MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - diego_cervo
101
« on: February 28, 2008, 02:45 »
I was wandering what would happen if microstocks would start trading in Euros instead of dollars, since nobody can see the end of the US dollar falling? Actually, this is what lots of companies involved in international business are starting to do.
Do you guys think it may change something from the buyer side? I believe that buyers would still stick to microstocks as prices for RF would be the cheapest. In the meanwhile both contributors and agencies would get a considerable boost in revenues.
Best regards, Diego
102
« on: February 24, 2008, 17:53 »
1078 + 21914
new total = 22,992
103
« on: December 20, 2007, 04:55 »
thanks for the advise Diego
104
« on: December 20, 2007, 04:54 »
mine too....wow! i just requested another payment...hope it will be processed in 3 days as usual Merry Xmas to all you guys, Diego
105
« on: December 13, 2007, 07:51 »
I think that agencies should do like Apple with itunes, i.e. implementing a number of stores according to the country where buyers live. This means that european customers will buy in the european store (in euros), Americans in the US store (in dollars), and so on. Same price but different currencies.... what you think?
Regards, Diego
Fotolia is doing that allready
In Germany: http://de.fotolia.com/ and in England: http://en.fotolia.com/
They charge customers in Euro's or in pounds and we get paid in Dollars
Don't like that at all.
you right. However, when a buyer spends 1 for a small web res licence, I still get 0,37$ instead of 0,37 or 0,54$!!!! Therefore buyers spend more, agencies earn more, photographers earn less!! Regards, Diego
106
« on: December 12, 2007, 18:30 »
I think that agencies should do like Apple with itunes, i.e. implementing a number of stores according to the country where buyers live. This means that european customers will buy in the european store (in euros), Americans in the US store (in dollars), and so on. Same price but different currencies.... what you think?
Regards, Diego
107
« on: November 13, 2007, 09:43 »
Leaf is right. Exclusive relationships don't pay as much as having multiple channels to promote your work. Have a look at this article titled "Learning From the Masters" on http://www.microstockdiaries.com/According to Jack Hollingsworth (one of the most famous stock photographer), a tiny percentage of buyers cares about exclusivity. This means that contributing to just 1 agency will not affect your sales. Best wishes, diego
108
« on: November 12, 2007, 13:15 »
yeah, but Moodboard sold a normal RF (i.e. NON exclusive) licence.
110
« on: November 05, 2007, 09:37 »
I tried everything (including removing spaces or using ";" instead of commas) but nothing works there!! Diego
111
« on: November 01, 2007, 08:45 »
I believe it's a good thing as well. We all may benefit from it as SS may attract new buyers.
114
« on: October 26, 2007, 10:15 »
right! views are not that many. However sales are slightly increasing. hope they'll start marketing soon!
115
« on: October 16, 2007, 03:11 »
i tried both lightroom and aperture, then I bought lightroom. It's simpler and (more important) faster. diego
116
« on: October 15, 2007, 15:30 »
finally we got decent stats!! thanks Josh. You guys from Crestock did a very good job. diego
117
« on: October 12, 2007, 04:04 »
hey jean, i think you should add watermarks to the images in your galleries diego
118
« on: October 03, 2007, 04:12 »
Did some of you guys submit images to moodboard? Any feedback?
119
« on: October 03, 2007, 03:28 »
I agree with you karimala. Even if I'm not so concerned about subscription, I still think 25cents commission is too low, unless StockXpert is planning to raise it depending on photographers sales or some other criteria like SS does.
120
« on: September 28, 2007, 07:59 »
finally I had 2 sales on SV this week. ALLELUJA!! I set 10$ as the default price...it seems to me to be enough fair, since the same photos are on the Big 6. Don't you? diego
121
« on: September 27, 2007, 03:44 »
no comment!! I never saw something like that before
122
« on: September 14, 2007, 05:26 »
btw, did anyone of you guys had any sale on snapvillage? I sumbitted around 50 photos in june, setting low prices...but still nothing.
123
« on: September 08, 2007, 06:14 »
actually my grandpa was a colorist in the early '900.
124
« on: September 07, 2007, 03:41 »
great yuri!
125
« on: August 15, 2007, 19:48 »
...i don't know...maybe subscription will not affect our revenues from per-photo sales. After all, a very few of my sales on DT come from subscriptions.
diego
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|