MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Red Dove

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31]
751
Canon / Re: Canon 85mm 1.8 versus Tamron 90mm macro
« on: September 05, 2009, 16:20 »
Much obliged. I have to admit the 85mm looks good on the web. I'll just have to stump up for a macro down the line.

Have a good one  :)

752
Illustration - General / Re: New to illustrations
« on: September 05, 2009, 16:14 »
Quote
Hi all I am interested in learning illustrations and vector art.
Any advice on how to get started?

Spend 4 years at art school.
Unless you are exceptionally talented you will get nowhere otherwise (see all the 2nd rate vector artists clogging up all the sites and getting next to no sales)

Late to this thread. But I don't understand where this response comes from. In the UK there are thousands of designers who went through Art School for four years and have never found employment (I happen to sit about fifty feet away from one and all he does is chase invoice payment) - so this does not entirely equate.  Also, some of the top designers in the UK have no formal "art" education yet somehow manage to make a serious wedge of money. If someone has ambition and focus, I say go for it.


Yes there is a lot of crap - yet crap sells surprisingly well....and art school graduates are buying it.

753
Canon / Canon 85mm 1.8 versus Tamron 90mm macro
« on: September 05, 2009, 15:33 »
Hello,

I'm looking to buy a prime lens for portraits/general purpose and I've seen a lot of praise for the Canon 85mm 1.8 in this forum. However, I've also read great reviews for the Tamron Macro on the web - it has been described as a great general purpose/portrait lens, as well as macro.

At present I don't have a macro and the Tamron appeals to me in that respect. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Cheers

754
Newbie Discussion / Re: What studio shots sell the best?
« on: September 02, 2009, 06:02 »
You'll see I'm a newbie. Before I decided RF was an opportunity I spent hours trawling the microstock sites - and one of the first things you notice is all the isolated/white background stuff. My reaction was "oooh I could do that." Then you start to realise how many times it's been done in a gazillion different ways. Apples,phones,pencils even hula dancers.

So, whilst I haven't written studio objects off (I also have a notebook full of thumbnail sketches), I have decided to build my stock from the outside world. It's worked for me in RM and fine art (to a small degree - but steadily improving) and it seems to work very well in Micro if you get it right.

I suppose my message is not to get hooked on one thing this late in the game. A lot of it has been sewn up this past seven years and for me versatility and originality is the way to break through.

Brainstorm ideas until you have to go and lie down to recover.

Good luck.



755
Tom - comprehensive and informed advice. Very much appreciated and taken on board.

Have a good week.

Ed

756
I just wanted to add that despite my bitter and frustrated response on here (and laughing at the clip), I try to always be polite to potential clients. Even if their offer is totally ridiculous or they try to insult me. I just think it is not professional and a complete waste of time to argue with potential clients. I just try to answer all their questions in a cordial way, even if I don't think I'm going to end up doing the job. Hey, you never know, so you might as well be nice.

Agreed. I was polite, gave them my price and a commercial reason for doing so,wished them luck in their endeavours. If they come back it's because they see value in my work and are not in the business of accumulating a free database of images.

Liked the dude clip. And in reply to another post - yes dude I am a novice, ergo (it's in the dictionary) I seek and generally recieve professional advice in this forum - and I'm very grateful for it. Sweet.


757
It is interesting how some people can call this kind of crap an opportunity. If I were you I would tell them to come back when they are ready to pay you. If I am going to miss an opportunity for that kind of response then so be it!


Agreed again. I'm new to this business but rapidly understanding I have to be as hard-nosed about this as I was when working in sales. Anyway, I've written back advising them I will contribute at standard UK journalism rates. I'm not going to accept any magic beans for my cow.

Thanks

758
Yep - I really should learn from my recent experience with a brief (lawyer). He had a clock and a calculator within easy reach and he used them all the time, every time.

 :)

759
Perry - brilliant clip. Fortunately I haven't fallen off the turnip truck.

All - my gut feel about this is confirmed, which is why I'm ignoring their follow-up email. If they ask again I'll give them a price and they'll either go away or agree a way forward - on my terms.

As my Aunt Florence would say "you get nothing for nothing in this world my boy"

Cheers,
Ed

760
A New York based web magazine has asked me to contribute some of my work to their website and "possible" publication in a hard copy magazine they expect to launch around November. I'm chuffed at the invitation and to me it presents an opportunity for some free marketing. The quality of photography on their site is generally high and they seem to be genuine.

However, I'm in two minds about giving away images. They are a start-up so I'm guessing cash is going into the launch. They say they plan to start paying contributors if the magazine picks up additional sponsorship.

Has anyone come across this in the business? Am I missing an opportunity if I pass on this.

Kind Regards.

761
2nd post - but this is really important for me. The posts from Power and Paulie are bang on. I also had a think about conversations I've had with people who say "why can't I take photographs like you?" And my reply is always along the lines - you can if you get up at 4:00 am, are prepared to spend money on pro,semi-pro kit, go through a vertical learning curve and can't sleep at night if you haven't made at least one good picture that day.

If they see those as obstacles they are not prepared to overcome they never ask again - but they might buy your prints instead ;)

762
As a newbie and when I was first enquiring, I would like to have been given the harsh facts as well as the positives. A lot of the bloggers put a rosy glow on the business along the lines of "I shot this in my kitchen with a reflector made from tin foil and a standard desk lamp" - I suppose it ramps up their visit counter and encourages more sponsorship for them.

Some of the big boys and girls are more upfront about the hard work, adaptability, skill levels and self learning required. But it took me some digging to find out the drop-out rate (more than 75% I reckon) or to get any idea of the numbers of people who take months if not years to reach their first payout.

Its only due to the generosity and kindness of some members of this site that I have any idea if this is a viable business. I still believe it is but now have a more balanced view of what it takes to earn some lolly. So the harsh facts if you please - in a kind way.

True story: when Michael Caine was a delivery driver he dropped off some boxes at EMI Film Studios, took a look at all the flash cars outside and when he recognised a minor actor, grabbed him by the arm and said. "How do you get into this bleeding acting lark then?.


Cheers

763
It's enough to put me off Microstock before I've even got started.  :-[

Good.

Sir Locke,

I can see you have very little to worry about when it comes to competition - but your reply has motivated me to give RF a crack. Whether it was intended to or not.

Have a good weekend.

Ed




764
Thanks David.

Regarding Madelaide's original post. It's a very forward-thinking suggestion - "freebies" are a proven business model. I base that on a working life spent selling everything from Computers to people (as a recruitment consultant - not a pimp).

There is a cost outlay but anything that links back to your product/service is a good thing in my book. I once read an article by a UK photographer who generated a lot of interest in his Fine Art photography by donating free images to small businesses;cafes,garages,doctor's surgeries etc across several counties.

It's not sustainable as a full-time practice but does uplift sales and with hard work and luck you can use that spike in activity as a springboard.

Cheers,Ed


765
I'm new to this forum but one thing is immediately clear, almost every thread dissolves into a row over how much everyone get's paid and RF versus RM.

It's enough to put me off Microstock before I've even got started.  :-[

766
Photo Critique / Re: Sharp enough?
« on: August 08, 2009, 18:19 »
Phil - your time and effort is much appreciated. Very useful and very kind of you. I need to buy Ninja I reckon.

Magnum - I will try and upload a 100% crop tomorrow - it's past midnight here and I'm knackered.

Michaelo - I appreciate your honest opinion.

Perseu - Again, thanks for your advice, I had a feeling the wall behind the vines would give me a problem. I tried to move the leaves to cover it up but no go, didn't have any gaffer tape in my bag :) - your solution is much appreciated.

"He who dares wins"

Thanks, Ed

767
Photo Critique / Sharp enough?
« on: August 08, 2009, 13:20 »
Ladies and Gents,

I would appreciate your opinions please. I'm not submitting the image in question (not entirely happy with the composition) but would like a view on the quality of the image. Is it sharp enough? Is it free from noise? I think it is - but want to be sure my checks at 100% are right and my JPEG's are turning out okay. Also, any comment on colour etc would be gratefully appreciated.

100% view available at this link. I shoot RAW 100% and carry out minimal processing before compression.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/trees_are/3801186982/#

Yours in anticipation,

768
Lighting / Re: What Light Stand for Speedlite/Flash please
« on: July 30, 2009, 02:52 »
I'm in London and we get royally shafted on price for Cameras and accessories compared to the US and Canada -  so I'm not going to get the same bargain on these sets. I'll definitely have a look at these though. Much obliged for the advice.

769
Lighting / What Light Stand for Speedlite/Flash please
« on: July 29, 2009, 14:34 »
Need a new light stand for my Canon speedlite. Use Manfrotto/Bogen as a rule but looking at the Giottos range as they have air-dampened columns. Wondered if anyone could recommend or have any other suggestions. Budget around $150

770
Unfortunately this isn't just about whether you might be a terrorist or not. There is a level of paranoia in the UK (mostly generated by the press) about the taking of any pictures that contain children in public places, no matter how innocent your intentions.

Photos have appeared on websites frequented by the deviants of our society and naturally the authorities are on the lookout for this activity.

Best to produce your ID or ask for permission to make photographs. It's sad but is not likely to go away tomorrow so we have to adapt.




771
General Photography Discussion / Re: Importance of Tripod
« on: July 27, 2009, 16:02 »
I'm not a Pro but I do know one who makes a living out of landscape and architecture photography. His advice to me was buy a tripod and a remote release if I ever hope to make a professional landscape image. Believe me you'll see the difference at 100%

I've never heard of a street photographer using a tripod. All it takes is some clown to trip over a leg and you'll be needing to hire a lawyer. I've seen guys in London using monopods, beanbags, going down on one knee, using walls, fences, railings to support the camera or their body. Even with a fast lens you want to be sharp.

772
Newbie Discussion / Re: Sizing images for submission
« on: July 27, 2009, 15:25 »
Etien. Your advice is much appreciated. I am a beginner as far as digital is concerned :P

773
Newbie Discussion / Sizing images for submission
« on: July 27, 2009, 14:53 »
Dear Photographers, I haven't submitted a damned thing to any stock sites yet but I'm getting there. My stumbling block is the image size requirements. All sites as far as I can see require JPEG with a minimum size of 4 or 6 MB and 72 dpi (although I think that's out of date) and strictly NO up sizing.

Now, I shoot RAW and image size is 3888 x 2592 and when I convert to JPEG generally end up with a 6MB file at 350 dpi output. My question is, have you any tips about file size or have I got it right as far as Microstock is concerned?

Would appreciate your sage advice.

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors