pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dingles

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18
276
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Changes to Main Collection pricing
« on: June 28, 2013, 18:56 »
I have to say so far this month my sales are strong. In fact I have had more iStock sales than normal as the past few months most of my sales have been Getty and PP sales. Maybe just an influx due to the changes, but this naive mofo is staying positive for now ;)

277
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Changes to Main Collection pricing
« on: June 27, 2013, 17:46 »
I said it before, they have so many issues outstanding and they keep adding on top. I wish their efforts were spent fixing what they had and not adding more.

278
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock downtrend
« on: June 26, 2013, 20:31 »
Nothing worst than getting a group of the same photoshoot with just variations of the same thing in one search...not just an iStock issue.

279
So far my sales directly from IS have picked up, previously the majority of my sales came from the PP and Getty mirror...I'm exclusive video, but not photos. Most of my content is in main and sig...since they are only mirroring sig+ I guess my Getty income will flatline. My PP income should be same...except they haven't put anything on the PP site in a couple months...at least not from me.

280
Companies do pay yearly fees for microstock subscriptions...so paying a flat yearly fee for software isn't implausible. The biggest headache is justification...every company I ever worked for required justification and it almost always comes down to the value that is provided versus costs. And they always want at least a couple of alternatives. This is a good time for alternative software to build and market...they won't dominate, but Adobe has allowed room for competition to come in a take a piece of the pie...previously there was very little room.

Justification is always necessary with every expense, but the cost isn't very much. I pay for my monthly subscription cost in a day, and I'm not a very profitable business.

It's not the price it's price versus what is being offered. For example I currently have CS6...my company generally upgrades us every 2-3 years unless we push with reason...my next upgrade is going to be a tough sell because in top of figuring out the added value the upgrade brings, They have to accept a yearly subscription fee (monthly won't fly)...so technically they may be paying 2-3 times more for the software over the course of 3 years as opposed to a single upgrade fee to a version we would use 2-3 years typically around $300-600...now I will be $1800...may seem like small peanuts to you, but considering I work along side 20 other designers and developers we are talking 12,000 vs 36,000 for software over the course of 3 years. To the corporate bean counters...that is a hit.

281
Companies do pay yearly fees for microstock subscriptions...so paying a flat yearly fee for software isn't implausible. The biggest headache is justification...every company I ever worked for required justification and it almost always comes down to the value that is provided versus costs. And they always want at least a couple of alternatives. This is a good time for alternative software to build and market...they won't dominate, but Adobe has allowed room for competition to come in a take a piece of the pie...previously there was very little room.

282
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales Anxiety
« on: June 22, 2013, 17:56 »
They have yet to move any of my files from rhe past two month to PP sites, does anything run smooth over there?

283
Pretty average sales for me so far. Not enough time to really say good, bad, or same.

284
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Clients sending designer elsewhere ...
« on: June 20, 2013, 22:42 »
I had this happen long ago. The plus side is that with so many indies the chances are greater the content s available. Lose where for a lower price. The downside is that the more this is the case there is just less value to our work.

285
My company will not pay a monthly fee for software...point blank. Nothing I can do about it...they don't budget that way and all software gets purchased by contracted projects...they don't have th cash flo to pay monthly if they have to commit to a certain length. I know my previous company was the same way...Adobe has not considered this. Looks like we will be using CS6 for a long time and will probably. Revert to alternatives after. Similar to the subscription service Autodesk has pushed, it is hard to justify such a thing to upper management. It was hard enough to justify upgrades in general, let alone reoccurring fees. Also losing th ability to be able to open your own work because you no longer have the subscription is a big deal...right now I can not upgrade and be able to open all my work....however if I won't with CC an decided it wasn't working out, I can no longer open any of my source files?

286
Here is a problem, I've had exclusive content that was suppose to mirror to Getty for months but has been held up do to tech issues with their system...now that content was deemed signature collection, so now it will not see Getty...another swift kick in the nuts

287
A bit upset. My exclusive content has all been put into signature level...which is fine except they won't mirror to Getty anymore...apparently only Sig+ and Vetta get mirrored now. Outside of that little kick in the nuts, I don't have a problem with where my content was placed.

288
Nothing new of mine has been transferred to PP sites. I was thinking it could have to do with he collection changes. Very upsetting considering I added a bunch of files recently that are all buried in best match and not even on the PP sites. I haven't had a single sale since the middle of last month...Seems my exclusive content (video) hasn't been ported to Getty yet either :(. Kind of hard to stay positive and keep building more if you know it isn't being seen. iStock is making my decision to branch out a much easier one I have to say

289
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IStock stale
« on: June 07, 2013, 14:59 »
I'm not sure what is going on over there, but as of early May my sales have stopped completely. Very disappointing.

290
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IStock stale
« on: June 04, 2013, 12:14 »
As long as they do not change the demeaning upload procedure it wont change much.

Not if they use Deepmeta. And as far as video FTP

291
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IStock stale
« on: June 04, 2013, 10:44 »
Keep in mind I am coming in as someone a bit newer and with a smaller portfolio. I have had a steady growth pattern over the past year or so, seems the recent halt coincides with the unlimited uploads. That mixed with the best match, all my files new and old seem to be buried deep in search...previously I was pretty happy with results. With the mass uploading I see a few issues that aren't being addressed...the first being poor irrelevant keywording seems to be rampant again, contributors aren't self editing and just uploading everything, they opened up unlimited uploads BEFORE they worked out the best match issues.

292
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sharing a Link
« on: June 04, 2013, 10:37 »
I don't think the process could be any more straight forward. The issue is that there is no return. I suspect the system doesn't work and IS is okay with playing the naive card because they don't have to pay out

293
iStockPhoto.com / IStock stale
« on: June 03, 2013, 22:53 »
Sales have stopped over the past few weeks for me at IS. I'm thinking the floodgates have opened with the unlimited uploads and now those of us with smaller portfolios are buried in the sea of additions. Anyone else noticing this?

294
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sharing a Link
« on: June 03, 2013, 22:41 »
I don't find it complicated...it just simply doesn't seem to work as intended.

295
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sharing a Link
« on: June 03, 2013, 19:52 »
Have nev had a single referral. I am signed up and have shared links and there have been plenty of clicks...yet not a single referral. I doubt the system works.

296
How about multimedia designer, animator, stock photographer, illustrator, an video-grapher

297
iStockPhoto.com / Re: 24h vector sale, 50% off
« on: May 23, 2013, 14:52 »
Ah, I didn't notice an email, but that is good then

298
iStockPhoto.com / Re: 24h vector sale, 50% off
« on: May 23, 2013, 14:38 »
Then there is no excuse for them not to inform us when the sale goes into effect then. I know many contributors who are also designers and can easily drive sales to iStock, however, iStock gives us very little reason to ever do so.

299
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Buzz of Istock !!
« on: May 23, 2013, 14:27 »
I agree, although they possibly could of just not published them (sounds easier than it may be...this is iStock after all), it was not their mistake nor their responsibility. Besides there is no need to 'dig' for crap if you want to trash iStock...especially on these forums ;)

300
iStockPhoto.com / Re: 24h vector sale, 50% off
« on: May 23, 2013, 14:06 »
I love how we foot the bill for discounts we aren't even made aware of until after the fact. I think it's fine that they do it for promotional reasons and it is even okay that both sides are essentially taking a cut for this, but they could at least inform contributors when such things are coming...hell we could even help promote such things. I guess that would be expecting too much

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors