pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - scottbraut

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10
201
Bigstock.com / Re: Bigstock customer survey
« on: February 25, 2011, 11:47 »
Hello Fotonaut,

Thanks for the feedback and we've got some good news.  

As you mentioned, we are performing a pricing survey right now to ensure that we're providing the right products at the right price for our customers.  That should provide continued growth at Bigstock and more sales for our contributors.

The survey you received focuses on pricing, but we are doing significant work on the content quality and quantity front:

  • We launched the Bridge to Bigstock program.
  • The collection has grown to 6.4 million images -- adding 2.4 million images in a little over a year.
  • We moved to a new search engine that is much more accurate and returns higher-quality results than the prior search engine.
  • NEW! We just lowered the payout threshold to $30 to help our entire contributor base realize their earnings faster.
  • We've standardized our review policies in close collaboration with Shutterstock.
  • We launched new upload tools last year with keyboard shortcuts and better support for batch editing, etc...
  • We launched better sales and download reporting for contributors to analyze their performance.
  • We launched a new blog, The Upload, and a new newsletter to provide informational material to contributors on creating high-quality, salable images.
  • We're doing more to highlight the great images in the collection.
  • We translated our interface into two more customer languages, German and Spanish, which included our contributor area.

We know that there are a few more items that have been requested, but we're working hard every day to create one the best marketplaces in the industry for stock images!  :)

Best,

Scott
Bigstock

202
Bigstock.com / Re: Kudos for Big Stock
« on: February 09, 2011, 11:19 »
Thanks Warren,

I'll pass this to the content and review team and I'm sure they'll appreciate it.   :)

Best,

Scott

203
Bigstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's "Bridge to Bigstock" program
« on: January 19, 2011, 15:45 »
Lightscribe - you make an important point and I think the answer is somewhere in between.  

From the perspective of a search engine, metadata is critical to showing *accurate* results.  For example,

-----
Title: Red Rose

Description: Macro closeup of a single open red rose  

Keywords: affection, anniversary, background, beautiful, beauty, bloom, blossom, botanical, closeup, color, decoration, elegant, floral, flower, fresh, gift, holiday, love, macro, nature, passion, petal, plant, red, romance, romantic, rose, single, texture, valentine, natural
-----

From the search engine perspective, the system knows that this is definitely a red rose; it should be a single red rose; and it's a macro or closeup image.   The search engine now also knows that it might be related to the concept of a "gift" or "romance," but those concepts are loosely related.  If this were a gift box, then the title would be "Gift Box" and the description would be "Single gift box with Christmas wrapping paper."   The system would then know that the image is definitely a gift box (etc..., etc...) and probably has a Christmas theme, etc..., differentiating it from the first photo - a red rose that might be given as a gift.  

If people *accurately* enter metadata, this should create very (relevant) search results.  Arguments could be made that the "short titles" should be more robust for SEO purposes, but in general, that will work.

Now if people rush through metadata, it's a moot point.   But everyone should keep in mind that metadata is how people find your images. If you put in *inaccurate*metadata, you'll just frustrate buyers and dilute the overall search experience for everyone.  If you put in insufficient metadata, when a buyer searches for "single red rose white background," your image might not come up and you'll lose the sale.

None of this is really a secret, but good metadata practices are something that the top sellers often use to their advantage.  

As always, our policies might get relaxed, but we're here to help and to ensure the best experience for both our contributors and buyers.  We want you to be successful...creating a good search experience is a shared effort.

 

204
Bigstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's "Bridge to Bigstock" program
« on: January 16, 2011, 22:55 »
Hi guys,

ON KEYWORDING:

I completely agree that keyword spam can be an issue, which is why you'll see me use the words "accurate" and "relevant" whenever talking about metadata.  The goal is to provide robust metadata that's accurate.   We always argue for best practices and responsible keywording in our tutorials and blogs:

http://www.bigstockphoto.com/blog/theupload/2010/07/keyword-tips/

An isolated object might be a tough example, but I'd argue that even a single object could have a better description, such as "Single raw potato isolated on a white background."   Or "Two baked potatoes isolated on a white background."   If you left out "single" or "one," "raw," or "baked," you'd might not appear as high in a search in which someone was looking for that specific thing. What if the buyer is looking for red potatoes instead of brown?  Detailed metadata is helpful as long as it's accurate.  

Of course - different microstock agencies use different search algorithms, and those algorithms may weigh keywords, titles and descriptions differently, so there's no guarantee that what works for one agency works for others.  

The 7-word requirement may change at some point in the future, but it's something to consider.

RE: CONTENT NEEDS

In terms of the Bridge to Bigstock, a invitee who fills "content needs" can refer to someone who has a very strong collection of images of multicultural professionals.  Or a contributor who has creative, conceptual images with very high production values (i.e., produced shoots); or an illustrator who has an extensive collection of contemporary vectors.  Those contributors aren't the focus of the program, but in the interest of transparency, we want to let people know that there might be occasions in which we might invite a contributor who is not in the highest volume category for sales or uploads.

Also, this will be a phased program and we've only invited an initial small number of contributors thus far.  Thanks for everyone's patience as we kick this off. 

Best,

Scott

205
Bigstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's "Bridge to Bigstock" program
« on: January 15, 2011, 17:05 »
Get rid of the demand of the seven word description!

Hi GRP - we may change our metadata requirements with time, but one thing I'd like to point out is that at this juncture in microstock, accurate and robust metadata is definitely your friend.  When we look at high-performing portfolios, many of the contributors with top downloads have as many as 30-40 keywords per photo, as well as carefully written titles and descriptions.

When there are hundreds of photos of a "business handshake," having a photo of a "business handshake with an African American businesswoman" gives you some room to stand out in both subject matter and search results.

I can't tell you how many times we speak with customers and they say they want "images of diversity."  I'll show the customers photos we have and some of the best images don't have critical keywords, descriptions or captions that would allow those photos to be found in search.  What a bummer!  It's pure lost sales. :(  Also - metadata plays a role in SEO as well, allowing images to appear in both Google's images search.

Even if we were to change things, I'm a big advocate for good metadata.

Best,
Scott

 

206
Bigstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's "Bridge to Bigstock" program
« on: January 15, 2011, 16:49 »
Hello,

Regarding different approvals - we get a large number of questions about that.  As of last year, there's one overall review team for both Bigstock and Shutterstock (although individual reviewers still work on each project).   We've already begun the process of putting one set of shared standards in place, as well as shared training, legal guidance, etc...

Any differences that you've seen in the past should go down (or go away) with time.

Lisa - you should upload once to Shutterstock if you've already opted in.  There's a little work that's still being done to enable the end-to-end process, but we hope to see the initial batches making their way in this week or next.

Best,
Scott


 

207
Bigstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's "Bridge to Bigstock" program
« on: January 15, 2011, 14:36 »
Hello David,

Unfortunately, the program is only for selected contributors, but it's still good news for everyone.  Some of this is covered in our answer to Matt Antonino's questions, linked below, but I'll summarize here. 

In a nutshell, the program is generally targeted at a small number of high sales / high volume contributors who most benefit from a single submission process or those who would find it difficult to move a portfolio over.  If there's a specific contributor whose work is high quality and fills a content need at Bigstock, we may go outside of the core group to invite that person as well. We're going to be inviting contributors in phases, but we won't be inviting every Shutterstock contributor.  Most of our initial invites will go out in the coming month.

There are a few reasons why we're not inviting everyone:

First, with every portfolio that we move over, we need to de-duplicate images and perform other tasks that require staff support.  A smaller invite list will keep those tasks manageable.

Second, we're intentionally not duplicating the collections.  Bigstock and Shutterstock service different kinds of customers.  We want to make sure that we provide the appropriate content for each group.

Of course, contributors with lower volume will find it more manageable to submit to both services. We made a number of improvements to the batch editing process last year and I'm confident that some more optimizations and improvements will be coming.  Your input is always considered and appreciated.  We'd like to do something for everyone.

The good news for all is that we've created this program because Bigstock is growing (as are the needs of the customer base) and we're going to be continuing to increase investments in marketing this year.  The improvements we made last year are only the beginning.  You may have noticed that we just launched (2) more languages (German and Spanish), support for (4) more currencies, and three separate domains to better service international customers.

We're already getting positive reviews in international press (in German):
http://www.fotoskaufen.de/bildagenturen/bildagentur-bigstock-test-preisvergleich.html

A few more details about the Bridge program will be found in Matt's blog here:
http://www.niltomil.com/microstock-world/bridge-bigstock-program-qa/

Needless to say, we're very excited about this year. :)

I'm always available for additional questions.

Best Regards,

Scott

208
Bigstock.com / Re: Unable to request payout at Big Stock
« on: January 04, 2011, 21:43 »
Hi guys,

It looks like one of the earlier fixes we made in the commissions area didn't take effect, so we deployed it again.  Please try again and let us know if you're still having issues.  We're not limiting any functionality right now.

As mentioned earlier, all commissions should be correct in terms of amounts.

Your commissions are:

- Total commissions generated by your downloads

Minus:
- pending payments that you've already requested
- adjustments (reversed purchases, etc...)
- "new" commissions in the 7-day, non-payable holding period (an anti-fraud measure)

= The current payable amount you can withdraw

Of course, if we didn't show you the adjustment amounts, your payable commissions could change and you wouldn't know why.  Hopefully the additional transparency is helpful for you.

If the above numbers don't seem to add up properly, please contact us.

If this area is still confusing for you and we need to adjust the interface language, just let us know. 

Best,

Scott

209
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: January 01, 2011, 23:32 »
Hello,

I'm talking with the team, but in all likelihood, we won't be able to give specific details of how fraudsters try to attack us and how we prevent those attacks. We realize that can be unsatisfying as a response, but for obvious reasons, it's very challenging (if not impossible) to release any level of security information on a public forum.  We made a general announcement via the Bigstock interface.

On the buyer side, most attempts start with a credit card number that's legitimate and able to be processed, but stolen. Many fraudsters try to appear as legitimate buyers (or mimic legitimate buying behavior) and modify their behavior once they get caught.  For that reason, fraud prevention isn't a one-time-only event...it's an ongoing process of adding and adjusting many different types of controls.
 
Best,

Scott

210
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: January 01, 2011, 22:15 »
Hi all,

The ability to withdraw commissions in a single sum is now fixed.  As was the case earlier, the commissions in your account are correct (minus any adjusted transactions due to the aforementioned issues).  Please contact us if there are any additional issues with that process.

As always, our technical and customer service teams will look at any reports of discrepancies and can answer questions.  I apologize if there has been a temporary delay in any response.  The Bigstock team is working through the weekend and the holidays, but most of our efforts in the past few days have focused on marketplace safety and deploying increasingly aggressive fraud prevention measures.   

Best,

Scott

211
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: December 31, 2010, 23:49 »
OK, the numbers look correct in your account (i.e., they add up to the right amount), but having not gone through the sequence - I'm not sure what you saw.  You're saying you had a total payable amount of $72, but your payout request only let you request $57, leaving $15 still payable?
 
I'll send this to the dev team to start them looking at it, but as stated (sorry to be a broken record) - individual issues are best sent to Support so they can reply in a single thread and track it. 

Best,

Scott

212
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: December 31, 2010, 19:48 »
Hello,

OK - the negative "payable" balances have been corrected.  **There wasn't an issue with the underlying data for your commissions.**  What happened is that that today's reversed download transactions were being included in the amount shown for the "non-payable" holding period as it appears in the interface. That made the math somewhat confusing if you checked your "payable" commission balance in Your Account.

We corrected that interface issue and now everything should look right.  Again, the underlying commissions that were payable were fine.  As always, please report if you see any discrepancies or issues to Customer Service at [email protected].

Thanks!  

Scott

213
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: December 31, 2010, 17:28 »
Hi Warren,

Since fraudulent downloads aren't uses, the most accurate response would be to say that we track and pursue copyright violations and work hard to prevent and identify fraudsters.  How we do that varies by situation once we locate the infringing use or the individual in question.

Best,

Scott

214
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: December 31, 2010, 17:15 »
Hello All,

In response to some of the earlier inquiries - unfortunately, we can't give specifics or details about security procedures.  We do have a large number of existing security checks in place and (like other e-commerce sites) we aggressively monitor and adjust them on an active basis to prevent fraud.   As you know from recent issues at iStock, fraudsters work hard to mimic legitimate customer behavior and these attempts seem to have spiked this week.    

Many of our existing prevention methods have already been successful, but we are putting increasingly restrictive controls and review procedures in place.  Our staff has been actively working through the holidays (and continues to do so) to ensure a safe selling and buying experience.

In response to negative balances - I'm going to speak with the team and we'll get that straightened out.  As mentioned earlier, please forward any details to the [email protected] e-mail address, since that will create a ticket for the team to track with details.

Best Regards,

Scott

215
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: December 31, 2010, 14:19 »

Thanks for your understanding.   It takes a little time to investigate and make the various adjustments we have to make, which is why communication can sometimes lag behind the events themselves.  In other words, we make a first priority of aggressively addressing any issue, and once we know more, we can then stop and communicate to the larger group.

Of course, there are plenty of lightning-fast forum participants around here.  :)

We do appreciate your patience in the meanwhile.   Thanks!

Best,
Scott

216
Bigstock.com / Re: Odd sales pattern here, too
« on: December 31, 2010, 12:45 »
Hi guys,

We'll follow up with additional info, but as was mentioned earlier in the thread, we're aware of this and addressing it.  We have a large number of existing controls and procedures and we're adding to them. The team has been online and working.   

