pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TheDman

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
76
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Images DOA on Istock?
« on: July 25, 2010, 09:41 »
This week's most popular are all older files, with the exception of the top one, which was uploaded 2/25/10, right around the cutoff line. I'm not sure when in February something happened, but it really seems to be about then.

77
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Images DOA on Istock?
« on: July 24, 2010, 18:32 »

Some quick analysis makes me question if simple market oversaturation is the issue. If that were the case, then old files would suffer as new files cannibalize their sales resulting in a general spreading out of the wealth between new and old files, but this isn't happening. Old files seem to be clipping along as they always have, while new stuff just isn't getting so much as a sniff.

The dilution effect is caused by heavy uploads such as 50,000 files added in one week or so.

That was happening long before this February though, so I still can't figure out what changed then that is causing this. My top seller right now from 10-09 got almost no sales in it's first month, then gathered steam, so I don't think it's a case of new files needing to take off instantly or they get lost. I just don't see any new files taking off at all.

78
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Images DOA on Istock?
« on: July 24, 2010, 14:46 »
Hey all,

I know this is old thread alert, but I've been noticing this trend for several months. In fact, I found this particular thread by googling "istockphoto new files don't sell", just to see if anyone else was talking about it. Sure enough. Not only do my meager, once-in-a-while uploads no longer sell, but I've been observing portfolios of several top contributors who usually produce consistent sellers, and the trend is the same with all of them: files uploaded after about Feb 2010 are DOA.

Some quick analysis makes me question if simple market oversaturation is the issue. If that were the case, then old files would suffer as new files cannibalize their sales resulting in a general spreading out of the wealth between new and old files, but this isn't happening. Old files seem to be clipping along as they always have, while new stuff just isn't getting so much as a sniff. I was just browsing a portfolio of a high-volume contributor. He has several flames on files he uploaded as recently as this January, however the biggest seller among files he uploaded after February has a mere 20 downloads, with most having 0- 5 sales. I can't imagine the market got that much more oversaturated between January and February.

Conversely, it's hard to blame search positioning for the problem either. A few of my new files rank very well in the best match, and are getting views but still no sales. It used to be unheard of if one of my files got over 100 views with no sales. Now the norm for my new files is 200-400 views and no sales.

Why views aren't translating into sales is mystifying, as is the February 'extinction event'. My hottest seller right now is a file that I uploaded last October, and if anything it is still picking up steam. I suspect that had I uploaded that same image in March of this year, it would have less than 5 sales.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors