|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - bolsher
26
« on: May 01, 2014, 03:16 »
If we want to exist in future, wen need an organization.
27
« on: May 01, 2014, 02:32 »
I think the dollarphotclub will be growing in the next years, because its the cheapest non sub model in the microstock.
Shutterstock must be do something, or many buyers especially in europe will go to this agency. Fotolia will delete the opt out or the ranking without opt out will be uninteresting. We are in the hands of this agency and they are not very friendly.
Not many images are opt out at this time. I have take a look at food. There are round 3,650000 Images at DPC, fotolia 3,830000. So we must tell this to all contributors that there is an opt out and why it is urgent to do this.
28
« on: April 30, 2014, 15:56 »
they lie. our partner lies. our agency lies. they tell "stories", but not the truth. How we can make business with them?
29
« on: April 30, 2014, 15:10 »
Fotolia is not such a small agency, but i think you re right when you say they want to be the first with this step. So i tell you something more:
If they are the first, there will be a second and a third.
And the bill will be paid from the contributors. What we want to do if Shutterstock make such like this? We re out.
30
« on: April 30, 2014, 14:40 »
You destroy our market and yours too
31
« on: April 30, 2014, 14:39 »
Mat,
Fotolia must sent a message like deleting 10$ Package. Also all images must disabled as standard from DPC. I am at a rank between 40 and 70. I will delete my images too. Im very sorry i cannot see my images sold out.
32
« on: April 30, 2014, 14:33 »
All complain about Fotolia $ 1. But Shutterstock sells but also for just $ 0.25?
Someone explain me - whats the different thing with these two. I also hate to give my images in highest size for 0,25-0,35$.
?
Big mistake: Sub= Buyer download what he don t need because he has a sub, daily limited. So he download 25 images. dollarphotoclub: NO SUB! He bought for 10 or 99 dollar a package, download WHAT HE NEEDS!!!, ergo we can't live from the amount. Also Dollarphotoclub get the buyers from the other agencies real subs. And i don t want to talk about the "Mini-Sub" at Fotolia. where Fotolia earns about 90%, thats another story...
33
« on: April 30, 2014, 14:10 »
Jipee!
34
« on: April 30, 2014, 13:46 »
I have 30 ELs in a month at ss, 1 in a year at FT, no joke.
35
« on: April 30, 2014, 13:05 »
I don't see any hope of a turnaround. Many people are clinging to the idea that SS is somehow our friend and is wearing the white hat, but I'd say that's a fantasy. Let the minus-ing begin...
Look at their HQ in N.Y., there you can see wheres our money.
36
« on: April 30, 2014, 12:23 »
Or spend the tickets and hotel rooms :-)
37
« on: April 30, 2014, 12:00 »
To mee,too, i live in europe...crazy
39
« on: April 30, 2014, 07:21 »
Those are not organic search hits, those are paid ads, from Google Adwords. They just paid to be in that position. You can pay for position 1 2 and 3, position 4 and up start on the right side. Still, pushing their dollar club, but those results are not organic search placements.
Absolutely the right way to get big buyers! Same as a Facebook site :-)
40
« on: April 30, 2014, 01:14 »
i have deleted one hundred more, show must go on
41
« on: April 30, 2014, 00:58 »
me too
42
« on: April 29, 2014, 17:45 »
Thank you guys for your work! That was really great, big thank you to all of you.
43
« on: April 29, 2014, 17:26 »
@ fotoramka: Some of the receivables are satisfies.
Some not, is there a way to mark the unfulfilled at the website? Some of the contributors think almost is ok now, so there were an actual status optimal.
44
« on: April 29, 2014, 16:43 »
+1
45
« on: April 29, 2014, 16:22 »
announce exclusivity I'd see no wrong. (mass exodus)
Thats my first idea, too and i think this is the next big step.
46
« on: April 29, 2014, 15:15 »
we should make these greedy and destructive agencies superfluous.
SYMBIOSTOCK!!!!!
I wouldnt recommend Symbiostock at this point either, and you know why.
But why?
47
« on: April 29, 2014, 13:57 »
The petition must say close this stupid
48
« on: April 29, 2014, 13:56 »
A comment from a buyer in the Dollar Photo Clubs facebook page:
Initial impression is....WOW! Great prices for some good resolution photos. I've been an istockphoto.com user for years, even their low price stuff still runs a few bucks for the smallest resolution. Look forward to giving you a try on my next project!
And like this person, many others are commenting on how much money they will save using DPC compared to what they are spending now elsewhere.
Is this the previously untapped market that DPC is hitting?
Exactly this "new" market they means!
49
« on: April 29, 2014, 13:54 »
it is NO Sub site,
No Credit site
its an on demand site!!!
50
« on: April 29, 2014, 13:29 »
dollarphotoclub only want to be one big thing:
the cheapest image marketplace at the net
i say only one sentence from their advertising:
Why pay more?
That declared everything of this new business modell!
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
