151
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Exclusive vs Not
« on: June 15, 2018, 00:34 »
don't you mean contributing and getting competely ripped off vs not contributing
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Exclusive vs Not« on: June 15, 2018, 00:34 »
don't you mean contributing and getting competely ripped off vs not contributing
152
General Stock Discussion / Re: Earnings in the 800-1000$ month range, who makes it?« on: June 05, 2018, 09:38 »I can sometimes make $800-$1000 a (week)day with 10,000+ clips, but $200-$400 per day is more likely for me. I would describe posting one's financial results/ sales info for all to see 50% Ego boost 50% Stupidity 153
General Stock Discussion / Re: Earnings in the 800-1000$ month range, who makes it?« on: June 04, 2018, 08:36 »
It's not possible to make this sort of money from microstock. Some people will claim it is, however most contributors are earning less than $500 a month. At the very best it can earn you a few expenses. Definitely keep the day job and only do micro if you enjoy the hobby of shooting stock.
154
123RF / Re: Do you make $100/month at 123RF?« on: June 01, 2018, 06:20 »Thanks, actually just over $4000 on SS good months or $3000 up on bad. Never broken $5000 on SS. I don't think it'd take much encouragement to get Justanotherphotographer to share their portfolio. Anyone who is so willing to share their earnings info is doing so out of ego, otherwise they'd know better and protect their investment. Boasting of how much we make is just shooting yourself in the foot. There's a difference between encouraging other content creators with advice and ideas but sharing financial info serves little purpose. 155
Shutterstock.com / Re: Video sale for $1.50?« on: May 31, 2018, 09:56 »back in the 1990's, a video cost about $250 or more. photos cost $100.You make complete sense. It's time for 95% of us to move onwards and upwards to better things outside of the stock game. I blame the contributors who can't help themselves by posting about their sales and success, thereby encouraging the competition that will force many of them out. 156
Off Topic / Re: Emilia Clarke Tries Her Hand At Stock Photography« on: May 26, 2018, 04:44 »I think the point is "humor". People should give it a try. I did find it a little amusing but got the idea after 30 seconds. It wasn't particularly clever humour, and although a lot of business shots are cheesy, plenty of them are very slick and a fair amount of talent goes into creating them. I've never been interested in shooting business/medical subjects however I'd say these content creators and actors are just as professional as the people on the GOT set. Fame tends to blow things out of proportion. 157
General - Top Sites / Re: trying to figure out my pay for a 4K video clips on Getty says .71 cents« on: May 26, 2018, 01:54 »
are you going to continue uploading 4k there?
158
Off Topic / Re: Emilia Clarke Tries Her Hand At Stock Photography« on: May 26, 2018, 01:51 »
Mildly amusing. Apart from the obvious satire I'm not sure what the point is apart from belittling an industry she evidently sees as beneath her talent.
159
VideoBlocks / Re: 4K sales« on: May 24, 2018, 03:55 »
4K is a myth. 1080 shooting is the only way to go
160
General Photography Discussion / Re: Do you file taxes on your income from stock photography? (Honest)« on: May 22, 2018, 12:49 »
Yes f course I pay tax on my stock income. I don't want to pay thousands in penalties and/or go to prison
161
VideoBlocks / Re: I stopped uploading new material to Videoblocks till I see upswing in sales.« on: May 21, 2018, 22:16 »162
General Stock Discussion / Re: Agencies search engines - does time play a role?« on: May 20, 2018, 08:15 »
The cream always rises
163
VideoBlocks / Re: I stopped uploading new material to Videoblocks till I see upswing in sales.« on: May 20, 2018, 02:58 »
nobody makes any sales on VB/SBs
164
General Macrostock / Re: How to reach Getty with an urgent question?« on: May 14, 2018, 13:36 »It's not the case for exclusives.Shady Sue is right. It is the case for exclusives. I was with Getty for years until very recently and left for a few reasons. You can't use anything anywhere otherwise you'll risk having Getty send out one of their infamous legal extortion letters to the party who used the photo. If Getty knew you were distributing photos on the side that they have exclusivity to, they would not hesitate in terminating your agreement. 165
General Stock Discussion / Re: Eyeem & Twenty20 succes?« on: May 03, 2018, 14:44 »For those who are with these two agencies, have you had sales? If yes, how long are you with them? I just pulled out of Getty (RM macro) after many years. They still make some big sales but there are plenty of negatives that go with having your photos there. 166
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: April 21, 2018, 15:59 »Just sold a 4k video and I got $191.00 Excellent and by broadcasting this 1000 more videographers will begin uploading like crazy 167
Envato / Re: Envato - Set your own price« on: April 16, 2018, 20:53 »Envato are on the same level as 123RF and Motion Elements when it comes to video. Which means they are not competitive. Only Depositphotos and Alamy video could be worse. That's because they will be gutter feeding, accepting peanuts for their video sales. Selling video under US$20 net per sale is just not a viable business model, even for a sole operator with relatively small overheads. 168
Envato / Re: Envato - Set your own price« on: April 15, 2018, 20:50 »
Envato are on the same level as 123RF and Motion Elements when it comes to video. Which means they are not competitive. Only Depositphotos and Alamy video could be worse.
169
VideoBlocks / Re: Sales have peaked a little over a year ago on VideoBlocks.« on: April 13, 2018, 03:45 »
Since there are so many variables which combine to generate sales for a particular artist, it's highly subjective to try and determine whether or not sales have peaked or not.
These include; growth of your portfolio relative to growth of the entire collection, buyer trends, market ups and downs, etc etc. It's all about staying ahead of competitors, which is best done by finding niches, uploading quality marketable work and being early onto the game for new adaptations such as 4K was a few years ago. This is all obvious stuff and I suspect for some sellers at SB, sales are healthy. I'm slightly down on last year but there's plenty of time yet. 170
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 Survey: asking to donate money to support film makers« on: April 04, 2018, 16:18 »
Yep, I chose 'not interested' for that last question, would I be willing to help other film makers. Let them do it the hard way in the real world like the rest of us. It sorts out the dreamers from the persistent grafters.
171
General Stock Discussion / Re: Best-selling stock footage sites 2018 and your revenue?« on: March 29, 2018, 15:17 »
This is like giving away your trade secrets IMO. I encourage other videographers to get shooting, and am happy to offer tips. However I don't see any point in divulging information on my best selling clips, what niches I do well out of and my financial info. If I were to share this info it can just make it even harder to compete in an already very competitive market. Some info is just not worth sharing.
172
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock - Where are we going?« on: March 20, 2018, 14:03 »
I just did a quick image search of New Chums beach, New Zealand. The photos that come up with all due respect are an embarrassment. Surely no human can be doing QC because they have absolutely NCV and also no technical or creative merit. It SS were to cull the crap out of their system surely they'd go back to well below 100 million images. Are these agencies in a stupid race to one billion images? They're shooting themselves in the foot allowing amateur snappy snaps onto the site.
173
New Sites - General / Re: FiveDollarPhotos.com« on: March 18, 2018, 03:56 »
This charade will struggle to get off the ground. The website looks amateur at best, and let's face it, a stock library is defined by the quality of its website to a large extent
174
General Stock Discussion / Re: Instagram Still Usefull?« on: March 18, 2018, 03:51 »
Instagram is good for viewing an endless stream of exceptional photos if you follow the right people. For that reason I find it useful, it's inspirational
175
New Sites - General / Re: FiveDollarPhotos.com« on: March 10, 2018, 04:28 »
You could have teamed up with the infamous 'Dollar Photo Club', in only they weren't defunct.
|
|