MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - somethingpretentious

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
101
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Prices. Again.
« on: October 24, 2012, 13:33 »
deleted - should have read closer...

102
Here are some great niche idears

Patrick Wilson's Stock Photos


I think ficus tree concepts will be huge in 2013..


103
New Sites - General / Re: RPD on iSignStock?
« on: May 04, 2012, 18:26 »
For 330$ pr year you can download 50 full resolution images pr week on iSignstock. Thats 2600 images for 330$ or 12.69 cent pr image which woukd leave the contributor with 3.8 cent after iSignstock has taken their 70% share...Well, we know that almost no buyers use the entire download quota, but this sure smells like a rotten deal for photographers.

Anyone care to share their RPD on iSignStock?

As you mention calculating the RPD based on the maximum download limits is a very misleading approach as literally none of our customers use their full quota. This service is marketed to sign makers. It is an important market for images but their requirement is less than say graphic designers. The vast majority purchase full subscriptions ($395) but use a fraction of their download limit. Currently the average revenue per download ranges from $0.50-$1.20 and don't forget this figure will include images they download for mock ups and samples which will never be used commercially. We have many contributors making good royalties with us and in last months polls we were just below Panther Media and Photodune.


$0.50-$1.20 Is the RPD for the contributor?
Why cant you report downloads to the contributor just like all other agencies does?

Thanks to everybody for answering!

104
New Sites - General / Re: RPD on iSignStock?
« on: May 04, 2012, 05:34 »
For 330$ pr year you can download 50 full resolution images pr week on iSignstock. Thats 2600 images for 330$ or 12.69 cent pr image which woukd leave the contributor with 3.8 cent after iSignstock has taken their 70% share...Well, we know that almost no buyers use the entire download quota, but this sure smells like a rotten deal for photographers.

Anyone care to share their RPD on iSignStock?

they dont give us that information, only totals

Just to be clear, this means that they don't give information about how many and which of your photos have downloaded?? Only a dollar amount at the end of the month?

105
New Sites - General / RPD on iSignStock?
« on: May 03, 2012, 00:44 »
For 330$ pr year you can download 50 full resolution images pr week on iSignstock. Thats 2600 images for 330$ or 12.69 cent pr image which woukd leave the contributor with 3.8 cent after iSignstock has taken their 70% share...Well, we know that almost no buyers use the entire download quota, but this sure smells like a rotten deal for photographers.

Anyone care to share their RPD on iSignStock?

106

Hey,

Allow me to reiterate, there are no hidden fees. On the pricing and fee page it is listed during the card application process and afterwards can be viewed anytime by logging into "My Account" and viewing it there.

Allow me to reiterate: There are no hidden fees by your definition. There are however hidden fees by my definition.

107
March - 66 sales (0.37$ each)
a) subs - 15.54$
b) credits - 9.15$

Not a lot of data, but yes: lowest RPD in top 10....sad :(

108


Please tell that we are getting all this wrong...


Payoneer does not have any hidden fees. Our entire list of pricing and fees is fully explained and available at any time. If you have any specific questions I am happy to answer them.

Let me be clear, you are not being charged 6% for currency conversion. The issue here seems to be with MasterCard's official rates which are used by millions of people in over 210 countries worldwide.

MasterCard's rates are used for all debit/credit MasterCard cards worldwide. When compared to other leading international on-line payment solutions, you will see that these rates are highly competitive and are considered to be among the best rates available on the market.

   

Its not at all clear that the 3% you charge is on top of Mastercards currency exchange rate. Its pretty darn well hidden...As pointed out all the consumer care about is the actual cut there is taken, not who it goes to. Where is this information listed? You are ofcause on the right side of the law, but its very unethical.

109

[/quote]

they mainly have subscription plan buyers but apart from that they do pay decent royalties 44% as the lowest
[/quote]

Exactly, they are a subscription site undercutting already low subscribtion prices, so who cares about 44% of a small amount you rarely get anyway..
Their success increases the risk of other subscription sites lowering their prices and commisions.

110
...and not one critical question to the site currently leading the race to the bottom.

Well, if the site didn't have contributors, it couldn't lead the race to the bottom. So the blame should be shared equally between the greedy site and contributors who are willing to work for nothing. That's what happens when the economy tanks. Those with money take advantage of those who are desperate for money.  :(

I agree. But I think the blame should be shared with 81-85% of blame going to the sites and 15-19% of the blame going to contributors...

111
...and not one critical question to the site currently leading the race to the bottom.

112
Hello 4FR

I looked into the matter for you:

The transaction was converted using MasterCard's official rates, and a conversion charge no greater than that mentioned above,. A customer support supervisor contacted you with more detailed information regarding the transaction.
 
Additionally, we use MasterCards official rates, which can be estimated at: https://www.mastercard.com/global/currencyconversion/index.html.

I hope this helps resolve the confusion and am happy to help if there are further questions.

