be concerned about or not.

I have a 5d MkII as my main camera and a 300D (Rebel) sitting in the draw gathering dust.  The 5dMk 2 seems to be overkill if I'm going to resize down to HD video resolution. Seemed like it might be a good use of the 300D to eventually send it to its grave.

From the web it quotes 40,000 shutter life for the 300D and 150,000 for the 5dMkII. How much is it to repair a "worn out" shutter ?

   

127
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime - Horrible Sales
« on: August 30, 2014, 05:19 »
don't know whats going on there but its not good for me.
Dreamstime sales have been decreasing for me since 2012 but it just fell off a cliff big time.

All sales subscription and not a lot of them.

Earnings 1/10 of that of shutterstock which is consistent with the poll results.


128
Shutterstock.com / Re: UK National Trust
« on: August 30, 2014, 05:08 »
I'm going to claim ownership, trademark and copywrite the sun. Any photos taken in natural light (other than lava) will be mine because the photons/waves originate from my sun.

Let me guess someone already beat me to it ?

129
Shutterstock.com / Re: UK National Trust
« on: August 29, 2014, 02:29 »
looks like its isolated carrots only from now on.

130
Maybe my search is different to yours due to my location. (if that still works)

In the first 100 in the search there a couple of contributors with "blocks of low DL images" 

1 set is an indies illustrations which are marginally keyworded. 5 images /100
1 set is from an exclusive photos uploaded in August this year 12 /100
1 set is from an exclusive photos uploaded in June this year  21/100
1 set is from an indy photos uploaded in July this year 11/100

I'd say there is a definite slant towards new content and there's probably more independent files than there use to be when the best match was heavily slanted to Exclusives.

But on my search its not just indy files in blocks with 0 uploads on the first page.

This search returns 2029 files which is pretty low number compared to alot of other searches. It looks to me that the newest files aren't being flushed out of the first page because of the relatively low number of new images.

131
RPI is a measure but not the whole story.

You could have a very high RPI but the costs to produce it are huge
Low RPI but lots of images plus low production costs may end up with more money.

If I deleted all my low - non sellers my RPI would be higher but I wouldn't have any more money in my pocket.

At the end of the day its profit vs time that counts. this is a combination of

RPI, Number of images, expenses, time spent producing, image saleable lifetime

 

132
Not sure how you - or they - would define better, but in a lot of searches, large blocks of 0 dls indie uploads, often very similar, are trumping exclusive files with sales. But unlike the OP, I don't find all searches have the same pattern in best match.

Are they brand new files or old one with 0 dls.

There should never be large blocks of the images from the same contributor especially if they're 0 sales and not brand new.

133
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS august sales
« on: August 15, 2014, 17:31 »
I'd agree start to August is terrible, worst in 8 years I've been on Istock including the first year when I had 100 images.

Northern Hemisphere Summer + More Images + Less Customers = Less Sales.

Bad Management + Poor Website Performance = Less Sales

134
General Stock Discussion / Re: Most crazy or funny portfolio!
« on: August 15, 2014, 17:19 »
If people weren't making money by doing this surely they'd lose interest at 1000 photos. Maybe not.

135
DPC

136
isn't this what they do on shutterstock forum ?
This forum is for constant moaning and talking about the death of microstock.

137
The recuring income and a motivation to keep taking photos.

138
General Stock Discussion / Re: infringement compensation
« on: May 27, 2014, 00:07 »
How are you going to enforce compensation ? Sue them ? Do they live in your country ?

Practically if its someone using it for a blog, in reality best you'll do is getting it taken down or they may choose to purchase.

If it was a multinational company using the image for a world wide advertising campaign it might be worth your time and money.

139
any comments regarding video cards ?

I don't want to run 3d games but video from my 5dMkII stalls my present 5 year old computer.

Any comments on Dell Inspiron Vs XPS series desktops.

140
with subscription model at shutterstock you get additional volume as people want to get value and fill their plate from the all you can eat buffet (well 25 a day) So you get additional sales because people are committed to creating "value" from the $249 they just spent. + most serious microstockers at on 50% higher due to progressing levels

The dollar club is basically an on demand full size for $1. + fotolia also pick up the membership fee ontop. Volume may go up a little but I can't see it offsetting the massive discount offered.  Full size sells for 6-20 times this on most other microstock sites.

Bad both ways.

Subcription buyer can probably buy all the photos they need at lower cost. = Less sales for contributors
Credit buyer can buy photos at 1/6th the cost. = substantially less revenue.

Benefits for Fotolia
Gain market share back to keep afloat
Increase margins by effectively reducing commissions to contributors
Keep to pocket 100% of the "membership fee"

Benefits to contributors
yet to see any



141
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales for Feb 2014 have started
« on: March 14, 2014, 19:24 »
every one of mine so far is 28 cents.

142
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Just a small nit
« on: March 14, 2014, 16:05 »
Ah, not a post about lobo then...

not a small nit but a big twit

143
3 millions photographers ??  In beta ? I'm confused

144
Yes but you must eat it...

Neither am I.  :)

I recently bought a house so I could take pictures of it so I am writing the cost off as a business expense.  When I am done taking pictures can I live in it?  Now if only the sites would accept pics of cars too.

(no, I am not serious)

Ginger Bread House ?

145
Dreamstime.com / Re: Lack of Sales on DT for March
« on: March 07, 2014, 16:05 »
DT seem to have a rotation system for the best match. I get a sequence of not many downloads, most subs, then I get a few credit sales.

Feb was terrible, lowest earnings since the first month I started there in 2007. It was basically 90% subs in Feb for me. 

Looking at the earning poll at the right is seems that the numbers are way down everywhere

146
http://tickerreport.com/banking-finance/153900/shutterstock-coo-unloads-493800-in-stock-sstk/


The COO sold about 1.5% of his total shareholding and pocketed almost half a million in cash. Nice for him but hardly a sign of lack of confidence in the future. Or maybe he's only 98.5% confident.


It looks like they are auto trade sales @ 5,000 shares which are executed on roughly the same date once per month.  To date they total $3,195,950.00

Chou James (Chief Technology Officer) cashed out on all his positions.

5,000    $98.7    $493,500    0 (Direct Ownership Share)

http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1549346.htm


Don't worry they'll assign themselves more bonuses and have more shares to sell.

147
If Istock listed I don't think I'd be buying any

148
Sorry if it has been answered in the last 27 pages.

Have the stats on Istock for September and Ooctober been updated or are they still the "incorrect" stats.


149
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock New Sub. Model Just Announced!
« on: March 05, 2014, 05:16 »
Subscriptions are a benefit to the seller if the website is easy to use,search works well and downloading is quick and easy. Customers end up downloading extra images just because they have to fill their plate at the buffet to feel like they got their money's worth.

Shutterstock is unique (and successful) as they managed to build alot of credit / on demand sales etc. My RPD at Shutterstock last month was over $1 .

Dreamstime with their level structure for credit sales should be making me the highest RPD but last months was $0.41 basically it was 90% subcriptions sales there last month. Disappointed with the trend there, I believe that their subscription pricing has migrated the buyers there mostly onto subscriptions. Unfortunately the pricing war on subscriptions has cut into credit sales. 

I believe that IStocks pricing for their subscription offer will just transform any serious buyer into a subscription customer. (The few that are left). I have no confidence in that their actions will increase the amount of money I make. Either at Istock or in the industry as a whole. (another subscription offer to compete with)

With migration to subs and no RC's then I doubt if many contributors will be able to make much above 16-17% tiers. or equivalent for exclusives.

If the returns for contributors continue to fall they risk falling (some would say continue to fall) into the death spiral where a lot of contributors couldn't be bothered uploading there as the returns won't be worth it.

With lowest % returns, some of the lowest pricing for non-exclusives and below average subscription rates it would appear it would be in my interest as a non-exclusive for the customers to go elsewhere and istock fall to 10th on the earning list.



 

150
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock New Sub. Model Just Announced!
« on: March 04, 2014, 02:39 »
yay Istock way to go. Looks like I'll be down to 15% when all their buyers move to subscriptions.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 42

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors