|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Pauws99
4451
« on: July 02, 2014, 06:36 »
Acceptance rate has gone through the floor lately - and seem to accept what everyone else rejects. On the other hand easy to upload and sales OK - but no more than that but patchy.
4452
« on: June 28, 2014, 08:24 »
"Because of that they give me the highest RPD after Alamy." Which illustrates why that is such a meaningless stat. Probably my worst underperforming site compared with my expectations
4453
« on: June 21, 2014, 15:15 »
Yep usually get two per submission record is four not bothered 
4454
« on: June 19, 2014, 16:13 »
World Cup effect maybe?
4455
« on: June 11, 2014, 16:01 »
Well thought through Mike - it amazes me how the smaller sites hang around so long.
I'm not sure about "premium quality" as I'm not surely its definable.
4456
« on: June 11, 2014, 13:11 »
MSG posters predicting the imminent demise of the industry and saying its a waste of time while still uploading pictures.
Shutterstock still dominant I-stock clinging on. RPI declining nano stock level pricing for Facebook and as yet unknown opportunities.
Something totally unexpected!
4457
« on: June 10, 2014, 05:01 »
Judging by my sales Panther already has a small circle of buyers!
4458
« on: June 04, 2014, 13:48 »
Yep things swinging into action DeepMeta down due to problems at I Stock - Look out Crestock I stock are chasing your market share! 
4459
« on: June 03, 2014, 13:49 »
A triumph of hope over experience? Don't think so
4460
« on: June 01, 2014, 04:59 »
Pretty good for me but I'm an overall poor performer by SS standards
4461
« on: May 27, 2014, 12:39 »
I've used Vista Print and found them good quality price depends on the various offers at the time
4462
« on: May 16, 2014, 16:20 »
Had one sale for .77 Credits well ".777778333333" to be Precise 
4463
« on: May 09, 2014, 02:59 »
The pie is bigger but cut into smaller slices
4464
« on: May 01, 2014, 10:29 »
Tror,
Alamy actually regard their contributors as professionals capable of assessing their own images and therefore only assess a sample and punishing them if contributors don't do their QC properly but delaying the rejection. Different but certainly not unprofessional.
4465
« on: April 28, 2014, 05:50 »
The daily limit confuses me and I seem to lose files if I upload too many no sales for ages - on backburner
4466
« on: April 12, 2014, 02:25 »
Very few sales for me increasing slowly but a pleasant diversion from stock
4467
« on: April 04, 2014, 05:35 »
Many of us were weaned on Praktica cameras built like tanks!
4468
« on: April 03, 2014, 05:00 »
I would suggest giving it another year and see where you are then don't give up the day job just yet!
I think 1$ per image per month is very high - look at your own stats and estimate from there. To replace your income of $600 you would need about 6000 images BUT there is a risk on income going down (or up) also you need to take into account any production costs
4469
« on: April 03, 2014, 03:28 »
Apart from Istock i've found everyone accepts the Dreamstime one
4470
« on: April 02, 2014, 15:51 »
$1,700 for "decent stills" h'mmmmm
4471
« on: April 02, 2014, 14:49 »
Microstock is not art it is about commercial images
4472
« on: March 24, 2014, 08:11 »
This thread says more about its contributors than shutterstock
4473
« on: March 19, 2014, 17:51 »
tickstock posts a lot I disagree with but has a point of view different to mine that doesn't make him a troll. Personally I see little point in always reading posts I agree with - thats how you stop thinking.
4474
« on: March 18, 2014, 13:29 »
Nice to know some people are doing it properly!
4475
« on: March 17, 2014, 07:45 »
Slow for me but a bit better than Yay - I don't know what other sites you are on but there a plenty better
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
