|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - noodle
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 37
51
« on: June 20, 2020, 13:57 »
Think we are making an impact?
This should only add fuel to our fire!
52
« on: June 17, 2020, 12:23 »
Who cares what it is ... all SS cares about is that people are dumb enough to support them
53
« on: June 13, 2020, 08:21 »
If DT wanted to do something useful, they would lower their minimum payout. With all the competition, $100 is too high.
WAAYYYY too high They should switch it to $25 with the volume of sales they produce
54
« on: June 13, 2020, 08:19 »
I will not boycot SS.
We are hitting a global economic crisis, worse than the Great Depression.
I accept, that the value of my images may drop to 10 cents.
Right now my earnings did not change. I am level 5.
Good for you Glad that 2 weeks into the changes, your earnings have not changed And thank you for starting this thread - very thought provoking. Maybe things will turn around for the rest of 98% of us who have experienced a huge drop off. Probably just an anomaly.
55
« on: June 09, 2020, 19:47 »
Heres an idea. Instead of playing games, just go to Shutterstock and delete your images.
BINGO!!
56
« on: June 07, 2020, 09:22 »
Hahaha, I will stay in ss because I need money. 
Whats funny
The lunatic is on the grass... "I can't think of anything to say except... Laughing is nice! HaHaHa!"
58
« on: May 30, 2020, 14:04 »
Fun fact about Shutterstock 2022:
After a very difficult year 2021, due to the departure of most of the contributors, the company is forced to close its doors...
Highly unlikely - although at this point I wouldnt mind it to come true They will still be profitable for a long, long time And will wring out every penny TIL the last one
59
« on: May 25, 2020, 20:11 »
I can easily shot 15 images a day. At 60 bucks per shot that would be 900 per day....Not a bay day rate...Sign me up...
That isn't the deal though, is it. They want to pick only the ones they want.
Can't compare apples & oranges.
Let em shoot 15 a day for $900 Easy peasy If life were so easy to figure out
60
« on: April 26, 2020, 07:11 »
Nice how Ss only removes those three
I guess they do tolerate theft
61
« on: April 08, 2020, 16:55 »
Theyre afraid of accepting images that might contain Covid 
62
« on: March 08, 2020, 20:23 »
Ive emailed them about this but no reply
Lousy customer service, they dont care about contributers
Why is it that these glitches ALWAYS affect only the contributers ?
63
« on: February 13, 2020, 15:05 »
Theres only so many ways to increase profits - and its usually on the backs of contributers
SS messed up starting with increasing the allowable print run for a sub price and every move since then has been detrimental to contributers earnings
Every move
64
« on: February 11, 2020, 16:19 »
Looks like owners of Alamy took the money and run and couldnt care less what happens to contributers
I suppose we will find out soon enough
65
« on: January 30, 2020, 10:36 »
Hopefully they go down and all other sites like this that have cut commissions dont have sales and treat contributers as rubbish
Good riddance
66
« on: January 11, 2020, 22:48 »
Youre resurrecting a 13 year old thread?
67
« on: December 10, 2019, 11:21 »
You mean you cant just sit back and watch the profits roll in?
68
« on: December 09, 2019, 14:37 »
I can understand you being a mouse and all, you would not like that image
69
« on: December 06, 2019, 21:46 »
That footage and editing is professional
Kind of reminds me of Warren Millers ski videos in some ways
70
« on: November 19, 2019, 19:28 »
This means with Getty out of the way the RM sales will fall into the laps of the agencies still willing to sell RM rights.
Even though RF has made a big time encroachment into the RM sales, there are still businesses that are willing to stay with RM licenses for some of their projects, and I think (hope) this bodes some good news for the likes of Alamy
71
« on: November 11, 2019, 15:47 »
I had inquiry before for images that are editorial because I dont have the copyright releases.
I said I would only sell the image if they explicitly in writing were willing to take on any legal consequences that would result from their use of the image fully.
They did not want to do that, and as a result I never sold the image in that capacity.
Just make sure you cover yourself and ask for it in writing
72
« on: November 07, 2019, 11:29 »
This should be under Shutterstock reviewers are idiots thread
73
« on: November 06, 2019, 05:48 »
Looks like their race to the bottom strategy isnt working out
74
« on: November 01, 2019, 12:59 »
Run for the hills from this agency!!
75
« on: October 31, 2019, 19:15 »
I dont understand this site
I had a few submissions that had really stupid rejections a couple years back and havent uploaded since - actually hoping they would resolve this issue and I would resume uploading, but still is an ongoing problem from what I read
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 37
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
