MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - r2d2
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15
151
« on: February 15, 2016, 17:08 »
I realize Fotolia had many times shut down contributors over activity they weren't happy with - generally trying to improve terms for contributors. It is a huge surprise that a few duplicate images gets a whole portfolio shut down without warning.
Without more details, that seems to be a completely disproportionate reaction to a small and easily remedied infraction. Perhaps Mat could look into this and explain?
These types of random account closures should concern us all (not me directly as Fotolia refused to allow me to return - I asked) as people's livelihoods are just cut off with no explanation or recourse. It wasn't you this time, but with no process to protect contributors from arbitrary (as possibly just mistaken) actions, it could very well be next time.
And again we need "unity". A foundation with a fond to pay lawyers that enforce contributors interests.
152
« on: February 15, 2016, 08:05 »
The best unified solution that is slowly gaining traction (and would benefit everyone quicker if all the professional yet disgruntled contributors hopped on) is Symzio.
For the first time there is a real option here - so don't keep complaining unless you've done everything you can to free yourself from the yoke of agencies. You control most of your own pricing, control your entire collection, have two new independent platforms to sell your stuff, and most importantly, keep a minimum of 70% of all revenue up to 90%.
No one is going to hand you a solution - you need to work for it. No matter how many posts you put up, no matter how many angry retorts or insults you upvote, and no matter how many programs you opt out of, the only feasible way to create a noticeable impact is to compete.
And if Symzio is successful you're going to sell it to the highest bidder and then Symzio will be closed.
153
« on: February 15, 2016, 07:45 »
"No agency should get more than 50% commission and together we can enforce that."
if you knew how many times I said that, You would be amazed.
I would have expected nothing else from you! The agency commission will decline. Agencies are becoming less important in the future. It will be easier in the future to sell images without an agency. Today agencies grab the largest part of the cake. In the future sellers and buyers not put up with that longer. Agencies be replaced by search engines. I am convinced of that.
154
« on: February 15, 2016, 07:29 »
Maybe thats one reason. Another could be that the veterans still earn enough money. But whats your solution? Only cry a loud about the good old times?
"Only cry a loud about the good old times?" I am not crying about the old good times Not at all, never. But I am not whimpering about the new [bad] times, like many here.
I am aware that the system is not the best today (if any "best" system could exist), but we live longer, we live better (and we lament more and more).
The problem is not a problem of changing prices on Shutterstock's ELs This is a false problem, or only a very very little part of it. The problem is too complex to be limited only to Shutterstock's ELs. This is part of the result of how we have built our whole society. We are part of it, we are responsible of it. Constantly whining is just weakness and hypocrisy. The problem is a general problem of society. A society based on exploitation of the most for the profit of the less. The problem is a priority of values in life. (What is really important in life, what we really want in life?)
Money (and their possessors) rules the world, banks rule the world. All is done in the name of God Money If you really want to change things, change the system, the whole system There is could be a way: make the system to fail, theoretically it is very simple: make the banks fail and the whole system will collapse. Are you ready for this? How many people are ready for it? If you are, do it. If you are not you can continue to whimper, you will change nothing at all (and fill more depressed). But, in my opinion, this is another battle against windmills because you cannot fight and win against human nature (that is to be courageous in speech and coward in act).
there is some truth to it. Anyway, I'm not depressed and it is not all hopeless... Hey i feel good i like what i do! Just look at the share price Oringer is quite under pressure. The agency business collapses by itself. And if I can speed it up by talking about "unity"i do it. Thats it. No reason to throw the towel.
155
« on: February 14, 2016, 03:11 »
Maybe because we are older and have an greater experience of life than most of the people here [?]
Maybe thats one reason. Another could be that the veterans still earn enough money. But whats your solution? Only cry a loud about the good old times?
156
« on: February 14, 2016, 02:29 »
I'm bored of complaining, until we all get together and run our own site or buy a majority share in one of the sites, what can we do about it? Or we could all just use the few sites that pay 50% but that never happens. This is all our own fault, I'm sure we could be much better off but the vast majority of contributors still don't care.
CORRECT...The "VAST" majority. and I would be safe to say the "VAST" majority don't even know about the new License or care. Thats the sad part. Just us 50/100/200 that think were gonna change something. I don't think so guys. Opt out of everything. they don't care.
+1
I have told this many times, but here some people think that they are the center of the world and that everything they say or think is holy word
Ok and whats your solution now? Every good thing starts with an idea. So talking about an alternative marketing channel is a good thing. Because it is the first step on a long way. But it is the firs step! Why are you and Rinder so demotivating?
157
« on: February 12, 2016, 03:39 »
We are trying to explain things with transparency and sincerity, but some words are misinterpreted. The phrase about lawyers referred to specific allegations that a user of the forum has made falsely (we have been accused of copies even in cases where the authors had uploaded them to Freepik).
But we are here to talk with you. We just wanted to personally respond to comments, to meet you, to know how could we collaborate. We have addressed all claims of this user, we have offered her to talk via Hangout or Skype, etc.
Your businessmodel destroys my income. Do you think contrubutors can not calculate or what else is the reason for your audacity?
158
« on: February 07, 2016, 17:56 »
Hello again everyone,
Justanotherphotographer, we do not do this anymore. However, there are resources that are still indexed, like the examples that you have indicated and we have already erased.
We take seriously every copyright infringement and we invest a lot of money in creating our own content. Therefore, whenever we detect plagiarism, we take measures immediatly removing the content and correcting our working methods, but it is inevitable that some case go unnoticed.
Shelma, I can ensure you that we never ask for replicas from Shutterstock and whenever we have detected a plagiarism of any sort, we have immediately terminated the contract with the designer as we do not tolerate these actions. We work with many authors and one of our core values is to respect the work of designers. Those working exclusively for us know how we are react in terms of copies.
As for the contributors, there are more and more people interested in our system. Having your illustrations in Freepik doesnt mean that the sales of your images in other banks decrease but, in fact, it is a way to monetize files for which a designer was no longer generating any income in other platforms. Designers like you have tried it and they are very satisfied.
Really, we'd love to have your collaboration. We would like you to give us a chance, get to know us, as now you know how much we strive to make your work be respected by others.
We pay to all contributors $5 for every 1000 downloads. We know that this is a new business model, but It's just another way to earn money with your illustrations and you can try it when you want (Please mail us to marketing(at)freepik.com)
And the most important. We want that you know that we take seriously every copyright infringement. Therefore, whenever we detect plagiarism, we take measures immediatly removing the content and correcting our working methods, but it is inevitable that some case go unnoticed. This happens in all banks and, in fact, we sometimes are also victims of plagiarism.
Shelma, if you need we can talk by Hangout or Skype but, if not, we will leave this matter to our lawyers, because publishing false accusations is an illegal act.
Thanks so much and we keep in touch for everything you need
Sorry. Are you kidding me? I think we should donate/collect for a good lawyer. Lets stand together this kind of "business behavior" is in my opinion harmful for every contributor.
159
« on: February 06, 2016, 16:41 »
Yes Paypal or in your case Skrill is the bad guy. With Paypal you can create an $ account then you have dollars in your account without automatic changing to your local curency. But the change rates at PP are always bad and they have a fee for changing.
160
« on: February 03, 2016, 17:38 »
who writes these stupid announcements? 10 percent the crooks.
They (another example is ss) think we are idiots we are just cashcows for them.
161
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:58 »
tried/suggested a million times, will never happen
Why it will never happen? it will happen when the race to to the bottom is painful enough its a question of time.
15% with istock isn't painful enough, I dread to think what will be, maybe when we have to start paying the sites for the privilege of selling our images?
apparently not. Seems that the major contributors still live well
162
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:37 »
unless you get 30% of the contributors on board including some top contributors, we will not make a difference. thats not being negative, thats being realistic. the factories wont join in, they have a responsibility to pay people on their payroll. we have also seen when yuri left, taking 110k images and millions in dollars, ss just let him go without blinking. why do you think ss limited the amount of images you can delete at 1 time? because theyve learned from istock dday and the dpc revolt. they knew al along they were going to cut royalties, and more will come. we will see a drop in royalties until this business becomes unsustainable for the amateurs. and only then, when the microstock business defaults, we will see a change. but that will be a long way from now, look at getty, they keep dragging themselves along when they have been broke for years now. the bubble will burst, but dont hold your breath
You are right a long time... If there are agencie splits of 70% and more there is enough money in the business. Its time for agencie comission cut. Lets annoy shareholders ...
163
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:11 »
tried/suggested a million times, will never happen
Why it will never happen? it will happen when the race to to the bottom is painful enough its a question of time.
164
« on: February 03, 2016, 04:02 »
There always have been and always will be a certain percentage of people who don't care, can't be bothered, think nothing can make a difference, cross picket lines, etc.