Thanks David, Dan contacted.

Exactly what I expected the Mastercard rate for my 20000 THB withdrawal is almost 3% (!!!) higher than the market rate for that date and you guys added another 2,3% + ATM charge + Foreign Currency Charge to it which leads to an effective 6% and higher !!!

For us costumers the FINAL % is of matter and as long as you guys work with a mastercard conversion rate which is FAR off any acceptable value, we feel ripped-off by your currency conversions!

No way Payoneer can be competitive with those rates once customers are aware of this "hidden" cost.

Yes, its quite horrible to be honest - especially how hidden this information is. Sorry Payoneer, but you are only a solution for US microstock contributors or people that have not done their research - unfortunately you hide this information so well that im sure most people will never know they are paying 5-6% over the market exchange rate. Paying 5-6 dollars for every 100 dollars spend is just mind-blowingly insane.

Please tell that we are getting all this wrong...

If not there is only one conclusion:

1) Payoneer is NOT a solution if you plan to use your card outside the US

113
Newbie Discussion / Re: Hey
« on: April 01, 2012, 07:30 »
Why is the spread soo high (2-3% or more?) on transactions not done in USD and why is it so hard to get specific knowledge about your spreads?

Can you inform us what the spread is for transactions done in Euro, RUB, AUD, Yen, CAD, GBP? And maybe for some other major currencies?

This is very relevant for anyone considering to use Payoneer outside the US. Most microstockers are from outside the US, whereas most payments (if not all payments?) from microstock sites to payoneer cards are in USD...

114
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Another Massive Best Match Shift
« on: December 22, 2011, 12:40 »
If this change is here to stay, It will no longer be worth uploading to iS for many independents.

115
Dreamstime.com / Re: Account disabled at Dreamstime.
« on: August 06, 2011, 21:51 »
That is wrong and it only makes it worse that you are full timers. You have not have any prior warnings or disputes with DT? Under all circumstances, I really dont see that DT have any thing to gain from not contacting you first. On the contrary, it just makes them look really bad in the eyes of contributors. Why would a company be mean when they have nothing to gain? That just seems like bad business to me, but maybe I am missing something?

116
Dreamstime.com / Re: subs taking control of DT ??
« on: August 05, 2011, 02:15 »
With their new weekly subscribtions there will only be more and more subs on DT as buyers old credits run out  - smart move from DT to intransparent cut contributers commision and keep a larger cut to them selves...

117
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock's 'Keyword Trends'
« on: July 17, 2011, 12:45 »
Its pretty much useless in its current form. A Y-axis without any scale means that you can only see if the trend is upward or downward, but you can't see how much its up or down. What may visible look like a huge increase for one keyword could only be a 0,1% increase, whereas what looks like a small increase for another keyword may be 200% increase - there is just no way of knowing... ANY abitrary scale would make this tool very useful.

118
I just want to join the choir: its almost ten times more expensive that what I'm willing to pay, and subscription does not make much sense...

119
Featurepics.com / Re: 1 year lock time.
« on: May 24, 2011, 04:11 »
Things are changing too fast to justify locking in my files for 1 year at such a very low earner.  I'm done with FeaturePics...

120
I don't have any access to stats. They all stored on local harddrive only.

great!

121
Are the stats 100% private? Or do you plan of selling aggregate data like LookStat?

122
123RF / Re: Opting out of API Partner Sales
« on: May 15, 2011, 17:59 »


Is this 50% of the sales price or 50% of whatever percentage you receive from the partner? That does make a difference...

And: Why you sign a NDA that does not allow you to tell the copyright holder of an image through which partner you sell his work is beyond me. Sorry, but if you can't tell me where you're selling my images then I choose to opt out.
Just a practical question: If I see some of my pictures somewhere on the internet, am I supposed to assume it is a legit partner of somebody? Or shall I start writing to them, demanding my work taken down, threatening with legal action?

(Yes, I know, there are others who don't tell us and don't let us opt out - but they should not be used as guiding principle...)
[/quote]

It truly is mindblowing....Ofcuase the only sensible thing to do is to opt out of such programs

123
123RF / Re: Opting out of API Partner Sales
« on: May 11, 2011, 18:16 »
Thanks Anglee!

124
123RF / Re: Opting out of API Partner Sales
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:44 »
Hi 123rf

I would still really like to know the commision in % we recieve on these partner sites?

And

Why can we not be told about the sites you intend to sell our images on?

125
General Stock Discussion / Re: Site stealing your images
« on: May 10, 2011, 11:36 »
I found some of my images free to download on http://www.freeimageworks.com via Google images. Some of my images they even charge for. I wrote them to take them down, before I saw this thread - so far no response. Is there any point in reporting them to paypal for running a fraudulant business? What other other things can be done? This is much more critical than finding images in torrents. They charge for stolen property and misleads the buyer to believe he is not doing anything illigal.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors