pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MarcvsTvllivs

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15]
351
Yaymicro / Re: Review time slowdown at Yay?
« on: April 05, 2012, 18:18 »
MarcvsTvllivs

I got a bunch of sales from them at the end of last year...but nothing since.

Cricket

I know, I hear people talk about sales there and I wonder what I am doing wrong...

352
Yaymicro / Re: Review time slowdown at Yay?
« on: April 05, 2012, 16:45 »
Hi Everyone  ;D

Has anyone else noticed a review time slowdown at Yay?  I am just wondering if it has something to do with all the upgrades they are doing to their site.

I submitted a total of 10 files to them on March 29 and they are still awaiting approval.

BTW... they changed their image requirements.  Images now have to be a minimum of 6 MP.

Cricket

Yeah, they definitely slowed down. Which is weird, since all they seem to be doing for "review" is clicking an "accept" button. Not that it matters - I just can't seem to get a sale, no matter that my portfolio is larger there than elsewhere.

353
I agree. But I think the blame should be shared with 81-85% of blame going to the sites and 15-19% of the blame going to contributors...

;D

354
Yesterday I keyworded a bunch of images uploaded at the weekend (123 doesn't seem to like keywords delimited with ;) and all approved this morning - that's pretty quick

Delimiting keywords with ;) would be pretty cool though...  ;D

355
123RF / Re: 123RF Property Release Craziness
« on: April 04, 2012, 06:55 »
Please refer our "Property Release" article for better understanding of Why and When a Property Release is needed.


Yeah well, maybe your reviewers should read that blog post, too. I had every single picture of Mayan ruins at Tulum put into Editorial. They are on every other site without issue, and squarely fit the exception for well-known landmarks.

356
123RF / Re: 123RF Property Release Craziness
« on: April 03, 2012, 18:06 »

I love how they put a series of completely nondescript signs (i.e. road signs and the like) into editorial via their "submit to editorial if not accepted" option. what? Might as well refuse - for editorial I am sure nondescript road signs have quite LCV...  ::)

not sure why you wouldn't want your images to go in as editorial

123 does have one of the strictest rules on property releases, but they also have the far-and-away best editorial process i've seen - unlike other agencies, the submitter doesnt have to waste time trying to decide to submit as rf or editorial, and then resubmitting, and following anal punctuation rules for captions.  instead, you just let 123 decide how they want to deal with a particular image.  they also have the best editorial acceptance  i've found - es[pecially for travel images and others where it would be impossible to get mpodel releases, but other agencies reject as LCV or 'not newsworthy'

Are you serious? You don't understand why I wouldn't want an isolated, empty blue sign to be limited to editorial use? What would anybody do with that as editorial?!

As for the rest you are saying, I wholeheartedly agree. It's the best implementation of editorial I have seen.

357
123RF / Re: 123RF Property Release Craziness
« on: April 02, 2012, 04:38 »
I agree, it's ridiculous. And unlike Photodune, where weird property release rejections are just one of many aspects of their reviewers randomness, it really appears to be a specialty at 123RF...

I love how they put a series of completely nondescript signs (i.e. road signs and the like) into editorial via their "submit to editorial if not accepted" option. what? Might as well refuse - for editorial I am sure nondescript road signs have quite LCV...  ::)

358
General Midstock / Re: Zoonar now distributing through Getty
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:43 »
zoonar claims: Unfortunately, our costs for keywording, checking, translating, captioning and deleting photos has risen considerably.

   what keywording or casptioning are they doing????

i've had ZERO sales from these guys, so dont think it'll matter much what happens from here on out -

I am not sure but I think they actually have their own editorial people look at the pictures before they release them to partners. Some pictures go to "refused" for a certain partner almost immediately, while the rest then stays for weeks or months in "released". To me that indicates that someone at Zoonar decided not to send that particular file.

Also, since they allow mingling of languages in keywords and most others do not, I suppose they have to edit out (or translate) keywords by hand. Their own fault, really, but us paying for agency inefficiency isn't new or limited to Zoonar.

359
General Stock Discussion / Re: Photocase
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:36 »
Hi there! Do any of you contribute to Photocase? I just joined and can't get an image accepted, and haven't a clue as to why. Just wondering what your experience there has been and if you have any insight into their process. My images meet all their tech criteria, so don't know what it could be. Thanks for any thoughts you care to share.

Just got my first reviews back, so far everything accepted. Oh well, I always knew I'm not very good at stock  :-\

360
General Midstock / Re: Zoonar now distributing through Getty
« on: March 28, 2012, 15:43 »
What a heck!
Why only Corbis is forbidden, why not Alamy or SS etc...?

Maybe they just hate Corbis a little more than the rest of them?  :D

361
General Midstock / Re: Zoonar now distributing through Getty
« on: March 28, 2012, 09:52 »
Quote
It is required however, that your submitted photos are not already on sale at Veer or Corbis.
I'm afraid that Zoonar contributors are the ones that upload their images to 15+ different sites and 99% of them also upload their images to Veer.

Yeah. The funny thing is that this passage is not in the partner agreement stuff on their website. I also don't quite see how this would be managed...

362
General Midstock / Re: Zoonar now distributing through Getty
« on: March 27, 2012, 22:32 »
And you can already hear the familiar Getty tune being sung in the near background - La Di Da Reduced Royalties La Di Da.

YMMD  ;D

Here's a little more detail from Zoonar's site as to what Getty channels they will be using:

Getty Images is probably the best known global picture agency. You can submit RF photos of all price ranges to Getty Images. Your photos will be distributed via the Getty platforms Jupiterimages, Thinkstock and Photolibrary, perhaps via Photos.com too. Photolibrary was acquired by Getty Images in 2011, but still sells photos in the Asian market.

Getty Images generates very high sales numbers. Therefore, we strongly recommend you accept this partner. Some photos on Photolibrary and Jupiterimages are sold at very high prices. However, the majority of photos are sold via subscription at low prices and in large numbers.

363
General Midstock / Zoonar now distributing through Getty
« on: March 27, 2012, 17:26 »
Just received the following mail from Zoonar:

Dear photographers,

we have important news for you:

1. We are pleased to present Getty Images as our new distribution partner. As of now you can only submit photos which dont require a model or property release. We hope to offer you a new release management tool by the middle of 2012, which will make it possible for you to submit photos that require a release. Getty Images has generated high sales through its platforms Jupiterimages and Thinkstock which has made many photographers want to submit photos for this partner. We are expectant to see how many photos will be accepted by Getty Images. We have no figures based on experience yet, but we hope that most of your photos will be accepted. It is required however, that your submitted photos are not already on sale at Veer or Corbis.

2. We are also pleased about the number of submitted photos in our partner system. Because of high revenue generated by Getty, AGE, DPP Fotofinder and the other partners we get a lot more submissions now than a few months ago. Unfortunately, our costs for keywording, checking, translating, captioning and deleting photos has risen considerably.

For our partner system to be sustained and further expanded we need to decrease the commission rate from 60% to now 50%. We will change our terms and conditions accordingly, starting on 06/01/2012. From then on your commission rate for all sales through our partner network will be 50%. For your sales at Zoonar you will still get a commission rate of up to 80%.

Because we change our terms and conditions on 06/01/2012 you have a special right of termination within a period of four weeks beginning at reception of this newsletter. Should you wish to withdraw your photos from our partners please send us an email to [email protected] with your username and the names of the partners you wish to withdraw from until 04/30/2012.
We kindly ask you for your understanding once more and we assure you that the additional money we receive is invested in our partner network and the distribution of your photos.

Kind regards,
Your Zoonar Team


This should be a good thing, right?

364
Panthermedia.net / Re: Are the polls fixed?
« on: March 26, 2012, 15:19 »
For me and my (non-stocky) port they are far better than Veer, far better than Yay. Still a low earner though.

I am German (as is Panther Media) but that shouldn't have anything to do with it, as I keyword in English and my port isn't particularly German.

365
Im in on the first attemp! :D

Now i can call you my colleagues.

And competitors.

Too true. Congrats!

366
Veer / Veer Problems
« on: March 01, 2012, 14:02 »
My Veer account has been stuck in the registration/approval process for months now. I have about 50 approved images, but they do not show in search. In Workspace it says that my tax forms are being reviewed. The link to redo the tax forms eventually leads to an error message ("try again later").

I have repeatedly tried to reach someone at Veer. The Corbis employees that man the help chat are very nice and try to help, but they are salespeople and don't know how to do contributor support. I have mailed to all the addresses they gave me, but to no avail. The best result was at [email protected]: I received an out of office reply telling me that there would be nobody there on January 2 (I tried this today).

All this leads me to ask: Does anybody else have these problems? How can I reach them? And: Is Veer even worth all this trouble?

367
Good luck. iStock took me 5 attempts, mostly because I didn't really know what they are looking for. If it doesn't work, ask here. People are really helpful.

An Argentinian in Bogot... I hope the locals aren't giving you too hard a time  ;D. Especially since Colombian for "not being given too hard a time" is not being robbed too much...

368
Bienvenidos, dude.

Those photos look beautiful. I am sure some will do well as microstock, and I concur with the others that you should submit to both iStock and Shutterstock. You might also want to use an RM agency like Alamy for those pictures that are not typical stock...

Love your country and your city (and your women ;)), BTW.

369
Newbie Discussion / Re: why can't I start a new thread?
« on: February 27, 2012, 15:35 »
thanks!

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors