51
Shutterstock.com / Re: Are the reviewers sniffing glue over there?
« on: March 27, 2020, 18:49 »
just resubmit and they ll get pass.its not humans its the INFAMOUS AI
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 51
Shutterstock.com / Re: Are the reviewers sniffing glue over there?« on: March 27, 2020, 18:49 »
just resubmit and they ll get pass.its not humans its the INFAMOUS AI
52
Shutterstock.com / Re: $1.50 for a video clip???« on: March 21, 2020, 19:02 »
and to top it of they reject videos of good quality for the moronic reason of noise .i bought the app neat video for premiere pro and i tested it and trust me once you use it you cant find one single piece of noise in the video
so what the heck are they seeing?? but yea its not humans its the bloody AI 53
General Stock Discussion / Re: Best sites for selling editorial images« on: March 03, 2020, 18:51 »
the best out there is shutterstock even though lately they are on a big or lets say huge rejection roll .their AI likes to reject a lot
then dreamstime its a low earner but i had sales on some celebs pics i got and istock does editorial.but its limited .you cant post some certain images as editorial cause they are scared of copyright and then we have the others canstock bigstock and 123rf 54
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone have any experience starting a youtube channel?« on: February 19, 2020, 19:05 »
if you want to be successful on yt buy a go pro 4k travel round the world and act like an idiot or casey nastand in front of your gopro camera and the numbers will come eventually
also i agree the relaxation clips help a lot and the unboxing videos i personally liked the videos he made they can be relaxing and you see beautiful places but unfo the majority of people in planet earth want to see stories and people like casey and pwesomethin lol 55
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Footage Rejections« on: January 16, 2020, 19:03 »
i ve heard in the past that people who resubmited their content for second and third time got warnings from ss for ban.isnt that risky??? i agree maybe some cases the reviewers are right cause in the end of the day the photographers make mistakes too as much as experienced they are,but in most of the cases the rejections have nothing to do with technical problems Just an AI doesnt know what its accepting or rejecting or reviewers who like to reject just to earn more money
56
General Stock Discussion / Re: Exerience of these five agencies..........« on: December 19, 2019, 18:27 »
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYBODY AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR AND HAPPY SALES
i just needed to say somethin to this dumb thread 57
General Stock Discussion / Re: Any sales at Picfair?« on: November 30, 2019, 19:41 »Better to get one image accepted and one rejected in Adobe with one sale instead two accepted with no sales in Picfair. I like the site, but we are here to make a business.i agree with you but on the other hand, look at the ss thread what is going on and at the ss forums.many want to quit submit images cause of rejections and the moronic rejection reason.and also that sale you say its 24 p or 37 p compare to 20 pounds or dollars or 10 pounds now this guy said that he earned and i said ITS ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE.i am not saying quit adobe and ss and post in picfair only 58
General Stock Discussion / Re: Any sales at Picfair?« on: November 29, 2019, 19:19 »
still the best part of this site is the no reviews.i know this can be a not good thing sometimes but when ss acting like crazy lately with rejections,and on adobe i got a rejection the other day of a silver watch in a red background and the reason was out of focus DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.then for me it still is a good alternative
59
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock reviewers are idiots« on: November 18, 2019, 19:11 »
i wanna barge in at the ss offices and destroy that machine into tiny pieces go and reject me if you can
60
General Macrostock / Re: Anyone on Agefotostock?« on: October 30, 2019, 10:12 »
hi is this agency only for us contributors? they give you some contract to sign and send it but they ask the adress you live in only not the country like other agencies.and do you have to send them a set of 10 images for eg as a test like on ss to accept you?
are they difficult with acceptance? 61
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock reviewers are idiots« on: October 14, 2019, 18:21 »
you can shout, get ungry, upset, cursing all you want but in the end of the day there is nothing you can do about it.just submit new content and dont let it bother you.if they accept it FINE if not THEIR LOSS their site their rules.at site.
My only guess is that these people who review the photos they are lookin at the photos theme. some bored reviewer hating his life and job and wanna shoot himshelf for scrolling thousant of images and his head starts to go loco and says nope nope nope nope ye em nope nope or some reviewer with no experience in photography Nope nope nope ye emm NOPE nope noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooope or some 18 reviewer who likes trolling nOPE NOPE NOPE ye NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPE nope no NO WAY HOSE 62
General Stock Discussion / Re: What's happening with Yuri Acrus?« on: September 09, 2019, 18:07 »
he is alive and well in his big house in malibu looking at this forum and prob laughing at you drinking a glass of whiskey
63
New Sites - General / Re: EyeEM Earnings« on: August 23, 2019, 17:22 »
thats nothing.another user sold a photo of a beautiful girl for 0.03 plus taxes lol
64
General Stock Discussion / Re: timelapses from pentax camera« on: July 07, 2019, 18:02 »
ok thank you i will do it in the traditional way with lr etc and leave the auto timelapses for youtube or insta.
iphone has a built in timelapse and the stock sites accept the iphone vids thats why i was wondering about the pentax camera. 65
General Stock Discussion / timelapses from pentax camera« on: July 07, 2019, 09:08 »
hi few months ago i bought the pentax ks2 which has a built in timelapse and it does the job automatically.it makes a timelapse video in 2 words, i dont need an intervalometer for eg.or to ad the photos in lr and make a timelapse.there. i created some nice timelapses and i have the adobe premiere.so my question is
do i need to edit my timelapses on adobe to send them to stock sites <pond five in the one i wanna send them> or send them without post editing?i am new to the whole video thing so i am not sure what the reviewers are lookin in timelapses videos apart from noise or artifacts.does anyone have a pentax camera and did you send the timelapses videos straight from the box without edit? 67
General Stock Discussion / Re: Canstock rejects almost everything )Photos)« on: June 18, 2019, 18:13 »
i remember when i first send to them a bunch of photos to pass the test lol they aproved me as a contrubutor then i send the same approved picture and they rejected it for beeing too soft somethin like that. and now 4 years later this image the same image sold 2 times on twenty20 go figure
68
New Sites - General / Re: Exciting news! - new site ExcitingStock.com« on: May 14, 2019, 18:26 »As a buyer, I am happy to go to ExcitingStock for all my unusually sized artboard vectors and blurry photos of dead flowers. They have everything I need, including out of focus ducks!i have pleanty of them.i mean out of focus ducks.now i know where to send the ducks 69
General Stock Discussion / Re: Twenty20 tax update« on: May 02, 2019, 18:33 »
i just received a mail that i needed to comfirm my personal info to them give my full name and home address.has anyone else got this mail from twenty20? sorry but there are many scams out there thats why i am asking
70
General Stock Discussion / Re: Mostphotos--Is it working.« on: April 28, 2019, 18:30 »unfo mine portfolio GONE 2 i can see the number of images i have and the likes in each image but when i click on my page it says server error somethin like that 71
General Stock Discussion / Re: Mostphotos--Is it working.« on: April 28, 2019, 18:29 »
unfo mine portfolio i can see the number of images i have and the likes in each image but when i click on my page it says server error somethin like that
WHERE ARE MY PICTURES??? 72
General Stock Discussion / Re: Twenty20« on: April 26, 2019, 17:45 »
so if i now keep using twenty20 the images that i upload them i cant put them anywhere else?
73
General Stock Discussion / UFOS on stock???« on: April 19, 2019, 08:57 »
ok this is is gonna sound super moronic but do you have pics of ufos in stock sites??? i mean if you do they go as editorial? LOL i doupt you can get model release from alf lol
i have a picture of a Big ufo over new york.ofcourse is photoshoped but can i post it on adobe for instance? 74
Selling Stock Direct / Re: Someone has sold any image in Picfair ?« on: March 24, 2019, 18:57 »i was just saying that is another option and if you get a sale you wont get 25 p or 38 p or whatever p lolAlso like in FAA you dont have to sell your pictures for pennies like in stock sites.so that is a must regardless of low or zero salesBecause zero sales of files of $XXX is better than 1000 sales of $X. the no rejections and the set up your own price that may attract some users out there.like i said i dont have sales on picfair so i dont care anymore. 75
Selling Stock Direct / Re: Someone has sold any image in Picfair ?« on: March 23, 2019, 18:47 »
i have zero sales too for 2 years now .i tweeted my portfolio many times on twitter and i got some likes and last night a follow from picfair lol but unfo its been dead for me .and i didnt even bother to check it for few months now.last night was the only time i uploaded something after a while .
The only good thing about picfair and mostphotos is the no rejection thing yes it can be a bad thing some times when the site is flooded with crappy photos,but its easy to upload set the price and hit the button and wait.you dont need to wait for aproval or rejections for silly tecnical problems.The site is just another solution to storage somewhere your photos and sell them. Also like in FAA you dont have to sell your pictures for pennies like in stock sites.so that is a must regardless of low or zero sales |
|