|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Karen
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12]
276
« on: April 04, 2011, 01:09 »
Just remember what they told us - "Money is not what will make you happy"
277
« on: March 19, 2011, 14:56 »
Since I'm in Bangkok now I just did a search for "bangkok" with the slider all the way to the right (most relevant isn't it supposed to be) and the second image has "bangkok" listed as the 10th most relevant keyword. This can't be correct, I know we were told there are no bugs but the most relevant images should be better than that shouldn't they?
I think they switched the slider (or may be it has been broken) - just try to set the slider all the way left and you will get the most relevant results. 
278
« on: March 17, 2011, 10:06 »
279
« on: March 16, 2011, 05:53 »
I hope that doesn't mean I'm going to see them selling off my work on the stock sites one day (but they probably could if they wanted to)
You mean re-selling again your work as Istockphoto "exclusive" + Agency content  Interesting if you (the original illustrator, not Dorling Kindersley publishers) are going to get anything out of these sales 
282
« on: January 13, 2011, 01:57 »
283
« on: January 13, 2011, 01:54 »
284
« on: December 29, 2010, 06:11 »
If iStock is going to adjust contributors' royalties, even though the credit card companies are on the hook for the charges, then where will that money go??? Into iStock's bank account, right?
right  , may be you should change the subject to "where will that money go???"
285
« on: October 22, 2010, 10:10 »
They really probably should have called it "Money isnt going to be what makes you all happy!"They really probably should have called it "The Clubbys".
286
« on: October 07, 2010, 09:47 »
289
« on: September 08, 2010, 07:50 »
If there is diamond contributor, currently taking 40% and if you sold 39,999 credits worth of images in 2010. That means for your sales in 2011, your rate would drop from 40% to 30%. That is a 25% pay decrease from what you were earning! not to be confused with a 10 percent rate decrease! Is there any reason why to reduce 25% pay for this contributor???
290
« on: September 08, 2010, 07:15 »
Just wait for a few days for their old and verified tactics. They will offer something that is just slightly less awful than this and people will start saying "Thanks istock".
so true 
291
« on: August 29, 2010, 14:10 »
As I said, this can't be technology that is blocking these two things from being fixed. There must be more to it.
I also highly doubt this is just ignorance. It seems that they don't want to fix it and they have a reason for not doing it. What reason?
I aslo feel ashamed by the approach that IS staff takes to these two topics in the forums.
They play games with contributors
a) pretending that everything is just fine with the PP earning being reported this late and
b) bashing anyone that complains about the PP opt-in problem telling them that that is not the topic of the thread. Unethical. In may early days of microstocking I got the impression that IS is the best place with the best staff. It is sad it turned this way.
Agree, unfortunately... 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12]
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
