|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Microstockphoto
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 49
26
« on: July 26, 2021, 08:47 »
i spoke to them, seem genuine, but whatever, everybody has made their mind up on the back of a russian youtube video, lol
Didnt they also tell you that they had no connection to Freepik, which they clearly do (founded by one of the main guys at Freepik and have Freepik associates giving the only endorsements)?
My assessment isnt to do with the video (aside from that helping expose the connections to the Freepik ambassadors). A 2 minute look at their website should have alarm bells ringing for anyone.
i said they had nothing to do with freepik, in other words, your images do not go up on freepik and they are not looking to give your images away for free. what they do is, look at agencies where you are NOT selling yet and add your images to their portfolio for that agency and you get paid for sales. of course with a middle man you get less than selling direct, but if your images are not with an agency you make nothing. , anyway, i think they are legit, just dont want to handover my personal data to them in light of the recent events at 123,
27
« on: July 25, 2021, 17:17 »
If you are interested to increase your incomes
Do you have a guarantee on that?
oh come off it, no agency guarantees anything, so why would you look for guarantes from them, you've been shafted at istock and alamy a zillion times, you're still with them
28
« on: July 25, 2021, 17:13 »
i spoke to them, seem genuine, but whatever, everybody has made their mind up on the back of a russian youtube video, lol
29
« on: July 21, 2021, 02:47 »
people do love to moan dont they, i think for once it is a bit of good news
30
« on: July 21, 2021, 02:46 »
potato potato, insinuation then without any backing
31
« on: July 20, 2021, 11:46 »
found a video by a russian guy on youtube saying that it's a scam. Can't understand a word he's saying but you can see from the email texts in the video he has tried to correspond with Vecpho - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImfMzF5UDKI
Think my suspicion was 100% correct
this was debunked, as that particular artist had unreasonable demands for committing his portfolio, and when they refused he started a slander campaign,
32
« on: July 20, 2021, 11:45 »
Humm VECPHO ? Vector soup? 🤔
Sounds Vietnamese?
they are based in spain
34
« on: July 20, 2021, 11:44 »
Hi! I am Alvaro, Director of Vecpho.
Vecpho is an agency of Microstock representation. We are not fraude or scam.
We are open to work with you if you are interested!
Visit our website: vecpho.com
Well, there you go. Nice, honest people. Not a fraude. *snork*
where is your proof they are a fraud? come on then, dont accuse people whithout backing otherwise its slander
35
« on: July 16, 2021, 04:07 »
great thanks
37
« on: July 13, 2021, 05:34 »
"Ok, so just to clarify, based on what you've told us... your account was actually closed because you have eight different accounts, have been buying your own content, have moved countries 20 times in the last year, you got a bunch of DMCA requests on your content, you now live in North Korea, you have 50 other people with SS accounts using your laptop to log in, you have an approval rating of less than 0.1%, your content is made up of blurred stills from ramdon videos that you found off the internet, and you specifically asked for your account to be closed?"
"Yeah, that's right"
Exactly! 
you just follow the masses
38
« on: July 13, 2021, 05:33 »
stock photographers acting like fbi agents, 'there is more to the story here', dissecting every word, never seen a more distrusting bunch of people than on photography forums, and ganging up on people as well, why is it that stock photographers have such crappy personalities..
,
pfft
It's usually because when somebody says something along the lines of 'my account has been closed for no reason', aside from a few very rare exceptions.... there is always, usually without fail, almost every single time... a reason. A reason which only becomes apparent later in the thread when information is provided that wasn't initially. So while it would be nice to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and go with the premise that there actually is 'no reason' it usually saves a bit of time to question what they're saying.
A random example for you...
"My account was closed for no reason"
100 questions and replies later...
"Ok, so just to clarify, based on what you've told us... your account was actually closed because you have eight different accounts, have been buying your own content, have moved countries 20 times in the last year, you got a bunch of DMCA requests on your content, you now live in North Korea, you have 50 other people with SS accounts using your laptop to log in, you have an approval rating of less than 0.1%, your content is made up of blurred stills from ramdon videos that you found off the internet, and you specifically asked for your account to be closed?"
"Yeah, that's right"
but that isnt the case here though, the account was closed due to an error, yet here you are thinking something MUST be wrong with the OPs story, the mistrust is obvious. it has to be the photographers fault, cant be the agency
39
« on: July 12, 2021, 18:41 »
i had this negative amount happening to me., saying their support is nonexistent is an understatement,
40
« on: July 12, 2021, 18:38 »
stock photographers acting like fbi agents, 'there is more to the story here', dissecting every word, never seen a more distrusting bunch of people than on photography forums, and ganging up on people as well, why is it that stock photographers have such crappy personalities..
,
pfft
41
« on: June 29, 2021, 16:41 »
do i need to delete content from ss when submitting to ws? or do they weed out the duplicates?
42
« on: June 29, 2021, 16:35 »
better security could mean slower speeds, and that make sense if you think about it
43
« on: June 29, 2021, 16:33 »
That's really horrible, more humiliating than to be a slave.
oh behave will you. what a really dumb comment that is
44
« on: June 08, 2021, 17:27 »
45
« on: June 06, 2021, 18:14 »
How about Adobe provides a list of supported FTP clients, at least for Mac & Windows, although possibly there may be some Linux users out there?
Rather than have contributors guess, have a list of software and when changes are made the Adobe end, test against those to make sure they work.
Meantime I can upload via the web
stop talking sense
46
« on: May 26, 2021, 04:58 »
my size theory is not it, i tested it
could it be that he uploads an image and then have bots click on the image and maybe download a few from a buyer account to propel them to teh first spot??,
48
« on: May 03, 2021, 13:20 »
check out the sizes of this photos, he has the largest resolution for most photos in any search, tree 7157 4774px, beach 6000x4000px but the rest is smaller. i believe shutterstock favours bigger larger resolution. i think one of their blogs says to submit the largest resolution possible. not sure if thats why, but could be one of the reasons.
49
« on: April 20, 2021, 07:58 »
i have to apologise, i do have sub sales, i didnt realise they were calculated after the month, i do get between $20-$60 sub sales per month
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 49
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
