101
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Prices. Again.
« on: October 24, 2012, 13:33 »
deleted - should have read closer...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 101
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Prices. Again.« on: October 24, 2012, 13:33 »
deleted - should have read closer...
102
General Stock Discussion / Re: Hilarious - Completely Useless Stock Images!!!!« on: October 12, 2012, 09:51 »
Here are some great niche idears
I think ficus tree concepts will be huge in 2013.. 103
New Sites - General / Re: RPD on iSignStock?« on: May 04, 2012, 18:26 »For 330$ pr year you can download 50 full resolution images pr week on iSignstock. Thats 2600 images for 330$ or 12.69 cent pr image which woukd leave the contributor with 3.8 cent after iSignstock has taken their 70% share...Well, we know that almost no buyers use the entire download quota, but this sure smells like a rotten deal for photographers. $0.50-$1.20 Is the RPD for the contributor? Why cant you report downloads to the contributor just like all other agencies does? Thanks to everybody for answering! 104
New Sites - General / Re: RPD on iSignStock?« on: May 04, 2012, 05:34 »For 330$ pr year you can download 50 full resolution images pr week on iSignstock. Thats 2600 images for 330$ or 12.69 cent pr image which woukd leave the contributor with 3.8 cent after iSignstock has taken their 70% share...Well, we know that almost no buyers use the entire download quota, but this sure smells like a rotten deal for photographers. Just to be clear, this means that they don't give information about how many and which of your photos have downloaded?? Only a dollar amount at the end of the month? 105
New Sites - General / RPD on iSignStock?« on: May 03, 2012, 00:44 »
For 330$ pr year you can download 50 full resolution images pr week on iSignstock. Thats 2600 images for 330$ or 12.69 cent pr image which woukd leave the contributor with 3.8 cent after iSignstock has taken their 70% share...Well, we know that almost no buyers use the entire download quota, but this sure smells like a rotten deal for photographers.
Anyone care to share their RPD on iSignStock? 106
Newbie Discussion / Re: Hey - Introduction from David from Payoneer« on: April 04, 2012, 08:08 »
Allow me to reiterate: There are no hidden fees by your definition. There are however hidden fees by my definition. 107
DepositPhotos / Re: MacVoices Interview with Depositphotos Elena on Photoshopworld« on: April 04, 2012, 07:59 »March - 66 sales (0.37$ each) Not a lot of data, but yes: lowest RPD in top 10....sad 108
Newbie Discussion / Re: Hey - Introduction from David from Payoneer« on: April 04, 2012, 07:55 »Please tell that we are getting all this wrong... Its not at all clear that the 3% you charge is on top of Mastercards currency exchange rate. Its pretty darn well hidden...As pointed out all the consumer care about is the actual cut there is taken, not who it goes to. Where is this information listed? You are ofcause on the right side of the law, but its very unethical. 109
DepositPhotos / Re: MacVoices Interview with Depositphotos Elena on Photoshopworld« on: April 04, 2012, 07:38 »[/quote] they mainly have subscription plan buyers but apart from that they do pay decent royalties 44% as the lowest [/quote] Exactly, they are a subscription site undercutting already low subscribtion prices, so who cares about 44% of a small amount you rarely get anyway.. Their success increases the risk of other subscription sites lowering their prices and commisions. 110
DepositPhotos / Re: MacVoices Interview with Depositphotos Elena on Photoshopworld« on: April 04, 2012, 07:34 »...and not one critical question to the site currently leading the race to the bottom. I agree. But I think the blame should be shared with 81-85% of blame going to the sites and 15-19% of the blame going to contributors... 111
DepositPhotos / Re: MacVoices Interview with Depositphotos Elena on Photoshopworld« on: April 04, 2012, 07:14 »
...and not one critical question to the site currently leading the race to the bottom.
112
Newbie Discussion / Re: Hey - Introduction from David from Payoneer« on: April 03, 2012, 21:58 »Hello 4FR Yes, its quite horrible to be honest - especially how hidden this information is. Sorry Payoneer, but you are only a solution for US microstock contributors or people that have not done their research - unfortunately you hide this information so well that im sure most people will never know they are paying 5-6% over the market exchange rate. Paying 5-6 dollars for every 100 dollars spend is just mind-blowingly insane. Please tell that we are getting all this wrong... If not there is only one conclusion: 1) Payoneer is NOT a solution if you plan to use your card outside the US 113
Newbie Discussion / Re: Hey« on: April 01, 2012, 07:30 »
Why is the spread soo high (2-3% or more?) on transactions not done in USD and why is it so hard to get specific knowledge about your spreads?
