MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - scottbraut

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
176
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock down?
« on: January 17, 2013, 21:03 »
Hello All,

Thanks.

We're aware there's an issue and we're working on it.  We'll update as we know more and a solution is put into place.

Thanks,

Scott
VP Content

177
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutter Shifted the Popular Images Today
« on: January 15, 2013, 15:09 »
Hello Everyone,

Thanks for your detailed feedback...it has been very helpful.

We've been looking into this and we found an issue that started a few days ago with a normal refresh of our search records. The effect of the issue is that some older popular images are ranking higher than they should be. This was an issue with the normal refresh and not a change made to our search algorithms. The team has already identified and implemented a solution.  Only a portion of the collection was affected and you should see the impact of the solution as early as today, though it may take a few days for everything to be 100% back to normal.

Thanks again for your help and patience as we resolve this.

Best Regards,

Scott
VP Content
Shutterstock

178
Shutterstock.com / Re: New upload system buggy as hell
« on: November 27, 2012, 08:48 »
Hello,

If you are having issues uploading and haven't already done so, please email our support team.

http://submit.shutterstock.com/contact.mhtml

Any details that you can provide will be helpful in having the team reproduce and address the issue (browser version, FTP client, file type, your sequence of actions, etc....).

Thanks, and we apologize for any inconvenience!

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

179
Bigstock.com / Re: Bridge to Bigstock. He No Workee?
« on: November 16, 2012, 10:20 »
Thanks guys,

I'll look into this.  As always, please report any issue like this to the support team (in this case, either Bigstock or Shutterstock).  But I'll ask the team to look into it.

Best,

Scott
VP Content
Shutterstock

180
Shutterstock.com / Re: Different numbers in approved images
« on: October 21, 2012, 09:15 »
Hey guys,

I'll ask the team to provide an answer (likely not until tomorrow), but it's also possible that the number represents images that were approved ever.    If an image was subsequently removed by the user, or rejected for a trademark or some other reason during a regular audit, you would have less active images being sold.

I'm speculating; I'll clarify with the developers that built the functionality.  I suspect it could also be the issue mentioned earlier, which is that some images were recently approved, but haven't been indexed for search yet.

Best,

Scott
VP of Content


181
Hi All,

This should be fixed now.  As always, please report any additional issues.  We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience!

Best,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

182
Shutterstock.com / Re: Upload not working at SS
« on: September 30, 2012, 22:56 »
Hello All,

Upload should be working now.  Please contact Support if you experience any issues.  We apologize for any inconvenience.

Best Regards,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

183
Shutterstock.com / Re: Horrible new bug at SS
« on: August 30, 2012, 15:49 »
Hello All,

The broken thumbnails should be fixed now.  Our apologies for the inconvenience.

Best,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

184
Shutterstock.com / Re: Horrible new bug at SS
« on: August 30, 2012, 09:13 »
Hi All,

Our tech teams are currently working on this.  Thanks for your patience and we hope to have an update soon.

Best,

Scott

VP of Content
Shutterstock

185
Dear Community,

While we don't typically reply to forum posts, from time to time we believe it is important to correct misleading or incorrect information that may be meaningful to our contributors and customers.  For the record, the effective royalty rate we pay our contributors varies based on product type, customer usage, currency exchange rates and other factors.  In aggregate, it is generally in the range of 25%-30% of net revenue, not the 20% rate that was previously suggested.
 
As always, we appreciate your contributions and we're excited to provide value to such a great community of artists. 

Best Regards,


Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

186
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock 120$ comission...! wow!
« on: August 17, 2012, 09:48 »
Hi All,

When you receive a high royalty for a single image, it is because the image was sold under a license that offers the option for sensitive use. That does not mean that the use was a sensitive one.  The majority of these images will not be used in a sensitive manner.  However, such use is a possibility. Unlike some competitors, we give you the ability to opt-out.  

High royalties are often the result of a prenegotiated agreement with volume buyers such as large advertising agencies.  These volume buyers may require additional license or workflow features, such as the option for sensitive use, indemnification, multi-user accounts, prenegotiated pricing, and special billing and workflow features.  

By opting-in to sensitive use, you get access to all sales made to these buyers.  By opting out, your images aren't available to buyers who require the option of sensitive use.

Overall, these sales are a great opportunity to drive additional revenue to you and we're excited to make them available.  :)

Best,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock
 

187
Hi All,

If the request came from Shutterstock internally, there are typically two possibilities.  One is that it's a request for product or policy research, in which we're asking for your input on new initiatives, workflow prototypes, etc...  The second possibility is that we're asking for you to participate in the marketing of your work (for example, we've got a "featured contributor" on the footage homepage and we feature contributors and collections on the blog and in newsletters).  

As always, if you're confused about any communication, it's best to reach out directly to the sender (checking to make sure it came from Shutterstock) or direct your questions to Support at "submit (at) Shutterstock.com."

Best Regards,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock


  

188
Hello,

The feed will likely grow to be a mix of specific and broad requests. 

Often, a customer will come to us and say, "you know, I was working on a project on Brazilian travel last month and noticed that you don't have a lot of local culture.  Many of my projects need authentic-looking photos that show Brazilians in business or at leisure.   If you had that in the future, I'm sure I'd be able to download more images." 

Other times, the request might be, "I need six children on a single team in blue shirts." 

And more often than that, the request might be very broad -- but important -- "we need images that show authentic-looking lifestyles...nothing too 'stocky.'"

Our goal is to mix these up to give you not only a sense of what specific items customers will be looking for, but also a sense of broad categories that have a high likelihood of getting downloads in the future. 

We'll mix it up.  ;)  As with anything, this should also mature and grow over time and feedback is always helpful.  Our ultimate goal is to create a connection between contributors and customer requests, as well as our own analysis of gaps in the collection.

Best,

Scott

189
Hello,

Contributors often ask what kind of content were looking for, so to make it easy, weve created a Twitter feed to answer exactly that question. Well be tweeting out specific content needs (for photos, video and illustrations) as they come in, and the rest is up to you. Visit this link to follow @ShutterstockReq. (Tip: Even if you dont have Twitter, you can check the page periodically to find out what were looking for.)

Twitter feed:
https://twitter.com/shutterstockreq

More details:
http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/what-content-are-we-looking-for-follow-shutterstockreq-on-twitter-to-find-out

Best Regards,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock
@shutterstock
@shutterstockreq
@scottbraut

190
Shutterstock.com / Re: Strange rules/rejection at SS
« on: June 06, 2012, 09:41 »
Hello All,

Sorry for the delay.  

Regarding questions that came up about our policy with respect to public domain images:

Public domain images are typically those images for which the copyright has expired. Generally, it is safe to say that any image (published or unpublished) created before 1892 or by a U.S. artist who died prior to 1942 is in the public domain in the United States. It is not however easy to determine if an image fits those criteria and is in fact in the public domain.  As copyright laws vary from country to country, determining the copyright status of images created outside of the United States is more complex.  

Unfortunately, researching and verifying the copyright status of public domain images is not practical as part of the review process. On occasion, our policies have attempted to be more forgiving, but we can no longer accept public domain images.  For the foreseeable future we will be adhering to our existing guidelines, which prominently state "submissions must be wholly owned by the submitter. Found or public domain images or footage cannot be submitted under any circumstances."

http://submit.shutterstock.com/guidelines.mhtml

Thanks for your understanding and we sincerely apologize for any confusion.

There are no plans to remove public domain images that are currently in the collection, but we reserve the right to do so as we perform routine reviews and quality assurance.  

In addition, thank you for the feedback regarding our other review policies and communications.  As always, our goal is to have and maintain the best submission experience and your feedback is helpful.

Best Regards,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

191
Shutterstock.com / Re: Strange rules/rejection at SS
« on: June 04, 2012, 16:33 »
Hi All,

I've been discussing this with the team and should be able to follow up by end-of-day tomorrow.

Thanks for your patience!    

Best,

Scott

192
Shutterstock.com / Re: Strange rules/rejection at SS
« on: June 03, 2012, 15:41 »
Hi folks,

I'm looking into this one - I'll post what I find out.

Best,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

193
Thanks Scott, but that doesnt cut it for me at all!
What determines the prices of these licenses?

To clarify, these licenses are part of individually negotiated sales to high-volume buyers. Pricing may be based on the volume of images being requested, the nature of the anticipated use (for example, advertising vs. editorial publishing), the level of commitment from the buyer, the need for multi-user accounts, and such things as special billing and workflow features. In addition, we have already noted the option for sensitive use.

We dont publish the details of any one sale, but we hope this provides general insight into some of the factors that are considered in custom pricing. 

Best Regards,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

194
Hello,

As promised, we've posted a brief summary of these license types on our blog:

http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/individual-image-licenses-update

Best Regards,

Scott

195
Hello All,

These licenses are sometimes part of custom or volume licenses that do not include a sensitive use option. We apologize for any confusion.  Were putting together a more detailed explanation of the different license types which we will communicate on our blog next week.

Best Regards,

Scott
VP of Content
Shutterstock

196
Shutterstock recently sponsored a 24-hour "Hack-A-Thon" for employees.  Everyone in the company was given 24 hours to come up with any idea and execute it.  

The Shutterstock footage team "4:3" created and produced this mixed-media short overnight, in just 24 hours:



Read more about the short here.

Enjoy!  

SITE IMPROVEMENTS:

You'll notice that we've also begun to make some of many expected improvements to the footage site.   We're starting with customer-facing features, such as the footage homepage, pricing page, and sign-up process.  Additional improvements will be released in the coming months.  

http://footage.shutterstock.com/

FEATURED CONTRIBUTOR:

This month, we've also featured contributor Sean Prior at Shutterbuzz:
http://buzz.shutterstock.com/sean-prior

As always, our customers are always looking for new clips and we're looking forward to your submissions.
http://submit.shutterstock.com/

More exciting things to come... :)

Best Regards,

Scott
GM, Shutterstock Footage

197
Hello,

One thing I'd like to add here if it's not already clear: for people opted-in, it's the Bridge "to" Bigstock.   We don't sync Bigstock images back to Shutterstock.   We simply check to see if Shutterstock images are already in the Bigstock collection when they get submitted and de-duplicate those.

Best,

Scott 

198
Hi guys,

Once you've opted in, we "de-duplicate" images between Shutterstock and Bigstock.  Essentially, there's an image analysis that measures attributes of the image to determine if the two images are the same within a certain threshold. 

There are a few occasions where there might be false identifications (for example, if someone uploads multiple versions of a basketball on a white background), but those are specific circumstances in which images had very similar attributes.

In terms of differences between review standards - those should go down with time or might simply reflect the specific reviewer you've gotten.  There are different reviewers at each service, but they're under a single umbrella "Content" team and our goal is to have consistent and shared standards for each.

199
Hello all,

A few replies to earlier questions:

On Keywords

It's OK to use the same keywords for both Shutterstock and Bigstock images. The main difference right now is that Bigstock supports both titles and descriptions (subheadlines) in addition to a caption, which helps the Bigstock search engine calculate relevance in a slightly different way than what is done at Shutterstock.

We suggest paying close attention to general guidelines (some are linked below).  If there are discrepancies, they're probably historical in nature from a time that the two services were fully independent companies.  We now have a single over-arching content team with separate (but cooperating) review teams for each service. The goal (and nurtured practice) is to have shared standards for each.  

Bridge images go through one review process -- not two -- which would hypothetically open up the Bigstock queue for faster review times, since we've invited some high-volume Shutterstock folks to submit only once via the Bridge program (I haven't checked on the effect of this).  


Keyword tips:
http://www.bigstockphoto.com/blog/theupload/2010/07/keyword-tips/
http://submit.shutterstock.com/newsletter/124/article3.html  (there are additional keywording links at the bottom)


On Invites

We're still inviting contributors in phases, but as originally indicated, the program is predominately focused on a modest number of high-volume and/or high-performance contributors.   There are various reasons for this, including the fact that we have to process and de-duplicate images (which takes both staff time and server processing resources), and the fact that we're purposefully not duplicating the collections.  

So far, the program has been proceeding very positively.


Best,

Scott

 

200
Bigstock.com / Re: Bigstock customer survey
« on: February 25, 2011, 12:20 »
Hi Warren,

We just made the change, so an announcement will be coming soon.

Best,

Scott

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors