MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - oscarcwilliams
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13
276
« on: April 03, 2013, 03:50 »
The old uploading process was so much better. Now it takes me about 10 minute for each single photo to up load. So I stopped uploading there. Too bad to change a good thing. I won't waste my time there.
277
« on: April 01, 2013, 06:23 »
Are you sure this is not an April fool prank?
278
« on: March 12, 2013, 02:35 »
I'm not seeing any changes in this so call new policy either. Today I had 6 different poses of the the same subject and they all were rejected. Talk is cheap!!
279
« on: February 17, 2013, 22:02 »
It use to be a great site. The reviews were fast and we had lots of images to upload. Now I only have ten at a time to upload and it takes forever to review. What happen?
280
« on: February 08, 2013, 13:50 »
Thanks also for the early payout. It came at the right time.
281
« on: January 30, 2013, 12:52 »
I have been going back and forth with the manager at Depositphoto and they will not change back the uploading process which we all liked so much. I will not upload any more images there and requested that my portfolio be deactivated. Another sad day in microstock photography.
Anyway, as I think about it maybe it was for the best that this happened. The prices there was just too low. (XXXL--.30 cents)
282
« on: January 30, 2013, 00:03 »
Now you talking. The upsetting part again in this whole change, we the photographers were not given ANY input to the change. Also for so little money for XXL downloads (30 cents) each, this will not buy a cup of coffee these days.
It now seem that the micro stock sites are putting their foot in their mouth. "What goes around comes around".
283
« on: January 29, 2013, 18:51 »
I hate this new system. We were not warned that this would happen or given the choice between the old and new. It's also very buggy.. I just wrote support and expressed how I didn't like what they done and if I couldn't go back to the way which was easy and simple, to PULL MY WHOLE PORTFOLIO.
284
« on: November 17, 2012, 05:04 »
Yes, I am having the same problem. The reviewer must have voted for Mitt Roomey.
285
« on: October 23, 2012, 16:35 »
What's wrong with these sites? They are going to pits.
286
« on: April 21, 2012, 03:50 »
Hey guys.--I'm getting tired of wasting my time uploading to All You Can Stock and not getting any sales (only two for the first submission). I think these guys should have had a marketing plan in the very beginning--but this ain't happening.
I really think it will never get off the ground --so I will stop uploading my work there. Too bad because at the beginning with the initial (2) sales I had it really made me feel good about the site, but now I feel like I just got shafted!!
Please send your thoughts and feedback.
Thanks.
287
« on: April 03, 2012, 19:19 »
The same thing happened to me. I had three sales after first uploading around xmas 2011. That's not good. They are very friendly and the site looks good but now it's time to" show us the money."
I think now is the time to start asking them if this is a waste of our precious time in uploading our great images. Start showing us some views and buyers.
288
« on: March 25, 2012, 05:52 »
I have the same problem now going on two days . I called Joseph at support and he said it would be fixed in 24 hours. Nothing yet. What's going on with these micro sites? They all are breaking down. They are making enough money off our work -- so things should be fixed ASAP.
289
« on: January 30, 2012, 10:52 »
Is the site down at All You Can Stock?
290
« on: September 01, 2011, 23:28 »
What's with all these rejections at Dreamstime? They increase our uploads and reject everything. Anyone else feel shafted like I do?
291
« on: June 30, 2011, 16:20 »
Is anyone having a problem uploading a model release to Canstock today?
292
« on: February 05, 2010, 20:49 »
Is anyone using Viewbug? Have you won a contest or sold an image there?
Thanks, Oscar
293
« on: January 21, 2010, 06:30 »
Just returned from Amsterdam from shooting stock images using my Canon 5dII, I submitted 40 plus great images and only (2) were accepted while the others were rejected with the reason "the quality of the images is not what we desire". I'm getting real frustrated now with the changing price structure and all the tons of rejections at fotolia. Why even bother to upload and waste your time when you know what the outcome will be?
Do anyone else have this experience?---and please give feedback.
294
« on: September 19, 2009, 10:46 »
Is anyone having a problem uploading to Stockphotomedia this weekend?s
295
« on: September 09, 2008, 16:26 »
I like the old one better.
296
« on: August 08, 2008, 11:52 »
It took me at least (15) times before I got in three months ago. Don't give up.
297
« on: July 17, 2008, 14:26 »
Thanks so much Oboy, you really saved my day.---Oscar
298
« on: July 17, 2008, 13:19 »
Please name the microstock sites that accept editorial images. Example: Barack Obama
299
« on: April 25, 2008, 13:17 »
It's fixed now.
300
« on: April 25, 2008, 13:03 »
Same here. There has been no words from adm. about this problem.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|