Can you inform us what the spread is for transactions done in Euro, RUB, AUD, Yen, CAD, GBP? And maybe for some other major currencies? This is very relevant for anyone considering to use Payoneer outside the US. Most microstockers are from outside the US, whereas most payments (if not all payments?) from microstock sites to payoneer cards are in USD... 114
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Another Massive Best Match Shift« on: December 22, 2011, 12:40 »
If this change is here to stay, It will no longer be worth uploading to iS for many independents.
115
Dreamstime.com / Re: Account disabled at Dreamstime.« on: August 06, 2011, 21:51 »
That is wrong and it only makes it worse that you are full timers. You have not have any prior warnings or disputes with DT? Under all circumstances, I really dont see that DT have any thing to gain from not contacting you first. On the contrary, it just makes them look really bad in the eyes of contributors. Why would a company be mean when they have nothing to gain? That just seems like bad business to me, but maybe I am missing something?
116
Dreamstime.com / Re: subs taking control of DT ??« on: August 05, 2011, 02:15 »
With their new weekly subscribtions there will only be more and more subs on DT as buyers old credits run out - smart move from DT to intransparent cut contributers commision and keep a larger cut to them selves...
117
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's 'Keyword Trends'« on: July 17, 2011, 12:45 »
Its pretty much useless in its current form. A Y-axis without any scale means that you can only see if the trend is upward or downward, but you can't see how much its up or down. What may visible look like a huge increase for one keyword could only be a 0,1% increase, whereas what looks like a small increase for another keyword may be 200% increase - there is just no way of knowing... ANY abitrary scale would make this tool very useful.
118
Microstock Analytics / Re: Microstock Analytics - track files sales and ROI on photoshoots« on: May 25, 2011, 12:07 »
I just want to join the choir: its almost ten times more expensive that what I'm willing to pay, and subscription does not make much sense...
119
Featurepics.com / Re: 1 year lock time.« on: May 24, 2011, 04:11 »
Things are changing too fast to justify locking in my files for 1 year at such a very low earner. I'm done with FeaturePics...
120
Microstock Analytics / Re: Microstock Analytics - track files sales and ROI on photoshoots« on: May 23, 2011, 12:53 »I don't have any access to stats. They all stored on local harddrive only. great! 121
Microstock Analytics / Re: Microstock Analytics - track files sales and ROI on photoshoots« on: May 23, 2011, 10:22 »
Are the stats 100% private? Or do you plan of selling aggregate data like LookStat?
122
123RF / Re: Opting out of API Partner Sales« on: May 15, 2011, 17:59 »Is this 50% of the sales price or 50% of whatever percentage you receive from the partner? That does make a difference... And: Why you sign a NDA that does not allow you to tell the copyright holder of an image through which partner you sell his work is beyond me. Sorry, but if you can't tell me where you're selling my images then I choose to opt out. Just a practical question: If I see some of my pictures somewhere on the internet, am I supposed to assume it is a legit partner of somebody? Or shall I start writing to them, demanding my work taken down, threatening with legal action? (Yes, I know, there are others who don't tell us and don't let us opt out - but they should not be used as guiding principle...) [/quote] It truly is mindblowing....Ofcuase the only sensible thing to do is to opt out of such programs 124
123RF / Re: Opting out of API Partner Sales« on: May 10, 2011, 11:44 »
Hi 123rf
I would still really like to know the commision in % we recieve on these partner sites? And Why can we not be told about the sites you intend to sell our images on? 125
General Stock Discussion / Re: Site stealing your images« on: May 10, 2011, 11:36 »
I found some of my images free to download on http://www.freeimageworks.com via Google images. Some of my images they even charge for. I wrote them to take them down, before I saw this thread - so far no response. Is there any point in reporting them to paypal for running a fraudulant business? What other other things can be done? This is much more critical than finding images in torrents. They charge for stolen property and misleads the buyer to believe he is not doing anything illigal.
|
|