|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - danielsbfoto
26
« on: December 23, 2015, 10:37 »
Thank you cobalt and eco I thought to use it just for video. I see what you said no good performance with poor light. This is an unresolved issue for photo. Anyway a raw file let you edit noise reduction and so. I see good stabilization in your clips.
27
« on: December 23, 2015, 07:05 »
Hi Videographers, someone works or knows about DJI Osmo camera. Sensor Sony, 14 Mp. Raw file format, sounds good. Your experience or feedback please.
28
« on: December 16, 2015, 03:08 »
Unusual changes for me too. I saw a thread here about some account cracked at Dreamstime.... 
29
« on: November 22, 2015, 04:39 »
Maybe I'm wrong but I use to limit my uploads just five files by time (at SS IS or F).
I thought by this way to ensure some kind of presence at the search engine at least by "New" and at the same time to excite the visit to my port. Maybe it works too with the reviewers... I don't know...just a theory
30
« on: August 28, 2015, 13:25 »
SS,Is, and many more let us do it. Presumption of innocence. 
31
« on: August 28, 2015, 09:59 »
"Many more exciting changes and tools are being prepared for you so stay tuned!"
Hi MatHayward:
Why don't give us the chance to make adjust on the keywords at future, once the file has been accepted.
I think is a good tool to fix up mistakes or sometimes improve the file chances.
32
« on: August 02, 2015, 02:28 »
Maybe reloading the firmware..... 
33
« on: June 23, 2015, 02:42 »
Hi Matt, Is in your upgrade program the possibility to add keywords once the file has been submitted and approved? Thanks and go on with your improvements!
34
« on: June 05, 2015, 05:24 »
I heard somewhere that good ratio approach is one download for one photo at port.
So 300 photos to 300 downloads (SS). Quality of the port is important and content too. One port with photos about people or models I thought works better than other. For customers RF with models are very sweet.
35
« on: May 02, 2015, 02:52 »
I can understand why they would want to stop people adding extra words though. Really, sure there some kind of software needs but I think it works against commercial interest. I have some slaves photos with missing words (mistake was mine) Whats the way, deleted and uploaded again? please make the easy way like others.
36
« on: April 14, 2015, 12:44 »
So I started and I'm here again. I made my first ESP submission of a butch of videos. They were accepted and now (one week passed ) looking for a search (new) the thumbnails and the enlarged view at the file page no working, no view. I mailed reporting but no answer yet. Some experience?
37
« on: March 18, 2015, 11:15 »
few minutes. I never had before any Getty sales or those Getty 360....? Wait and see
38
« on: March 18, 2015, 11:08 »
Yes green bar
39
« on: March 18, 2015, 10:36 »
I've checked my status and pp sales has been duplicated that usually. That is the Getty virus or a bug. Do you?
40
« on: March 18, 2015, 02:37 »
"they slashed non-exclusive video prices" "heavy upload system" Two reasons to think it twice.
Thank you
41
« on: March 17, 2015, 10:25 »
Looking for advice
I'm thinking start to submit some clips to IS. I'm waiting for approval
"Final clip Submissions:
Start by uploading a low-resolution proxy file. Our inspection team will review the proxy and let you know if we want you to upload the full-resolution clip. "If the proxy file is approved you will receive an e-mail with instructions"
This conditions are update? worth it? Really seems from other time
42
« on: February 28, 2015, 03:34 »
"Fotolia beats Shutterstock" Not for me. SS 1 Fotolia 3 or some times 4 place. And let me say in comparison SS FT the deficient system of manage pictures after submission and the inconsistent criteria from FT revisors. Some of my best selling files at SS were rejected by FT. I think they never will be better than SS for contributors at least.
43
« on: February 10, 2015, 03:30 »
A lot of views but nothing else. Nine months, 45 files, no sales.
44
« on: February 01, 2015, 15:22 »
I uploaded film files escaned with an Imacon scan, I mean a conscientious scan, and I have a few refuses just the reviewer confuse the grain film with noise. Notes to curator.Cultural frontier.
45
« on: January 09, 2015, 12:06 »
I'm there from eight months with 42 videos. A lot of views but not sales. Some experience. Is worth it?
46
« on: January 01, 2015, 03:18 »
I use to get the footage with a 5DII but I have some interesting videos...street video or so and I wonder if they accepted by their rules, I couldn't find it in guidelines. P5 use to ask for the camera source. May I will try on next submit....
47
« on: December 31, 2014, 13:00 »
Please advice. Videographers, the footage taken with Iphone 5 or 6 are accepted by SS or P5. I'm not expert but seems that technical are similar I mean .mov and hd resolution and so. Thank you.
48
« on: December 15, 2014, 09:52 »
I always thought, and I use to do it, that is better submit small batches each just to excite in your favor the search engines more frequently. I don't know if that is a good way so the experience on SS worked better for me.
49
« on: November 18, 2014, 12:57 »
I agree
50
« on: August 19, 2014, 13:55 »
If you PM us your name we will be able to take a look at your collection and perhaps offer some advice if you would like us to.
I have my portfolio in Alamy a few years and I really would like to know some advices from my agent,not jus Alamy other too. Comentaris,tips,corrections,something more expressive over the classic artifacts prayer.
There are a useful way to ask for that?
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
