|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - roede-orm
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22
401
« on: February 12, 2014, 07:53 »
Scam is the right word for it! What have a standard puchase to do with any subscription? I'm afraid, thats the peak of an iceberg!
403
« on: February 12, 2014, 03:50 »
Through a hint of a photographer I found my entire Depositphotos port on the German Agency Shotshop. Shotshop seems to be a reseller of DP. All who offer directly to Shotshop have now often the same images twice at Shotshop. The problem is - they are also available at different prices! If I would buy a photo from the Depositphotos portfolio in XLLarge-VP at ShotShop, I would pay 19,90 . Don't know, what earnings you get from DP, for me it's mostly cent amounts or sometimes 2, xx dollars. The profit margin of DP must be better than margins of Istock. And there is no opt out option! For me this is a reason to cancel both DP and Shotshop.
404
« on: February 09, 2014, 13:36 »
But you can always save your work as a TIFF file with layers.
405
« on: February 08, 2014, 16:57 »
Compared to a classic painting a photo features (assuming it is well focused) more sharpness. But still classic paintings can also show many details accentuated. And portrait photography with, for example, a Nikon D800, a 105s f 2.8 lens can look so sharp that they just do not work well. So I think sharpness is a relative size.
406
« on: January 30, 2014, 10:07 »
Done - again 
407
« on: January 21, 2014, 00:44 »
When you not deal as a professional with professionals 
408
« on: January 20, 2014, 09:06 »
Had two sales there in 2012, via Zoonar. Each sale made 50 Euro.
409
« on: January 19, 2014, 18:22 »
Don't agree. Sometimes noise is unavoidable. In summer, when the camera is warm, for example. Even long exposure may cause noise.
410
« on: January 19, 2014, 11:25 »
Dfine from NIK Software, beacause they have this really good U-Point technology, so I can reduce noise exactly where it is necessary (if it is ever necessary).
411
« on: January 17, 2014, 14:51 »
Hm, 36 x optical zoom (Astro Zoom) sounds good for - nothing
412
« on: January 17, 2014, 08:14 »
For security reasons you should completely erase this thread and ask your question in general without details in a new thread. And, like Colette, I would advise you, change all your password in all agencies as soon as possible!!!
As far as I know it's inpossible to change a user name in most agencies.
413
« on: January 17, 2014, 07:51 »
Got me inspired so I wanted to share!
Thank you for sharing these links, really wonderful pictures!
414
« on: January 15, 2014, 16:31 »
That article talks about the "club" being exclusive - because who wants those overused RF images - but then says they'll have 25 million images. Where are they going to get 25 million exclusive images? Was wondering the same!
416
« on: January 12, 2014, 13:40 »
Sean, if you in Shutterstock follow the link "your image gallery" you will see, what we talk about. Shutterstock changed the design of the image gallery.
417
« on: January 12, 2014, 11:19 »
Yeah, looks much better! I like it too! However, reminds me of the portfolio page of Mostphotos.
418
« on: January 12, 2014, 11:15 »
"Limited Extended" sounds generally very interesting, right? I would suggest an alternative: "limited unlimited" 
419
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:34 »
Really? Last year, they demanded even a location for each shooting on the releases!
420
« on: January 10, 2014, 03:28 »
I think this is a good decision. And it will benefit everyone, because Sean's good imagery will draw more customers to Shutterstock. I wish you good luck!
421
« on: December 16, 2013, 18:02 »
It makes me wonder if this YAY streaming model actually does not violate the Norwegian copyright law, as a control of possible injury is completely excluded.
422
« on: December 16, 2013, 17:08 »
How many times a place is photographed doesn't says anything about the quality of the photos.
423
« on: December 16, 2013, 15:55 »
YAY-Nanostock in any case!
424
« on: December 16, 2013, 12:37 »
If you truly intend to go through with this plan, I sincerely hope you are soon out of business. .
It's just a question of time, I hope.
425
« on: December 15, 2013, 13:19 »
It isn't that surprising that a small site is trying to carve out a market by whatever means. The surprising thing is the amount of people that seem to be submitting there.
Agree. But there are still small agencies that pay decent prices. I have in a year for example at Zoonar or Phopress more sales than I ever had at YAY. And Phopress for example not even appeared on the poll results list.
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
