MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Aurielaki

Pages: [1]
1
Apologies are always appreciated , but this is only the first step.

but the error was made by iStock , this is the risk of doing business.
Istock has made ??mistakes and I do not see why I have to pay for his mistakes .
Istock will assume the burden of this failure . So this will be a GREAT incentive for it to NOT COMMIT more mistakes like that.
My job : to make images that may have market , load them (in their mode cumbersome and slow), I have this job done properly.
THEIR job : to sell my images , to correctly calculate royalties and distribute them in a timely manner . This work Istock has done wrong.
WHY I have to pay for a job that someone else has done wrong ?
They are mistaken his own work and I have to pay for this mistake.
If I 'm wrong in my work, I pay directly the consequences.
But what I did wrong in my work ? NOTHING
This mechanism that istock has put together is deeply wrong
I repeat, do not ever again shortly nullla and retire all of my images.
I do not understand why I have to be treated so badly by a microstock .

Why do you think its normal to keep money that isnt yours? Honest question. In my opinion, it doesnt work like that with any company.

If the taxman makes a mistake, you have to pay it back
When items in a store are priced differently, you pay the register price, even when its more expensive
When utilities make a mistake you have to pay them back.

I once was undercharged for my gas bill due to their error, and still needed to pay the money, I protested but all they did was give me payback scheme to soften the blow.


ETA: Being overpaid by your employer or a mistake from the bank will also be corrected and the money has to be returned.
Hi Ron,
I do not understand the binomial:
you make a mistake -> I will pay for your mistake
This I really do not understand it.
Peace

2
Apologies are always appreciated , but this is only the first step.

but the error was made by iStock , this is the risk of doing business.
Istock has made ??mistakes and I do not see why I have to pay for his mistakes .
Istock will assume the burden of this failure . So this will be a GREAT incentive for it to NOT COMMIT more mistakes like that.
My job : to make images that may have market , load them (in their mode cumbersome and slow), I have this job done properly.
THEIR job : to sell my images , to correctly calculate royalties and distribute them in a timely manner . This work Istock has done wrong.
WHY I have to pay for a job that someone else has done wrong ?
They are mistaken his own work and I have to pay for this mistake.
If I 'm wrong in my work, I pay directly the consequences.
But what I did wrong in my work ? NOTHING
This mechanism that istock has put together is deeply wrong
I repeat, do not ever again shortly nullla and retire all of my images.
I do not understand why I have to be treated so badly by a microstock .

3
I opened a ticket, with them.
--------------------------
I demand a detailed account of day-to-day and image by image of the gains that you feel wrong.
I will not settle for an email with a monetary figure put it that way approximate.
Although earnings are irregular expect a detailed report.
---------------------------

At least give it bother you!
they MUST specifically Reporting back
It is not possible to behave so badly.
I'm very very angry!

4
I have a little portfolio of isometric vector.
my images have a high technical value.
With the system 123RF, I will be very much penalized although I have a high technical portfolio.
If 123RF wants to throw out small contributors can do. Is the law of market.
But for the law of market I  will move the my portfolio where it is appreciated.
Gets angry be treated as a nuisance instead of a resouce and end up inside a uman meat grinder.
This is the global market and the only choice is to migrate my images on other shelves.

5
I will sit out the year, then remove my portfolio. Screw you and your greedy crap.

That makes two of us bud!!! ;)
another here.  If 123 loses customers (in the way IS/FT did) I wonder if finally sites will think it worth treating contributors fairly...probably not

another here! I am deeply angered by the decision to 123RF.

I have a small portfolio (170 img), but with a high quality.
Under an earnings threshold, it leads in the robbery.
Who wants to be robbed remains well. But it was a massacre.

If these are the intentions of 123RF,
before the end of the year will cancel my portfolio.

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors