76
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Footage
« on: February 08, 2016, 11:57 »Are you uploading clips on istock?
Absolutely not! Terrible royalty model for contributors.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 76
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Footage« on: February 08, 2016, 11:57 »Are you uploading clips on istock? Absolutely not! Terrible royalty model for contributors. 77
Adobe Stock / Re: 4K live on Adobe Stock« on: February 05, 2016, 11:27 »
If video is being sold on a subscription I'll have to stop uploading. That's why I stopped uploading video to fotolia years ago.
Another concern is an extended license is being included at the $199 price! Shutterstock sold a clip for me last month where my take was $180! You don't have to give all the additional rights away. Extended rights should be an added cost on top of the $199 price. Giving extended rights along with the price of a 4k clip is essentially a price cut! Please don't do it. 78
Mobile Stock Photogrpahy - General Discussion / Re: Upload a picture to multiple agencies in less than 2 minutes. For free!« on: January 23, 2016, 16:40 »... you can upload pictures from your smartphone, your Google drive account or Dropbox to your favorite agencies via ftp. Thanks for the dropbox explanation unfortunately I'm on an iphone so that's why I wasn't seeing a way to do this. If you can create something that allows me to upload a video once and submit to several agencies via ftp I'm totally onboard 79
General - Stock Video / Re: Ultra low commisions on Getty this month - Wochit« on: January 22, 2016, 14:11 »
I got hit with this too. Dozens of video sales for pennies each. Not very happy about it!
I don't see anything about it on the getty artists forum but I did notice that the forum is a ghost town. 80
Mobile Stock Photogrpahy - General Discussion / Re: Upload a picture to multiple agencies in less than 2 minutes. For free!« on: January 22, 2016, 14:02 »... you can upload pictures from your smartphone, your Google drive account or Dropbox to your favorite agencies via ftp. How can I upload pictures from my Dropbox to agencies via ftp using this app? I can't see a way to do this. Also, will it work for video? 81
General Stock Discussion / Re: EyeEm Collection now non-exclusive and soon to be distributed through Alamy« on: January 12, 2016, 12:50 »Just uploaded a few. Their uploader doesn't read caption or keywords making this a very labor intensive process. Jeeez! That's a great suggestion! In fact, from a stock perspective, entering minimal keywords would make your work harder to find on the community side of things which could help minimize theft. Especially considering their non-existent watermarks. 82
General Stock Discussion / Re: EyeEm Collection now non-exclusive and soon to be distributed through Alamy« on: January 11, 2016, 15:05 »
Just uploaded a few. Their uploader doesn't read caption or keywords making this a very labor intensive process. Jeeez!
83
General Stock Discussion / Re: EyeEm Collection now non-exclusive and soon to be distributed through Alamy« on: January 11, 2016, 11:43 »
I just wrote to them and their reply states that images accepted to the getty collection are now non-exclusive. The wording on the site however still shows that the images are exclusive.
84
General Stock Discussion / Re: EyeEm Collection now non-exclusive and soon to be distributed through Alamy« on: January 07, 2016, 15:55 »
Hmm, didn't get that email and if I'm on my Eyeem page to approve the images they selected for getty, it still says the images sent to getty must be exclusive.
85
General - Stock Video / Re: Upload 4K and HD seperately? Your thaughts...« on: December 12, 2015, 18:29 »So, there are contributors already uploading both versions AND getting them approved? I'm referring to the rankings of the individual clips. Each agency has there own secret algorithm that determine what order they show the clips when a search is performed. While we may not know all the specifics of the algorithm it's generally agreed upon that the more times a clip is downloaded for a given keyword the higher up that clip appears in the results when someone searches for that keyword. Theoretically, if you have separate HD and 4k versions of a clip and they each get downloaded 5 times, each clip will have 5 downloads instead of the 10 downloads the single clip would have had. Over time a clip with 10 downloads is going to appear higher in the search results than a clip with 5 downloads for a given search term. If the search term has very few results then it really doesn't matter but if it is a competitive term it may make the difference between your clip ever being seen or not. 86
General - Stock Video / Re: Upload 4K and HD seperately? Your thaughts...« on: December 12, 2015, 13:42 »So, there are contributors already uploading both versions AND getting them approved? Yes, if you're uploading duplicate versions you're going to negatively effect the rankings for both resolutions. I don't think that uploading multiple clips is the solution. Although, if the collection becomes more of a mess because people are doing this it might encourage SS to fix the problem. 87
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock will now accept new contributors with 1/10 passing review.« on: December 05, 2015, 18:11 »
Maybe that's the way it should be? In my opinion, microstock should never have been anything other than low to medium quality images. Using thousands of dollars worth of camera equipment to make pennies per sale has always been unsustainable for photographers. It's reality time. 88
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock now selling video« on: December 01, 2015, 21:41 »
Mat, can you tell us yet what the 4k pricing will be?
