|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Cesar
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11
126
« on: April 27, 2015, 15:46 »
stop uploading to dp, who cares if it is one month.
127
« on: April 20, 2015, 14:28 »
if you sort by new yuri istock portfolio , first 10 pages are very average photos and extremly similar. boring, not a work by a pro.
128
« on: April 17, 2015, 04:13 »
Yestarday was again little lower.
more reasons could be problem:
1. too much upload ( too many contributors on this boat ( also new))
2. subs on IS
3. new subscriptions plans
4. in march you buy images to finish projects before summer, maybe
5. customers already have enough old images
129
« on: April 16, 2015, 05:14 »
i have low sales last two weeks, , but its getting better, this week could be better, we see how much od will be today
131
« on: April 14, 2015, 08:00 »
what a relief, yesterday 100% rejection got acceptance 100% with same images. -0.01 exposure.
i can breathe now.
132
« on: April 13, 2015, 08:52 »
motive or story of image, sorry english is not my first language.
for acceptance, that should at least be with face and very unique smile.
133
« on: April 13, 2015, 08:47 »
i always spend one hour for one photo, first make scene, shooting about half hour, editing,keywording goal is to earn 10$ with every image at least, in 80% im successful first time after one year i got reject 5/5 , all images was same aperture, same time, same work, they were office work, last 1000 was ok, not it is not anymore.
can i join to rejection club?
it is depressing, i spend 8 hours for this 5 images.
Hi, Cesar, You can join any "rejection club", but not mine.
My members can spent max 2-5 minutes for finishing each photo, which will then bring 30 cents...
8 hours for 5 photos?
Wow, this photos are good for Smithsonian Museum or some Modern art gallery,
but not for our 30 cents or one $ clubs.
 twice
134
« on: April 13, 2015, 08:16 »
first time after one year i got reject 5/5 , all images was same aperture, same time, same work, they were office work, last 1000 was ok, not it is not anymore.
can i join to rejection club?
it is depressing, i spend 8 hours for this 5 images.
135
« on: April 13, 2015, 03:01 »
noise, fringing, sharpness motiv is ok , but not for best work ever. you will be rejected. I would sort your portfolio a bit more.
This one is very good. Its fun, child, happy, movement, strong colors. (but maybe technical problems rejection  )
https://www.flickr.com/photos/candinamaria/16388970696/in/set-72157649489164293
This one (my opinion) is a reason for a rejection. Whats the story behind?
Is this a bad feeling? sad? I do not see fun, why is the background black? Is the child lonely?
The story is not 100%. It`s 50% happy and 50% sad. Confusing..
https://www.flickr.com/photos/candinamaria/16438965034/in/set-72157649489164293
136
« on: April 11, 2015, 09:06 »
a lot of noise , not enough detail I finally got my first bunch of crazy:
Focus--Subject is blurry, too soft, or out of focus when viewed at full resolution.
Noise--Image contains excessive noise, grain, artifacts and/or is poorly rasterized.
Here's a 100% crop of one of the centers where the center of focus is/should be:
http://www.seanlockephotography.com/images/examples/sampleFromBG.jpg
138
« on: March 28, 2015, 14:55 »
buy FF, buy canon 6d
139
« on: March 27, 2015, 14:18 »
anyone have today low sales?
140
« on: March 26, 2015, 14:19 »
in my stats on 123rf is image with zero download and zero money, what is that now?
another bad surprise?
141
« on: March 25, 2015, 07:05 »
i think he means mobile site for contributors, i have also problems sign in.
142
« on: March 18, 2015, 14:26 »
me too, 0.19$, are they joking? I've got one $0.19 [ ?!!!]
0.19?? If it continues like that we will have to give money together with our images
143
« on: March 16, 2015, 16:52 »
Thanks for the info. I must say I'm completely shocked that a reputable microstock agency would reject images that could make them a lot of money!
Fotolia is nor reputable, wrong word. i think u need diffrent expression.
144
« on: March 14, 2015, 16:30 »
image stucks when i select upload, it doesnt upload ( firefox )
in safari works, what i have to delete in browser so i can upload ?
145
« on: March 11, 2015, 14:13 »
sales are really strong on ss, they are 10% more then january, but sales are lower 10%-15% from thursday, today will be ok because of OD
i dont have huge sods whole february and march, 90$ SOD was 3 months ago.
subs are stronger and stronger on ss
146
« on: March 10, 2015, 15:12 »
$83,605,000 for 1000 contributors with year income 83.000$
65.000 contributors have ss?
147
« on: March 09, 2015, 07:39 »
yes it is nightmare, i also maid table with earnings, some sales come after month or two...
Disaster, you dont know what is sold on certain day or mounth, too many pages, SS is so much better.
148
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:07 »
i guarantee my rpd is correct, hard to believe in 40% range  All time RPD 53c, This year RPD 63c
Just to give another statistic
149
« on: March 08, 2015, 05:47 »
my rpd is 0.37, that is lower then subs on SS! 0.62 is misinformation No, no and no!, this is the worst agency , 90% is subs for 0.30$,10% is credit sales for 0.44$, never and never enterprise license, credit sale are rare like panda.
...
Well, I am not saying that I like DP. However, I don't like misinformation.
Here is RPD (return per download) from my portfolio: 0.62 at DP which is higher than FT (0.49), and almost the same as SS. For reference: 123RF 0.94, DT 1.44. This is just microstock ...
Otherwise, I agree. Do not upload to DP! Or even better. Do not upload to any other stock agency. We don't need more competition.
150
« on: March 07, 2015, 15:14 »
50$ on DP now or half year later 100$ all the time more on SS? stop upload to deposit. $ today, $ tomorrow...
Every 50$ payout is ok for me.
100% agree with dook.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
