26
General Stock Discussion / Re: What would you do if shutterstock decreased all subs to the first tier (0.25$)?
« on: March 02, 2014, 12:33 »
I would draw more to keep up! Wouldn't you?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 26
General Stock Discussion / Re: What would you do if shutterstock decreased all subs to the first tier (0.25$)?« on: March 02, 2014, 12:33 »
I would draw more to keep up! Wouldn't you?
27
Panthermedia.net / Re: What about Panthermedia?« on: February 26, 2014, 07:10 »
Be ready everybody, pm is gonna hire big time, money spender, eccentric millionaire .....customers.
28
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Uploading issues« on: January 17, 2014, 12:13 »I was finally able to upload using Deep Meta yesterday. I upload videos via FTP which seemed to work, however when I went to edit and submit them it took 3 tries each video...meaning I had to redo all the metadata each try. Was a pain.same here, but with vectors, it seems upload is stuck for a while... 29
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Uploading issues« on: January 17, 2014, 10:20 »
Upload is broken for vectors too...
30
Panthermedia.net / Re: Upload« on: December 14, 2013, 21:11 »
Thank you DC, good to know it's not me.
31
Panthermedia.net / Upload« on: December 14, 2013, 20:54 »
Does anybody has problems uploading to panthermedia lately? My last two batches were not processed. I would normally ask them but ... it takes a while until you get an answer.
Thank you. 32
Symbiostock - General / Re: What's holding you back from joining Symbiostock?« on: November 25, 2013, 10:00 »
I have a simple question for symbiostockers (if I can call you like that): Is it worthed to invest time and money?
33
Dreamstime.com / Re: dreamstime.com site - is it down ?« on: November 15, 2013, 02:58 »
Don't think it's a internet issue pixsol, not working here either.
34
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Changes to Main Collection pricing« on: June 28, 2013, 00:28 »
I guess the next step will be subscriptions.
35
Dreamstime.com / Re: An Interesting Commentary by CEPIC to Dreamstime About Giving Images Away« on: June 03, 2013, 05:30 »I like the fancy idea of us all giving away our images for free.You first:) 36
Shutterstock.com / Re: OFFSET opened doors« on: May 30, 2013, 11:47 »Just signed up for a buyers account. I have to say first glance, nothing special. Images that we all could have created. Search for London or kids and see what I mean.I guess it's all about accomplished artists and curated collections just like thay said. 37
DepositPhotos / Re: Returned Sales !!« on: March 27, 2013, 05:01 »
Too many in my opinion. DP should protect itself and us too from this. I can understand one or two but up to 50 from most contributors sounds a bit like a well planned fraud and I dont see why we have to pay for it. We pay enough taxes and cuts and comissions and all that other bs.
38
General Stock Discussion / Re: Using a stock vector as a logo?« on: March 13, 2013, 16:10 »
Instead of wasting time writing 1000 e-mails and read another 1000 agreements u should ask them for free meals daily for using that image as a logo.
39
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac merges with Pond5« on: March 12, 2013, 10:12 »This is kind of off topic but I want to mention it since admins are looking at this thread.+1 40
Off Topic / La multi ani!« on: March 08, 2013, 08:25 »
Today we celebrate in Romania Woman's Day. My best wishes and happy thoughts to all women and girls here! May you be loved and cherished as the most beautiful and important creatures that you are.
P.S. Please stop being better than we are at stockphotography and illustration 41
Shutterstock.com / Re: Outlines of states are rejected?« on: March 06, 2013, 15:17 »
It could be because there are oh so many already online, best sellers but lots. There is also mail support wich is very helpful over there. You can ask for a detailed rejection reason, it will only help you.gl
42
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Banned from Istock club« on: March 05, 2013, 09:31 »
I am sorry ShadySue, I meant no offense, just being objective. The point of having a forum is to discuss whatever the creator of the forum wants to discuss. It is the forum of Istock. Their house their rules. I dont see Istock or any other agency as a democracy but as a business. If it's a good or a bad business that is another issue but the fact is that they dont want any bad publicity on their forum.
43
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Banned from Istock club« on: March 05, 2013, 07:50 »
In my opinion it is their site, their forum, their rules. Play along or get banned. I would do the same if anyone would talk bad about me on my page or blog, whatever, especially if it was a public/customers involved one. I never read the forum rules but I am sure that there are some about not posting this or that.
44
General Stock Discussion / Re: Dreamstime refusals not logical« on: January 25, 2013, 14:38 »+1DT has the worst reviewers along with VR and GL.. 45
Shutterstock.com / Re: Former Exclusives Interested in Joining Shutterstock« on: January 19, 2013, 08:43 »If they don't have to go through the entry submission, you should at least put a symbol on their profile pages of a little crown falling off a head.haha:) 46
Off Topic / Re: Merry Christmas!« on: December 23, 2012, 07:18 »
My bad! Was not looking for attention, just missed that topic.
47
Off Topic / Merry Christmas!« on: December 23, 2012, 07:11 »
Happy holidays everybody and lots of sales next year!
Rich 48
StockFresh / Re: Anyone else seeing StockFresh sales improve?« on: December 03, 2012, 17:47 »
More likely to be just a SadFresh!
49
General Stock Discussion / Chat slang anyone?« on: October 28, 2012, 04:00 »
I wonder if any agency accept as keywords messenger abbreviations like :brb, u2, AKA, IMO, LOL and so on... and if is a factor into improving search/sales?
50
Shutterstock.com / Re: Downright steal of copyrights on large scale prints...!« on: October 07, 2012, 10:22 »
I dont see it! Where?
|
|