526
Bigstock.com / Re: BigStock and SS - what's the future going to bring?
« on: January 14, 2010, 11:32 »
^^ refers to above
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 526
Bigstock.com / Re: BigStock and SS - what's the future going to bring?« on: January 14, 2010, 11:32 »
^^ refers to above
527
Bigstock.com / Re: BigStock and SS - what's the future going to bring?« on: January 14, 2010, 11:03 »BigStock has always been a steady producer for me, not great not bad. Lately though it has dropped off the face of the earth. I hope it picks back up soon. ^^ +1 528
General Photography Discussion / Re: Archiving - Its still not clear« on: January 13, 2010, 11:37 »Why use the proprietary PSD format? TIF is open format, lossless too, and has about the same size. I have to admit I use zipped TIF (which is more compact). For photos, why should you save layers? The flat TIF is enough, unless you do illustrations. The reason you might want to save the edited copy in layers is in case you want to print the image . . . tweaking while softproofing for a printer's profiles. You don't really want to print without knowing and correcting for a specific printer's profile. Not to mention paper profiles. 529
General Photography Discussion / Archiving - Its still not clear« on: January 13, 2010, 08:36 »
Like many of you here, for each image I have a jpeg file for uploading, a layered PSD file and the original Raw file archived on multiple locations. What is not clear to me is what file format should I use for the layered file, either a layered Tiff (16) or the proprietary format of PSD? One mistake I have been making is not using "Backwards Compatibilty" on my PSD files, thus slowing down Bridge previews among other disadvantages.
From Cambridge In Colour: http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/archival-photo-backup.htm Unfortunately, many of the formats used for storing edited photos are also subject to future compatibility issues. Fortunately, this is one area where changing technology can mean you'd like to rework certain images using the latest software and techniques. Just make sure that you also have an archived version of the unaltered original photo. Overall, the only fail-proof solution is to keep your data up-to-date. Every few years it's a good idea to convert file types that are in danger of becoming obsolete. I know this has been discussed before but the above quote tells me that it might be unimportant whether a Tiff or PSD is the choice. Any thoughts from those of you who have thought this through? 530
Veer / Re: What happens to Veer MP?« on: January 12, 2010, 14:18 »
For me it was $11.55 with no withholding tax deducted. As an American living in Germany that is correct. Happy they got it right.
E 531
Featurepics.com / Re: Anyone selling at Featurepics?« on: January 09, 2010, 06:30 »I joined them last year because they had higher prices and higher commissions. ^^^ with 595 files. So . . . . . . . 595 + 0 = 0 532
Off Topic / Re: Journalists Going Micro Also« on: January 09, 2010, 04:34 »
Isn't Globalization wonderful! If you want to put it into historical context then the free market idea of Adam Smith is the real winner . . . what we have here is the peasants fighting for the last wild boar in the King's forest . . . . and every hungry peasant is invited.
533
General Stock Discussion / Re: again a new agency workingtitleimages.com« on: January 07, 2010, 17:44 »Unfortunately no million$ to spare, just a love of what we do and a belief that life is too short ~ regrets are worthless. I know the feeling after being in the fine art world as a painter for 30 years, . . . so I like your attitude as an unemployable free thinker. Your problem is that you have to convince people your site is serious and worth THEIR time to contribute. 534
Yaymicro / Re: Images disappearing..this time at Yaymicro« on: December 29, 2009, 03:17 »
The same for me at Yaymicro, during the day they appear . . . then they disappear . . . then they appear again . . . on and on and on . . .
They have a little work to do at Yaymicro after the holidays. 535
General Stock Discussion / Re: trojan horse at Istock« on: December 27, 2009, 09:01 »My virus scanner (AVAST) detected a trojan horse so be aware what to do next. Thanks for the laugh! But there is a trojan horse and Avast (free) did abort it from downloading, or at least the IS site. 536
New Sites - General / Re: Stockfuel« on: December 20, 2009, 11:28 »
Now that's a fresh site. Only 1400 files!
I do like the look, well designed. 537
Veer / Re: What happens to Veer MP?« on: December 18, 2009, 07:01 »
At least for me the problem shows in this graph (245 images online), I have had some downloads but those numbers are also going down. I guess the number of online files are growing.
538
General Stock Discussion / Re: What Future?« on: December 17, 2009, 16:54 »
For myself its alittle different. After getting a science degree from university (1971) I took a personal vow to poverty and art (painting), and have been sucessful in both. For the last year I have been using a camera to satisfy my obsession with imagery, but unlike most of you here I have no love affair with the camera. It seems like a very imperfect machine. There is one great advantage in Photography . . . . . . . you don't have the fear and anxiety of the dreaded white canvas!
E 539
StockXpert.com / Re: Getty Subscription Site to replace JIUnlimited« on: December 17, 2009, 16:21 »
Well stated, that's it . . . . . . . say it ain't so, Joe. 540
Microstock Services / Re: Find who uses your photos« on: December 17, 2009, 12:13 »
Sounds great until I read this:
Run main.exe (or main.py). Select the stock. Enter your username and password for it. I'm not sure about that . . . . . . . . . 541
StockXpert.com / Re: Getty Subscription Site to replace JIUnlimited« on: December 17, 2009, 12:09 »I'm in Group Three, but the part about losing the partner program with our StockXpert port is nothing we haven't already known for at least 6 months now. I, like many others, also have very few images on istock compared to stockxpert mostly due to the weekly upload cap. Am I happy about this? Not really. Will I be losing a lot of money from this? Probably hundreds each month. Is it the end of the world? Definitely not. This tell me that, at least for the next couple of mouths, the smart thing to do is to opt-out at IS until the transfer is complete . . . . . then opt-in at IS after, if that is your intention. Does that make sense?. 542
Bigstock.com / Re: December commission = 0$« on: December 15, 2009, 09:30 »Bigstockphoto was always very low earner for me, but I had a payment almost every month. In December I have 0 dls. It has never happen before (I'm here for over 2 years). Looks like BS is slow dying. Also a goose egg for me this month after a BME last month. The promise of the SS takeover seems to be waning fast. 543
iStockPhoto.com / Re: December DL's Near ZERO (0)« on: December 13, 2009, 12:07 »
I am also a small port guy (200) and have been waiting for $ 0.78 to make payout. And waiting . . . . and waiting . . . . and waiting! I thought I had a trend going after a BME last month. So, I am waiting . . . . . . . . .
544
Crestock.com / Re: For those impatient with Crestock« on: December 09, 2009, 09:26 »After more than 2 months of image pending, my 500+ photos only approved 2... so sad. OUCH! I feel your pain. I stopped uploading months ago. They don't like enough of my stuff for me to keep interest. 545
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia and Witholding Taxes!« on: December 08, 2009, 08:38 »I'm having trouble with the w-9 form as well. I have a business license and an EIN number which I keep putting on the form but they have rejected my w-9 twice. Same thing happened to me until I supplied the number without spaces. Try that. 546
New Sites - General / Re: The 3D Studio - anyway selling there?« on: December 06, 2009, 04:43 »Somebody just asked me to comment here so I figured I would... As promised the upgrade has been finished, so thank you T3DS. With 531 images online and 27,653 views and no sales I am hopeful for the future. The site looks and feels much more user friendly, so lets get on with it . . . . 547
General Photography Discussion / Re: Monitor Calibration for Stock Photos« on: December 04, 2009, 16:26 »
RT wrote:
Take a shot of a popular subject and upload it to any agency, then go to that agency and do a search so that your image shows up amongst many similar others, if your colours look OK you're done, if not adjust your monitor. You are right . . . after getting the calibration reasonable corrected. What drives me crazy is that each site presents the images a little different. It seems to me that images on SS have slightly more contrast then IS, and DT kicks up the sharpening which brightens the image . . . . or am I seeing things? E 548
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia and Witholding Taxes!« on: December 02, 2009, 12:29 »
On your Member Area Page they added another link "Tax Center", don't know when that was added. Saw it today for the first time:
Member Area -Credits -Files -Profile -Toolbox -Affiliation -Subscription -Support -Tax Center 549
New Sites - General / Re: photocase.com« on: December 01, 2009, 05:04 »Four in my port too. I've had two downloads .... but NO MONEY. Not so sure that getting credits for uploading makes a lot of sense. Turns the site into an "exchange" agency instead of a "sales" agency. Photographers who need images usually can make their own. What's the use for all those download credits??? About the same story here. One in 15 accepted with a "file sharing" download . . . . . I am starting to loose interest already, maybe this isn't the site for me. 550
Software - General / Re: Windows 7« on: November 30, 2009, 17:06 »Really extremely useful info about the drivers Denis. Thank you! Lisafx Please let us know how you like the XPS 9000 after you get to spend some time with it . . . that is, if you indeed settle for that machine. My computer is starting to complain every time I have CS3 and Bridge open at the same time . . . . . . boy, this computer seemed like a real monster just a few years ago! I remember bragging about having 1.5 gigs of RAM. |
|