76
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone (individual) with 50k+ files online here?
« on: November 11, 2018, 10:59 »Comers?
Being ironic?
Show on road.
Text a lot?
I like your comers ... even if they aren't correct Engrish.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 76
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone (individual) with 50k+ files online here?« on: November 11, 2018, 10:59 »Comers? I like your comers ... even if they aren't correct Engrish. 77
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone (individual) with 50k+ files online here?« on: November 10, 2018, 21:20 »Yes. I thought about that one. I think you are right. Which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English online, unless its a grammar forum. ;-)Yes I thought about that one I think you are right which goes to show it's never a good idea to correct someone's English on line unless its a grammar forum ;-).I think "greatest number" sounds more elegant "most" would be the most economical. "single" is also redundant. "Who has the most files at an Agency?" I would suggest is optimal. lawls. 78
Off Topic / Re: Stop The Hate - VOTE!« on: November 09, 2018, 21:27 »If I was American I certainly wouldn't vote Republican, but I also have doubts about the Democratic party. Luckily in the Netherlands we don't have a two-party system, but various political parties to choose from. You're both wrong, it's a bureaucracy. 79
Off Topic / Re: Stop The Hate - VOTE!« on: November 09, 2018, 21:22 »I voted but still feel the hate In Utah they were up late celebrating in the streets for the Med MJ turnout. Now we can let the theocracy ruin pot too. lol. Being rude is not his job the others seem to get it!! He wasn't rude, he was asking legitimate questions that needed answers. The other reporters ask the same questions. Trump is just biased against 80
Off Topic / Re: Stop The Hate - VOTE!« on: November 08, 2018, 23:13 »Voter suppression continues, I see. gerrymandering is just the start of this one. 81
Adobe Stock / Re: Important Fotolia Announcement« on: November 06, 2018, 21:44 »
Holy crap?! Two actual people to interact with?! That's not the way this microstock thing is supposed to work. You're supposed to ignore us and treat us like poop! This is intense. I don't know if I can handle it. 82
Adobe Stock / Re: Important Fotolia Announcement« on: November 05, 2018, 22:28 »
Sooooo .... who's contributed right from LR before? Is there a tutorial somewhere? That might motivate me to actually get back into the game.
83
Adobe Stock / Re: Important Fotolia Announcement« on: November 05, 2018, 22:18 »Hello everyone, Thanks Mat, I'm wondering what this means as a Fotolia Subscriber as well. I've got a herd of credits chilling in there. 84
Shutterstock.com / Re: !! URGENT: Shutterstock experiencing major hack !!« on: November 01, 2018, 20:41 »
I changed it anyway ... because it was an old password but, bruteforce targeting of user accounts isn't a "hack" so there very well could be some attempts ... but, it'd take years for them to even make a dent.
85
General Stock Discussion / Re: We don't owe these companies anything« on: November 01, 2018, 17:38 »From an agency point of view the commission system is genius. Nearly all the risk is taken by the contributors hence agencies can limp along on a shoestring selling almost nothing. Commission is great for all sorts of things. Screw fixed costs, especially when your just starting and sales are low. 86
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS worst Spammed Portfolios« on: October 19, 2018, 23:21 »This is, what SS is accepting now. How are you storing things on your CPU? 87
General Stock Discussion / Re: Music Modernization Act is signed into law now. How about microstock?« on: October 16, 2018, 04:42 »
The whole microstock thing is ... basically pennies now anyway. lol. Just leave it alone and collect the royalties.
All of our digital work is stolen, used as logos and whatever . else they can even dream of. (I actually argued about that specifically on a logo design forum yesterday). I'm moving ... most of my creative endeavors elsewhere. It's too time consuming to sort, tag and upload photos to Micro to even worry about. :/ I'd rather sell them direct and make 10 than keep contributing to this crap show to make 15. 88
General Stock Discussion / Re: shutterstock earnings question« on: October 13, 2018, 18:59 »Okay, interesting. tbh, those portfolios are hurting themselves even. Nobody in the middle of a project with a deadline wants to scan through thousands of incredibly similar images. I'm sure, like me, they search ... grab the one that will work, and proceed with their work. 89
Adobe Stock / Re: Creative Cloud giveway for Adobe Stock Contributors« on: October 09, 2018, 23:10 »Meh, tried to test out Lightroom CC but for Windows 10 only. :-( It works fine on 7 for me 90
Selling Stock Direct / Re: Feedback for my own microstock website« on: October 08, 2018, 16:57 »I used bluehost in the past when I had a site selling my images. It was slow then, too, because there are many, many sites crammed onto their server. There are some things you may be able to do to speed it up a little, but if you dont pay the money for a better hosting plan or dedicated server, you might be stuck. I know I didnt want to spend the money for a better hosting plan, so I went with the basic plan. Its a dilemma...you dont want to spend the money if you arent going to make any back, but if you dont spend the money, the site is difficult for buyers to navigate. Bluehost is like ... premium-budget hosting. lol. Not the best and certainly not the worst. The site looks good man. I'm glad you answered the question about selling designs though Good luck. 91
General Stock Discussion / Re: Backgrounds« on: October 07, 2018, 12:33 »Hi DallasP. No I don't. I don't do composites. And no, I don't want to use someone else's photo that's on the stock websites. I haven't ordered from Ink and Elm yet either. There are wood panel backgrounds and I asked if it is okay to put it on my table and lay for example fruits on it or a cake etc. and upload that. It all started when I saw a vinyl snow background a view days ago on eBay. The seller has stitched two photos together but I saw the top part of it on SS. I went on SS to see if I can maybe make my own snow background or if I am just not good enough. I was shocked to see that image on SS and asked here if it is okay to use it if I put a still life on the part that lays on the table but the sky with snow would be visible. It didn't feel right to me to do that and so I asked. I do very few images and certainly not composites. There is a lady I know who makes here own backgrounds and before I bought one I asked her if I am allowed to put cake etc. on it and sell the photo with her background on the stock websites. I am not a low life rat. I asked here because I know of a lot of people who buy for example on Ink and Elms website and they sell backgrounds to photographers. It worries me, that's why I asked. I am a photographer. I don't want to do harm to others. And I don't know what GTFO means. Wait ... so you're selling the table? 92
General Stock Discussion / Re: Backgrounds« on: October 04, 2018, 16:55 »Why do I need to contact Ink and Elm? They bought the backgrounds and are printing them on vinyl as photography backgrounds. Are they doing something wrong? My question is if I can buy such a background and put a still life in front of it and upload it to the stock websites. You want to use a composite of other people's images to sell on stock? GTFO. 93
Adobe Stock / Re: Minimum Payment Commission Increase« on: September 29, 2018, 15:00 »Hi Everyone, Thanks Mat! 94
Image Sleuth / Re: Shutterstock seller, selling my photos as their own. Mostly jewelry and watches« on: September 20, 2018, 15:02 »Thanks for posting. I have very few jewelery shots, but I did take a look . It really shouldn't but, they use that technology for the similar images function ... t'would be silly to run the same function to find duplicates :/ I still find it amazing that google can pull up exact matches and 10,000 similar images yet, the companies working in the ACTUAL IMAGE INDUSTRY can't. 95
General Stock Discussion / Re: Who lives exclusively from microstock?« on: September 19, 2018, 14:20 »
The doom and gloom guys just expect what they had 10 years ago and want to pay their bills. It's all just slow and hopefully steady now. 96
Newbie Discussion / Re: Earnings of a wedding photographer in stock market« on: September 16, 2018, 14:25 »This isn't a criticism of your photos, only an assessment of their likely usefulness as stock images, but I can't think of many uses for these types of portraits (which is essentially what they are). Summarized ... great photos but, maybe not good stock. 97
Newbie Discussion / Re: Earnings of a wedding photographer in stock market« on: September 16, 2018, 14:23 »Well, those are more fine art than wedding. Not what I was expecting. I dont think theyll have much use for wedding advertising. How would you see them being used? How are you going to get releases from people who have already compensated you for you work? I legit was expecting event photos. lol. Thinking "Who would really want their wedding sold as stock" bahhaha 98
Shutterstock.com / Re: Slow server« on: September 13, 2018, 18:10 »Same here. Shutterstock servers DO HAVE A PROBLEM. Uploading takes ages and creates errors in Filezilla and other software I use to upload. Often files arrive corrupted. It's always slow ... I assume that it's because the server is in mass. 99
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe sales in past two years« on: September 12, 2018, 23:44 »My sales in the last two years on Adobe\Fotolia did not change much (flat line), but I increased the portfolio size over 3000 files... Something must be up with that, I'm getting more sales. I even thought about starting to illustrate for stock again mostly because of the adobe sales on my rather shabby illustrating. 100
Off Topic / 9/11 - New Model« on: September 12, 2018, 23:12 »
I may have a tiny model
I can't find my card reader ... just going through mails (all the topics are lame while I was away). Theodore James Price 9/11/18 7lbs eleven oz. 20" and his little butt has to stay in the hospital another day for some testing tomorrow Just checking out his heart or something. I had to come home ... hospital was driving me batty and they didn't serve beer and frowned on smoking. |
|