MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - stokfoto
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 35
101
« on: January 23, 2009, 02:45 »
especially for the past two months JI and Photos.com sales became more than my StockXpert sales in numbers so my overall income from StockXpert is in declining trend:(
102
« on: January 21, 2009, 09:16 »
if you like you are welcome to use mine too.oh well it's just a camera though.
103
« on: January 19, 2009, 18:22 »
nowadays I too experience a significant decline of DLs at SS I don't know why it would be though despite the fact that I have been uploading as usual-if not more- It could be because of the current economical situations but I believe increasing competition among the contributes must have something to do with it too and I also believe on demand sales some kind of affects on subs sales at SS
104
« on: January 17, 2009, 08:41 »
lately my sales have been pretty good too but I am very cautious as I don't know what will happen with the best match 2.0 if I am not wrong it is not in effect yet?
105
« on: January 16, 2009, 16:10 »
Thanks for posting this no surprise I guess. SS, IS then StockXpert and now FT is in stock footage business I am sure DT will follow them too. let's see how they'll do
106
« on: January 15, 2009, 19:09 »
you might have already noticed this statement on your StockXpert profile page: quoted from StockXpert : ALERT! SYSTEM UPDATE ON JANUARY 22ND
We'll be upgrading our site on Thursday, Jan. 22nd beginning at 9:00 PM EST. Images will not be available for download for a few hours. We hope this advance notice will help you plan your projects accordingly.
I wonder if there is going to be a major change and if this is related to getty takeover?
107
« on: January 09, 2009, 11:37 »
108
« on: January 07, 2009, 10:22 »
simple answer to your question if money isn't issue I'd get the 580 as it is more powerful than the 430. I am planing to buy either of the flashes but I am on a bit tight budged so I'd probably get the 430 but once again my first choice would be 580 and I personally wouldn't choose anything else but there are also some sigma flashes that get good reviews like sigma 530 dg etc. but if you are looking for a non TTL flash there are a lot more choices but like I said I'd personally stick with canon
good luck with your choice
109
« on: January 07, 2009, 05:51 »
my sales have been significantly slow since mid dec 2008 and it continues till now as expected . I hope sales will start to pick up soon since the first week of jan is over. I would like to know how your experience is and expectations on when sale would get back to normal?
Cheers
110
« on: January 07, 2009, 05:46 »
considering that it is a shareware it is a very hand software but obviously the features and quality they offer nowhere near photoshop and their user interface drives me mad,I mean disappearing windows,lack of brushes etc. I hope they will improve it so I'd be happy to use it.but for the time being for those on a tight budget I think even PS elements would do a better job.but then again GIMP offer a lot for a freeware.
111
« on: December 20, 2008, 20:08 »
Hi Moshun, thank you very much for your response. For the moment I am an exclusive videographer to IS so I can't upload my work elsewhere as RF unless I give up exclusivity there. So,for the time being I will focus on my RF work then. Thanks a lot.
112
« on: December 19, 2008, 19:01 »
I think you better start calling shops i'm sure you will find one if you want to buy it now. Anyway there are a few cameras here as they told me www.calumetphoto.co.uk
thank you very much for the link I'll check it out. oh btw I meant to say january in my earlier post not june,gosh what was I thinking:)
113
« on: December 19, 2008, 18:59 »
santa bring my present today.... :-)
5D mk2
Tomorow is gona be a "Saturday Shutting Fever"
lucky you! congrats on you new gear!
114
« on: December 19, 2008, 18:57 »
congratulations! great images!
115
« on: December 19, 2008, 16:54 »
Official Canon statement about the black dots and banding problems: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0812/08121902canon5ddots.asp
Thanks CofkoCof for posting this.now we know they admit the problem and working on it. I hope it'll be sorted out soon otherwise it'd be really big disappointment after all waiting and high expectations. Fingers crossed
116
« on: December 19, 2008, 16:25 »
hi AVAVA, thank you very much for your input. I am an exclusive videographer to IS and that exclusivity is limited to RF (royalty free)license so I was wondering if there was mid range (like micro stock) agencies that accepts-sells video footage as RM (rights managed/licensed )I am hoping to upload editorial footage to such sites. as for the video camera I am planing to use 5d m2 which should offer the quality required (it is not known yet but there is a possibility even getty and corbis could accept the videos created with 5d m2)but for me it too early too apply with them so that is the reason why I am seeking a mid stock/micro stock footage agencies.
once again thank you very much for your response.
117
« on: December 19, 2008, 13:46 »
I use mpeg clip stream for final conversation and it works fine it is freeware http://www.squared5.com/
118
« on: December 19, 2008, 13:10 »
I am looking for stock video sites that sells stock videos with RM license .I am not talking about the big guys like getty but things like Pond5 if I am not wrong pond5 only sells RF? your advice will be much appreciated too.thank you in advance
119
« on: December 19, 2008, 12:59 »
what about a mid solution? getting two flash heads and two small strobes for background isolation,which is what I do,and works fine for me.
120
« on: December 19, 2008, 12:56 »
Ac-foto (germany) have them in stock (I just looked). So you can order it from there .
thank you for the heads up! Nice to know they have it in stock but the price is a little bit high to my expectations. I guess I'll wait for a UK retailer to have it in stock with a lower price tag.hopefully it will be mid june or early feb .
121
« on: December 18, 2008, 16:20 »
overall it is going to be really bad month for me and very likely to be the worst month of the year and since the holidays are about to arrive we can't expect much from the last two weeks(at least I don't)I hope things will be better from the second week of january...
122
« on: December 18, 2008, 15:07 »
I haven't pre-ordered so I am not expecting delivery:( . Any news on availability in europe? any ideas (rumors) when it'd be stock plenty ,or will it ever be?
123
« on: December 18, 2008, 10:39 »
You can't witness your own signature. Technically you need three people to sign the release. Photographer, model (or guardian) and witness. Some sites will let you be the photographer and the guardian of a minor but the witness must always be a different person.
thank you azurelaroux for your response and suggestions.I appreciate it.may be my first post wasn't so clear as English is not my mother tongue to be more precise yes the MR into question was signed by three persons,the photographer,one of the parents and the other parent as the witness and the rejection reason I was given was that the parents can't be the witness. but the point I am actually try to make here is that there is not much use dealing with so much paper work here like you mentioned above it is the photographer who should be worried about having a valid MR. this kind of rejections only cause delay of approval process (and it affected my approval rate negatively which has certain impact on DT search engine)I can re-upload the files with a new MR but that is not the point here I just don't want to get ambiguous rejections because of model releases. I sometimes get MR rejections from IS because the MR contains typed-in information (e.g. names, addresses, dates).
,ironically once I had a file rejected because the MR was hand written and they didn't find it formal enough.....
124
« on: December 18, 2008, 09:19 »
And just because the last names are different does not mean they both are'nt the parents ...
true,but what is wrong with it even if they both were parents.
125
« on: December 17, 2008, 18:49 »
unfortunately not for me:( I think this is going to be WME for me.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 35
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|