MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Karen
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12
251
« on: October 31, 2013, 07:47 »
You are now blaming other sites for causing people to drop RC levels on IS. LOL. IS is never ever at fault, are they? Do you actually believe your own BS?
I was talking about declining sales. I don't like the RC system at all although I'll be comfortably staying at the same level.
IStock's loss of sales is iStock's fault, not other people's. Consider these points: After setting up TS, Getty decided to advertise it on the iStock homepage as a cheaper option The iStock website is horribly slow even when it's working, costing customers valuable time iStock prices were pushed up too far on a significant part of the content, encouraging budget buyers to look elsewhere for content (I think they even made some comment once about wanting corporate budgets, not low-volume buyers). iStock pricing is extremely confusing and files can change price dramatically at any time, depending on the latest whim iStock chose to tick-off its suppliers by squeezing them in innumerable ways, ensuring that it got a heap of bad publicity (and probably alerting a lot of customers to cheaper alternatives in the process) Getty decided to swamp iS with mountains of third-rate material from old collections it had lying about, hoping to rake in a big return, but actually devaluing the collection Getty decided to slash iStock's profitablity by cutting the cost of half its files by about 60%, thereby pulling some sales off the higher-priced material without - by all accounts - pulling in any extra customers. Getty/iS decided to wipe out the community spirit that had allowed it to sail on with exclusives and a number of buyers alike viewing the collection through rose-tinted glasses.
Now, how much of that is really Shutterstock's fault?
If so many contributors will go down why nobody is asking to lower the RC targets? I can't see any discussion of this issue on iStock's forums.
252
« on: October 30, 2013, 08:53 »
It's 2 months till the end of the year 2013... With the last fall in sales on iStockphoto it looks like I will go down by 5% to lower RC level. Are you going up/down or stay at the same RC level? Thoughts?
253
« on: October 28, 2013, 05:23 »
Merchant account fee is what they cut from the agency's payment to our Skrill account, right?
Right, I have stopped using Skrill/Moneybookers.
254
« on: October 21, 2013, 07:14 »
https://www.skrill.com/en/business/merchant-fees/ It's 2.95 euros per withdrawal to back account, right?
In my case - to withdraw amount of 100 euros: merchant account fee 4% - 4 euroswithdrawal fee 2.95 euros per withdrawal - 2.95 eurosintermediary bank charge - 20 eurostotal fees and commisions: 26.95 eurosnet amount to my bank account: 73.05 euros
255
« on: October 20, 2013, 14:36 »
More then 90% are using PayPal as a payment service provider!
256
« on: October 20, 2013, 14:31 »
I sent them an invitation to come to this forum. Hope they will come. Please send them messages - invitations too.
Thanks skyfish! I also hope they will come here with an official explanation.
257
« on: October 17, 2013, 13:17 »
Used Skrill recently but being transfered to a merchant account it became much more expensive than the ones I use now.
That's exactly what happened to me
258
« on: October 17, 2013, 13:03 »
Skrill has become extremely expensive: merchant account fee, withdrawal transaction fee, monthly inactivity fee etc.
What are the alternatives? What payment service provider are you using?
259
« on: October 17, 2013, 12:54 »
9.2 [] the Merchant will be charged a monthly inactivity fee of 19.95 EUR (or equivalent), if no funds have been uploaded, withdrawn, sent or received through the Merchant Account(s) within the last six (6) months. This shall however not apply to the extent that the Merchant is subject to the gateway usage fee as set-out on the merchant fees page.
monthly inactivity fee 19.95 EUR + merchant account fee 4% + withdrawal transaction fee 20 EUR? What is happening with Skrill?
260
« on: October 17, 2013, 06:33 »
Reply from Skrill: You may always consider using an alternative withdrawal option such as Visa withdrawal or withdrawal to a bank account of yours located in a different country... ... or maybe consider using an alternative payment service provider, PayPal?
261
« on: October 17, 2013, 06:25 »
Dont believe what Skrill says, according to Alamy skrill is free. LOL
Skrill officials have yet to come up here with an official explanation of all these unexpected fees and commissions.
262
« on: October 15, 2013, 13:41 »
I am in Europe.
263
« on: October 15, 2013, 12:30 »
I'm using same bank and Skrill for 5 years and never ever international bank wire transfer was subject to intermediary bank charges. Now it's the case. 10 euros per transaction. Why? Because they change the intermediary bank. So beware when using wire transfer via Skrill!
I noticed that too. Though in my case it was 20 euros per transaction! :-( I will stop using wire transfer via Skrill.
264
« on: January 21, 2013, 14:46 »
Congrats!!! Are you going to deactivate your port there?
265
« on: January 21, 2013, 14:44 »
All the good guys left Getty. Just wondering why kelvinjay is still a Forum Moderator on Istockphoto?
266
« on: January 21, 2013, 14:36 »
Why not just stop uploading immediately / now and deactivate everything on February 2nd?
267
« on: January 21, 2013, 14:32 »
268
« on: December 06, 2011, 13:12 »
Looks like the situation is not so bad as the majority will keep the current level or even go up inspite of decline in sales reported in monthly threads... Anyway hope they will reduce the targets according to the sales volume
269
« on: November 30, 2011, 04:04 »
I'm thinking if I may reach that year's redeemed credit goal How about you Thanks for taking part.
270
« on: November 23, 2011, 12:58 »
Bruce negotiated the famous "quit your day job" offer that brought House contracts to high ranking istock exclusives. I am one of the many grateful contributors who got one. The offer was independent of style of portfolio, you just had to be at the right level to get in.
What is the difference between "regular" and "house contract" exclusive? Does it make any difference now with RC system?
271
« on: November 20, 2011, 15:34 »
272
« on: November 20, 2011, 09:08 »
273
« on: May 01, 2011, 08:23 »
Not a good month for me, especially not at Istock, where I was down 80 per cent compared to last April... Look at the Istock April statistics thread: http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=328242&page=3For the first time in years so many contributors reports on -30% drop Is somebody in HQ going to take responsibility for all these best match tweaks?
274
« on: April 08, 2011, 14:38 »
I hope that it is just a 1 week best match experiment and it gets fixed next week.
Is anybody at HQ going to take responsibility for all these "experiments"?
275
« on: April 04, 2011, 06:34 »
Looks like someone "restarted" best match and it probably needs some activity to get going. At least, I hope this is whats happening. I just dont understand why they dont let contributors now "Hey guys, we are pushing some software buttons this week-end". Just so that we know what is going on. For many here istock is a considerable income and with all the issues people are jittery enough already. A little understanding can go a long way.
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=320732&page=1"Generally we're getting more and more satisfied with the overall sort... ...Again, we've been happy so far with the trends we're seeing since this went live. We saw room for improvement and have been working there and getting happier..."
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|