|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - trek
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 30
101
« on: November 30, 2019, 12:52 »
My understanding from reading the photographers guide to copyright is that selling a print of your own work is not considered to be "publishing" and so you can sell prints (at least in the USA) of anything you have taken. It is the act of "publishing" that bring the potential risks of infringing on trademarks or needing releases etc.
By the way, I've just published my own monthly report on video sales today. I always wait until the month finally ends to do my main report. The video one is here:
https://www.backyardsilver.com/2019/11/video-stock-sales-in-november-2019/
Steve
FAA also sells mugs, hats, shirts, shower curtains, bags.. etc.,. It's not just art prints. I think merchandise and one off art prints have different risk factors when it comes to editorial. You can turn the products auto function off.. but generally I don't post editorial content there.
102
« on: November 26, 2019, 20:08 »
All the revenue sharing sites I've seen are tied to unlimited subscriptions... where buyers (and thieves) can download thousand of videos or images a month for a few pennies each. That's why I stay away from those sites.
103
« on: November 20, 2019, 07:03 »
I don't see Canva referenced anymore. Did they end their Getty deal?
104
« on: November 11, 2019, 17:08 »
I'm thinking about dropping Depositphotos. It's annoying that I'm almost only getting 0.32 commissions. It's quite low. And sometimes even lower ones appear, like 0.16. Very rarely I get something bigger, but it's too infrequent to move the average significantly. Nowadays my RPD is around 0.37 USD which is very low. Image RPD at Shutterstock for example is usually quite close to 1 USD
DepositPhotos is the lowest return per download of the 10 agencies my material is at. Wish they were better. Not investing workflow time with them at this point.
105
« on: November 11, 2019, 08:00 »
Another issue I have with BB is when my clips get reviewed, it says "online" in my admin panel. But, online where? Which agencies took the clips? Which agencies rejected any?
And if some were rejected, what was the reason? Perhaps it was something that could be fixed simply and resubmitted, but I don't know what the issue was or from where the rejection came from.
That's a big concern. Especially with Shutterstock's recent rejection of photo releases over penmanship and correctable minutia. I wouldn't want to left in the dark if old releases need replacement.
106
« on: November 10, 2019, 21:43 »
I like the revenue share (for co-productions) function. Is there a payout minimum?
The revenue sharing is the only reason I'd use BB. I wish agencies did this themselves.
And no, I got a $4.66 payout from them once.
Thanks for the reply. Another question: Are there restrictions regarding removing existing material from the agencies and then re-uploading those clips to Blackbox?
107
« on: November 10, 2019, 21:00 »
I'm thinking of trying a test batch. I like the revenue share (for co-productions) function. Is there a payout minimum?
108
« on: November 10, 2019, 06:43 »
I love BB as well and the 15% is a wash as you get a higher % from SS per download as you would on your own.
Does Blackbox eliminate the $1.50 video downloads? How does the SS return per download at Blackbox compare to uploading directly to SS (@ 30% royalty level)?
109
« on: November 07, 2019, 05:59 »
I think it's a program, I'm pretty sure now.
An egyptian obelisk rejected because I have not translated the hieroglyphs on the title.
A bell tower of an European Cathedral rejected because of trademark violation in title and keywords.
A 13th century architect still generating royalties.
I had a night cityscape rejected because a tiny little street sign that said "Yosemite Ave" was "untranslated foreign text". AI - machine rejections are a lame waste of time.
110
« on: October 30, 2019, 10:23 »
P5 income - year to date is 28% below last year. FYI: I removed my video port from istock and storyblocks. Never placed videos at Evanto due to low pricing.
U r wrong , i can set my own prices to Envatomarket (Videohive)  but i never sold a regular clip just animations. [/quote] Your right. They didn't used to let contributors set video prices but it seems you can now. However my experience as a Photodune contributor ended poorly. I will not resume contributing to Evanto.
111
« on: October 30, 2019, 06:07 »
P5 is alright for me. Lower sales in number than SS but higher net/file so I am satisfied with them. Those that complain and have their clips in places like Istock Envato Elements Storyblocks etc should really be quiet because those sites are an important contributor to the erosion of well paying sites.
P5 income - year to date is 28% below last year. FYI: I removed my video port from istock and storyblocks. Never placed videos at Evanto due to low pricing.
112
« on: October 23, 2019, 07:02 »
This wont help your current issue but...
My understanding is that: Paypal's 1099K are issued when there are 20K in earnings and 200 transactions in a calendar year. I'm careful to keep the transaction number below 200.
113
« on: October 12, 2019, 20:37 »
My video return per download dropped to about $3- shortly before I removed my clips.
114
« on: October 05, 2019, 10:54 »
My skyline cityscapes usually contain 30 or more signs, billboards, and murals. I clone them all away to create commercially usable material. The end product is quite altered. True editorial content should have no cloning at all. Please consider loosening the acceptable editorial policy to include "clone free" skylines and cityscapes.
115
« on: September 29, 2019, 14:04 »
Alex is a writer and writers write. Creative people need to create. His blog is informative. I appreciate his insight.
116
« on: September 20, 2019, 11:30 »
Go to Sales, then click Gross Royalty to reorder your sales from least amount, so the larges refund comes at the top. Ignore the probably many 'refunds' you got in Jan 2017: these were apparently never sales, it was just Getty testing the system when it was introduced to iS. 
I also cannot see any refunds, but clearly do not understand what I am seeing.
I start at the ESP login, the go to "royalties." I don't see a place to see 'sales' or what was sold or for what price? (I attached a screenshot, but it does not seem to show up here...)
They don't want you to see. You need to download the txt document. I open it in excel.
117
« on: September 20, 2019, 05:41 »
No refunds, but worst amount this year, less than half of July (but with the same number of downloads).
I suppose the video doesn't go to Canva, so no refunds right?
I had four video refunds this month.. despite removing my video portfolio in April.
118
« on: September 19, 2019, 17:31 »
456 Canva entries. About half are refunds. Lunacy.
119
« on: September 05, 2019, 13:04 »
Hello all! Please help - how to delete images from bigstock? tried, spent time - cannot delete, and for editing they ask for reasons. I want to spend time once for deleting
No way to self delete at Bigstock. Support has to do it for you.
120
« on: August 30, 2019, 14:07 »
By the technical or artistic side, you are totally correct @trek
But an agency is a company, accountants that counts products and assets. And they love to see and show numbers grow. Perhaps i am wrong though
I think your right. I think they want to brag about a billion image library (even if it's half crap).
121
« on: August 30, 2019, 14:01 »
Why should they delete products that payed people to curate and stored for a long time? Further why should upset people that spend time to shoot, upload keyowrk and list them?
Bulk sales, lowest prices and resolutions seems a better idea. Guess this already happened?
After all, deleting all unsold would actually reduce marketplaces to a big reset point.
Why.. to get rid of insanely redundant low quality material that frustrates buyers. If it hasn't sold in 10 years I say trash it.
122
« on: August 30, 2019, 13:56 »
Regarding Dreamstime: That's because most their files never sell these days. They were also using the unsold - delete ploy to get people to donate to their "free" section.
123
« on: August 30, 2019, 13:13 »
Since I have read things like this in this forum, ........ If you do not know English well, do not use irony..... or in my comments, recommend that you do not use the google translator, because my intention to participate in this forum is not valued,...... I decided to leave the comments for the usual four others and simply read, as 99% of the users of this forum do.
That said, I entered here probably the last time, because I liked your approach. I simply want to add, that today, it is more expensive for the websites to delete the files. The price of keeping them in the server is null for the storage capacity of these days. Deleting files is laborious and costs money.
Deleting files could be fast and easy if they simply delete unsold files after ___ years.
124
« on: August 27, 2019, 06:24 »
FYI: Pond 5 has a "Global Partner Program". The click box is located in account preferences. You might be opted in by default.
125
« on: August 22, 2019, 16:13 »
I'm not in favor of the subscription model but I think sites like Photoshelter could add a monthly subscription pricing tool for individual contributors if they wanted to.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 30
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