Yet unions do form and people do protest and change does happen.
I'm all for unions. They are effective if you can get the majority of workers to join, pay dues, and support collective bargaining. Do we have a union representing us? Negotiating with top management on our behalf? Where do I send my dues payment?
No?? Then this is just another shitstorm (good word Elena).
Yes we need a union to force our interests. We should form a club with a small membership fee. Once in a year we can vote for what the membership fee should used (maybe an action or create an best agencie award etc.). Thats could be a beginning of a unity...
165
« on: January 29, 2016, 16:24 »
The russian microstock forum microstock.ru has begun keep track of the new EL downloads based on sales price point and country of sale origin.
You can see the translated discussion text, spreadsheets and graphs here.
http://tinyurl.com/hen75yz
As per Shutterstock Paul Brennan:"To help simplify the earnings schedule, your enhanced license payout will now be determined by your earnings tier."
Yeah, these tables and graphs look really SIMPLIFIED compared to the original 28 dollars per EL
Looks like Paul is thinking that contributors are stupid. "We are partners..." bla bla...
166
« on: January 29, 2016, 02:26 »
Yes we need a nice shitstorm via socialmedia in the meantime we can click SS Google Adwords advertising away...
167
« on: January 28, 2016, 16:24 »
Opt out. I think we need more public relations. The buyers should know that SS is taking more from us without giving somthing to the buyers.
168
« on: January 26, 2016, 09:54 »
We are an intelligent bunch of people, it would not take much to setup a dedicated independent central body we all subscribe to that looks after our rights and acts as a central go between, between contributors and resellers.
Microstockgroup is half way there is terms of popular and independent.
Another poll, would you pay $10 a year to subscribe to a independent agency that looks after the rights on microstock contributors?
10k people join = $100,000 revenue to run it. Its pretty simple stuff. 100k people join = 1m a year to run it that's 100k people with one voice, that's powerful.
Its time for somthing like that maybe a good Kickstarter project. But the CEO of this project can not be contributor of any other agency cause the big 3 will not longer work with him.
169
« on: January 23, 2016, 02:41 »
In longterm view the next who will go is Shutterstock
170
« on: January 22, 2016, 17:42 »
Normaly the bad news came in autum now the agencies try to screw us at new year.
171
« on: January 22, 2016, 17:38 »
I got a private message from Leo. He's still maintaining grfx but at a different location.
Chaos again but its normal for this developer...
172
« on: January 14, 2016, 22:35 »
I, I will be king And you, you will be queen Though nothing will drive them away We can beat them just for one day We can be heroes just for one day Thank you for this Mr. Bowie you are one of my heroes. RIP
173
« on: December 20, 2015, 16:35 »
It's not really a competition because these tools serve completely different purposes. StockSubmitter focuses on full submission automation
And this works with all agencies? I found Xpiks sounds nice and its free i will give it a try!
174
« on: December 18, 2015, 04:42 »
Envato is responsible for determining, collecting and remitting VAT for all Envato Market purchases from EU buyers.
Envato will report the VAT collection and remittance to the relevant EU member state authorities using our EU MOSS VAT registration.
sounds good but then:
For clarity, EU VAT is not reported in the authors name, and we do not require author VAT registration numbers or details. From: https://help.market.envato.com/hc/en-us/articles/204416900?_ga=1.81029911.1024980761.1450428179
I dont know if it is possible/legal and the contributor not having to pay more VAT in his own name. What do youb think is that legal for european contributors?
So all of this would affect me only if the contract was a direct contract between me and the end customer. For example, when I sell things on Ebay, they are just offering the platform but the sale is still between me and the customer. So I have to care about VAT requirements.
Please read carefully! The contract at Envato is direct between buyer and contributor. Thats the difference to Shutterstock, FT, Istock etc. who act as an agencie. Envato claim to be only a platform/marketplace.
175
« on: December 18, 2015, 04:06 »
Envato is responsible for determining, collecting and remitting VAT for all Envato Market purchases from EU buyers. Envato will report the VAT collection and remittance to the relevant EU member state authorities using our EU MOSS VAT registration.
sounds good but then: For clarity, EU VAT is not reported in the authors name, and we do not require author VAT registration numbers or details. From: https://help.market.envato.com/hc/en-us/articles/204416900?_ga=1.81029911.1024980761.1450428179I dont know if it is possible/legal and the contributor not having to pay more VAT in his own name. What do youb think is that legal for european contributors?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|