1
Off Topic / Re: Image of the whole sky
« on: January 15, 2011, 08:44 »
Thanks, I love this kind of stuff. NASA Goddard Photo and Video is my favorite stream on flickr too.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
Off Topic / Re: Image of the whole sky« on: January 15, 2011, 08:44 »
Thanks, I love this kind of stuff. NASA Goddard Photo and Video is my favorite stream on flickr too.
2
Shutterstock.com / Re: How Much do you get per Subscription Download on SS as of Jan. 1st 2011?« on: January 15, 2011, 08:40 »... and looky-look what it got you with istock and microstock in general so what's the several hundred pages of pissed of whining on istock and here is all about then? it's suddenly "woo-yay again"? my god you people are inconsistent infantile kids... 3
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Kelly announces slightly downsized RC targets« on: January 15, 2011, 08:35 »do you people ever do this thing called THINKING? it helps you make connections between certain phenomenona. of course you don't have sales on a place like alamy, when you got millions of files on sale for a couple fo bucks. jezuz... : ( what an infantile response... who talked about rolling in money? : ) 4
Shutterstock.com / Re: How Much do you get per Subscription Download on SS as of Jan. 1st 2011?« on: January 14, 2011, 18:24 »
Looks like truth hurts again. But you people sure are good at ignoring things! Great skill, it's called ignorance... and looky-look what it got you with istock and microstock in general
5
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Kelly announces slightly downsized RC targets« on: January 14, 2011, 18:15 »ok, how 'bout everyone withdrawing their shots from at least istock... or at least deactivating them? punishment due. the best would be everybody removing their ports from micro sites and uploading them to sites like alamy. think big, do something like this, or they'll just keep raping you untill you look like swiss cheese. do you people ever do this thing called THINKING? it helps you make connections between certain phenomenona. of course you don't have sales on a place like alamy, when you got millions of files on sale for a couple fo bucks. jezuz... : ( 6
Shutterstock.com / Re: How Much do you get per Subscription Download on SS as of Jan. 1st 2011?« on: January 14, 2011, 12:04 »
infantilism kicks in: 'opinion I don't like' = 'troll.' Grow up! : )
7
Shutterstock.com / Re: How Much do you get per Subscription Download on SS as of Jan. 1st 2011?« on: January 14, 2011, 11:43 »Well, with 45 contributors having voted so far, I guess that answers your question Race! The question reamining then is how come ppl using just a ounce of common sense didn't refuse that crap offer? It's hard to beleive ppl are that stupid and shoprtsighted, but looks to be that way. It's just sad : ( 8
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Kelly announces slightly downsized RC targets« on: January 14, 2011, 11:38 »That's a fair point about personal websites SNP. I'm just concerned that people feel pushed into it by the failure of one agency to deliver on it's fat-fee promise, rather than taking a leap by choice. ok, how 'bout everyone withdrawing their shots from at least istock... or at least deactivating them? punishment due. the best would be everybody removing their ports from micro sites and uploading them to sites like alamy. think big, do something like this, or they'll just keep raping you untill you look like swiss cheese. 9
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Kelly announces slightly downsized RC targets« on: January 14, 2011, 09:47 »I keep hearing all of the analysts saying having your own site is the way to go. "The future". I'm not buying it unless some new innovative method is developed for connecting buyers with contributors. In my experience, all of the people who have contacted me directly want freebies. Buyers use stock agencies. Freebie hunters use Flickr and Google. There are exceptions of course but it's rare. Every once in a while you hear about someone on Flickr making a sale. your site's pagerank is 0 shutterstock, istock, getty: 7 10
Shutterstock.com / Re: How Much do you get per Subscription Download on SS as of Jan. 1st 2011?« on: January 14, 2011, 09:45 »Well, with 45 contributors having voted so far, I guess that answers your question Race! You have to sell in volume because they are low paying. 11
Shutterstock.com / Re: How Much do you get per Subscription Download on SS as of Jan. 1st 2011?« on: January 14, 2011, 07:39 »Well, with 45 contributors having voted so far, I guess that answers your question Race! What does it matter? All microstock agenciesare low paying. 12
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock Watch 2011« on: January 11, 2011, 10:34 »... top tier within two years. Of course, it's not "easy" but then $10,000 is a lot of money to most people.... 10 000 in two years is a lot of money?? Not even in my country. That's less then minimal wage /month. 13
Shutterstock.com / Re: 111,655 new photos added in the past week« on: January 09, 2011, 11:56 »... remove the old stuff that is not selling! ... How would that help contributors? It might help the company a bit, with some really minro cut in strage expanses, but that's not a big deal anyway. Actually going around weeding out stuff might just cost more then leting them lay around. 14
Shutterstock.com / Re: 111,655 new photos added in the past week« on: January 09, 2011, 07:25 »They already have more images then buyers need, they need to do something. As for increasing quality in favor of sales that's nonsense. Microstock has bad taste written all over it, at least half of the bestsellers (if not most) are the most distastefull rubbish you would ever see. Technical standrads are already unreasonably high, pushing them is useless. 15
Shutterstock.com / Re: 111,655 new photos added in the past week« on: January 09, 2011, 06:28 »
They already have more images then buyers need, they need to do something. As for increasing quality in favor of sales that's nonsense. Microstock has bad taste written all over it, at least half of the bestsellers (if not most) are the most distastefull rubbish you would ever see.
16
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock F5 epic fail« on: January 06, 2011, 06:17 »
This is all very depressing. Cheer up, here is a little reminder of how naive stock and its cliches really are if you look at it with bit more intellect and education than what, lets say, a flea has : )
http://thehairpin.com/2011/01/women-laughing-alone-with-salad/ 17
General Photography Discussion / Re: Save as Tiff or PSP?« on: January 05, 2011, 07:18 »
I don't trust any brand by now, with a few very rare exceptions. As people sinking into consumeridiotism get dumber and dumber, these corps get the chance to move away from reliability, value etc (they are expensive), and rely solely on marketing to sell stuff to the common idiot. Many used-to-be reputable brands sunk into junk category in the last few years. The problem with HDs is that if they are broken, data rescue can get scary expensive. At the place I know where I live they charge several 100 $ just for taking the drive to have a look at it. 18
General Photography Discussion / Re: Save as Tiff or PSP?« on: January 03, 2011, 08:31 »
You'll just love it when that $60 drive makes that tipical 'trapped tiny fly' sound and won't be accesible anymore. 19
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Credit card fraud not something new to IS« on: December 29, 2010, 05:32 »Wow Cathy...thanks you mean may 2009 20
General Stock Discussion / Re: Our digital future: Predictions for 2011 and beyond...« on: December 28, 2010, 15:49 »
get your pinhole cameras now! it's the future : >
vote for me in 2011! my porgram: - free beer - hot chicks(dudes) for everyone - eternal life 21
General Stock Discussion / Re: Kodak's patent spat threatens photo web sites« on: December 23, 2010, 11:18 »as economy crumbles, I think we will see more and more companies viciously using non productive means trying to get their hands on the remaining few extra dollars going around, as compensation. Capitalism is going to be showing it's worst face - expect that in microstock too (just look at istock) "Your reasoning is terrible at best" Where is yours? : ) 22
General Stock Discussion / Re: Kodak's patent spat threatens photo web sites« on: December 23, 2010, 11:17 »as economy crumbles, I think we will see more and more companies viciously using non productive means trying to get their hands on the remaining few extra dollars going around, as compensation. Capitalism is going to be showing it's worst face - expect that in microstock too (just look at istock) 1. Where is the leap? It's a direct connection. 2. I didn't condemn capitalism, I basically said it's getting perverted. Not a big surprise in a crisis. 23
General Stock Discussion / Re: Kodak's patent spat threatens photo web sites« on: December 23, 2010, 09:44 »
as economy crumbles, I think we will see more and more companies viciously using non productive means trying to get their hands on the remaining few extra dollars going around, as compensation. Capitalism is going to be showing it's worst face - expect that in microstock too (just look at istock)
24
General Stock Discussion / Re: Property Release Case US« on: December 20, 2010, 05:27 »
what a sad bullsh*t case. another pampered lazy american trying to make money thru lawsuit. exactly what harm has come to them from this? a few people asking if they are selling something? ohh, the horror Go on like this, and you won't be able to shoot anything, coz anything belongs to someone. The streets and parks here belong to the municipal government. The beautiful nature reserve area close to my town actually belongs to NortForest Ltd. entrusted by the state to manage it, so no more landcapes stock. Maybe the sky and the clouds... altho the airspace is courtesy of the state and it's military : D
25
Shutterstock.com / Re: Huh? Can they do it like this?« on: December 19, 2010, 11:05 »Cmon, Hugo, explain whats going on here, you post this provocative post declaring your innocence, then disappear? If its all a big mistake, say something, its obvious youre reading. since when does he owe you or the rest of the bench birds any 'clarification' in a semi seriuos matter like this? interesting how some ppl seem to take the side of the ms sites after those have been raping them so hard for years a freight train could pass thru their aholes : > stockholm syndrome? |
|