89
General Stock Discussion / Re: Kelly Thompson to 500PX« on: November 24, 2015, 17:42 »
Go to your "manage photos" page, click on the symbol on the upper right hand corner of a thumbnail image and it will take you to the licensing page. If the page has a red banner on it like the one in this image it means it hasn't been reviewed yet.
90
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty's new $100m debt« on: November 23, 2015, 13:15 »To be fair the $6 is a promotion of some kind not all 4k or HD is that low. That being said 18 out of my 28 Dl's in Oct. were below $20.00. I have a few at really good prices but those 1 and 6 dollar sales kill me. 91
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty's new $100m debt« on: November 23, 2015, 13:07 »To be fair the $6 is a promotion of some kind not all 4k or HD is that low. That being said 18 out of my 28 Dl's in Oct. were below $20.00. I have a few at really good prices but those 1 and 6 dollar sales kill me. It's called Premium Access. It's where large companies pay getty $$$ upfront every year to be able to license a large quantity of images or footage at highly reduced rates. G keeps all the money upfront and pays the contributor their contractual royalty percentage on very small dollar amount sales. They've been doing this for years and it blows. It's just a way to payout less to contributors. 92
General - Stock Video / Re: So, how much money Revostock owe you? Let's sum up the total.« on: November 23, 2015, 13:02 »
Revo owes me about $900.
93
General Stock Discussion / Re: Kelly Thompson to 500PX« on: November 20, 2015, 01:15 »
Yeah, saw this today and it sounded like terrible news. I was just getting excited about 500px and then they hired this guy to run the marketplace...
95
General Stock Discussion / Re: Eyeem market« on: November 18, 2015, 17:35 »No more exclusivity ?!? I just wrote to EyeEm support about the exclusivity question and this was there reply: "Thanks for getting in touch with us. We're happy to help you out here. Currently, per our distribution agreements images are exclusive to Getty Images, however images that you put up on EyeEm Market only are non-exclusive and can be used elsewhere. " This is reply is in line with what is said on their site regarding exclusivity. If the image is accepted by getty then it is considered exclusive. UPDATE: I just got another email telling me basically that the deal isn't done and as of right now all images distributed through eyeem by getty are considered exclusive. 96
General Stock Discussion / Re: Eyeem market« on: November 18, 2015, 12:10 »
What I'm seeing at eyeem is a bunch of really big, unwatermarked images selling for just $20. What's the motivation to actually buy them?
I know from my direct contributions to getty that the majority of the sales will be from their premium access customers and will result in mostly pennies to the contributor. For those contributing to eyeem, am I missing something? 97
VideoBlocks / Re: VideoBlocks footage marketplace - keep 100% of what you earn« on: November 16, 2015, 13:04 »
Same here. A couple dozen sales last month and only 2 so far this month. Glad to know it's not just me.
I noticed last month that they started reporting my sales a day after they happened and a whole bunch of sales came in the last couple days of the month. Maybe they're trying to get a handle on returns by not reporting sales until they've cleared. 98
General Stock Discussion / Re: 500 px. Now has distributors to sell images« on: November 11, 2015, 14:50 »Nuno, maybe you can answer this question: Nuno, could you please answer the question above? I hope that likes and favorites don't play a part in the marketplace search results because I've found it to be a very fickle thing. I can upload an image and get no "likes" or "favorites" then delete the image and upload it again a couple hours later and get a bunch of "likes" within a few minutes. With likes/favorites timing is everything and I'd hate to think some of my best images fall through the cracks in the marketplace because I'd uploaded them at the wrong time. Thanks! 99
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Getty's new $100m debt« on: November 10, 2015, 13:45 »
At this point I think the only thing they can do with that money that might make any difference would be to drastically increase contributor royalty rates and get photographers back in the game. Photographers word of mouth campaigns and happy contributors that are also buyers were their greatest asset at one time. Of course they didn't realize it then and there's no reason to believe they "get it" now either.
100
General Stock Discussion / Re: What are the Best Macro Rights Managed Sites to Try?« on: November 07, 2015, 20:39 »I also have a Photoshelter website which in my opinion isn't very user friendly and I just got a $250 RM license sale. It's the strategy behind the direct selling model that matters most. Was that sale a direct result of your own promotion or a sale that came through their "Lattice" site (http://www.photoshelter.com/lattice/search/)? |
|