Pixart - I'm not 100% sure what you're seeing, but we can look into it.  Please reach out directly to the support email address and they'll look into anything that you can't explain.

http://www.bigstockphoto.com/contactus.html

Thanks,

Scott
Bigstock

217
Off Topic / Re: Happy Holidays
« on: December 23, 2010, 13:30 »
Happy Holidays from Bigstock. :)

218
Bigstock.com / Re: Scientific/Latin names in keywords
« on: December 02, 2010, 21:39 »
Hello all,

I spoke to our content team managers and we do support (and encourage) the use of scientific names in metadata for images of animals and plants. If you check the site, you should find a large number of images with this information intact. This appears to have been a misunderstanding, for which we apologize.

The content team should be reaching out to Eco to address the specific images that were denied. 

As always, if you find an issue like this that seems abnormal, please don't hesitate to contact Support.  They'll pursue the issue to determine if there was an error or if the denial in question accurately reflects Bigstock's policies and standards.

Thank you!

Best,

Scott
Bigstock

219
Bigstock.com / Re: Scientific/Latin names in keywords
« on: December 02, 2010, 11:07 »
Hi guys,

I'm forwarding this to our team for clarification.  If this type of question or issue comes up, always feel free to reach out to Support.  Someone from our team will confirm what the policy is and I'll let you know what I hear back.

Best,

Scott  
Bigstock

220

***EDIT*** - Service should now be restored.   Thank you.


Hi folks,

Our apologies, but after some planned maintenance on Sunday, we now have some unplanned maintenance for FTP uploads.

We expect FTP uploads to be unavailable overnight and restored as early as possible before noon Eastern Time on Wednesday, Nov. 10th.  

Web-based uploads can still be accessed at:
http://www.bigstockphoto.com/account/uploads/add/

Thanks for your patience and understanding. We will notify users via a "Your Account" system alert when FTP uploading has been restored.


Best Regards,

Scott
Bigstock.com

221
Hello all,

FYI...

We are planning some scheduled system updates for Sunday, Nov. 7th, 2010. FTP uploading will not be available from 7pm - 9pm U.S. Eastern Time.

We thank you for your understanding and we apologize for any inconvenience.

Best Regards,

Scott
Bigstock

PS - This update is unrelated to any support issues, so if you've had any issues requiring technical support, please reach out to our customer service team directly at: http://www.bigstockphoto.com/contactus.html

Sell Your Images
Bigstock Contributor Blog

222
Bigstock.com / Re: the word Apple copyrighted?
« on: October 13, 2010, 06:47 »
The system language might not be updated yet (it will be), but that shouldn't prevent you from submitting the images.  I'll check with the team, but if you're having issues submitting the images, please make sure that you've entered all of the necessary metadata fields and categories. 

I'll double-check with the team in the meanwhile that these specific alerts don't prevent submission (although - to be clear - our alerts for insufficient metadata do prevent submission).

Best,

Scott

223
Bigstock.com / Re: What's happening with the uploads?
« on: October 12, 2010, 12:31 »
Hi guys,

I spoke to the team and there was an isolated issue processing some uploads via FTP which is now fixed.  This is an issue that affected specific uploads.  In these circumstances, it's very helpful (and necessary) to get these reports to the Support team, since it can be a case of a process that stalled during a narrow window of time or on a few specific accounts.  If the team knows exactly what accounts were affected, then it helps the investigation, since we can simply re-process those thumbnails (which is what the team did).

When these issues affect a few individual accounts, it takes some more investigating, because we can't "reproduce" the error by uploading images on our end and seeing what happens (since it will work fine when we try).  Often, users will come into the forums and assume that everyone has been affected, but that's typically not the case.

We apologize for the trouble. We do address issues pretty quickly when we know about them and it's clear what the issue is.  Carlos - I believe the Support team was on the line with you yesterday.  Let us know if you run into any further problems.

Best,

Scott
Bigstock
    

224
Bigstock.com / Re: What's happening with the uploads?
« on: October 10, 2010, 22:30 »
Hi guys,

I'll forward this to the Support and tech teams to get an update (it's a Sunday night, so the team might not be fully engaged until tomorrow), but the best path is to also follow up directly with Support for an answer, since they typically will attach a ticket to individual user accounts.

Best,

Scott
Bigstock 

225
Bigstock.com / Re: Locked out of account at bigstock
« on: October 05, 2010, 18:25 »
Dear all,

Like other businesses (with credit card companies being the obvious example), we have a number of security controls, alerts and procedures in place.  If we notice unusual activity on any account and we suspect that activity isn't legitimate, we'll pause the accounts to protect the parties involved and investigate the transactions.  Pausing an account doesn't mean that we suspect all of the users involved, it simply indicates that we want to stop the flow of transactions or downloads for review.  Mr. Barber's account will be active again soon. He is not suspected of any wrongdoing.

These tools and procedures exist to protect our contributors and create a safe environment for everyone.  Thanks for your understanding.   

Best Regards,

Scott
Bigstock

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors