MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hellou

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
76
I think its completely legal and ok. Why would the company need to buy a extended licence? But who knows :)

79
Dreamstime.com / Re: New Tax Forms
« on: December 08, 2016, 09:59 »
....and submit a driver's license, passport, etc but don't include a photo???
Looks strange.
"Security measure for Tax Forms: please upload a copy of any ID document with photo (e.g: identity card, passport, driver's licence, etc). Note: this should not be a photo of yourself"

Should I upload an ID with a photo of some one else ??
rofl you both..  ;D You joking or?
Do not upload ONLY a photo of yourself.

80
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Gears on unfinished page
« on: November 06, 2016, 08:18 »
-

81
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock Royalty Change
« on: October 25, 2016, 12:19 »
I don`t care about istock. Hope they die soon.

83
 ??? hosted here: ... db-s13-storage-public.designbold.com ...

At the moment your website gives no feedback to 123rf website. So we (the photographers) do not earn a single cent while you sell a template with our images. Iam realy confused why you should even be allowed to use a extended license. I thought digital reproductions are not allowed.

Your website is searching first at selfhosted images (  >:( our iamges from 123rf only by regular licence). This is not ok for regular licence.
After this it will search on 123rf too. This is ok for regular licence.

For your self hosted images you need a extended license.
You can not buy the 123rf images once and resell it as templates and only pay a regular low price only one time. NO WAY!

I do not think the photograper is happy you resell his image:
https://de.dreamstime.com/stockfoto-blondes-mdchen-der-mode-im-modischen-jeansmantel-image51865059
https://www.designbold.com/templates/qv4wxQGv2p/sale-off-up-to-40-graphic-resources.html


84
On checking out the website my initial thought is that you need to pay a few hundred dollars to get a proof reader as there are quite a few errors, like it has been written by a non native English speaker.

Where are you licensing the images currently featured on your templates?
123rf

85
The only reason i see for the extended license is that you host the images on your own hosting. Yes it is right, you want sell a template and you need a extended license.
Solution:
If you act like a affiliate/ refferral partner all images stay at the stock photo agency.  There are endless reseller.  Poster and printing services for example.
They do not pay a extended license becaue they act as a reseller.

A second solution could be to accept people as seller. Invite photographers to upload directly some choosen photos and graphics. Pay more as all the stock photo sites. Make a good offer for photographers and you save money because you only pay for sold template.

Choose some of my graphics and i will upload them. Give me $2 each time a image will be used on a template. Iam in.

86
Why an extended license? Use a API and pay a regular license per single use.

89
It is normal that my images still appear in search results ??

 >:(
And still online on their partner sites.  >:(

90
DepositPhotos / Re: New DollarPhotoClub?
« on: September 29, 2016, 06:39 »
You have to count deactivated + deleted images.
Many deleted images are still online. Hostiles..  :o
There are no deleted ones, only deactivated. For contributors it is impossible to delete files.

Send a delete request.

91
DepositPhotos / Re: New DollarPhotoClub?
« on: September 29, 2016, 04:44 »
You have to count deactivated + deleted images.
Many deleted images are still online. Hostiles..  :o

92
DepositPhotos / Re: New DollarPhotoClub?
« on: September 28, 2016, 06:55 »
Nice (not).
Account deleted from deposit support. All images still online. Not a single word about my earnings / payment.

93
DepositPhotos / Re: New DollarPhotoClub?
« on: September 22, 2016, 00:43 »
DepositPhotos promoting "New Flexible Plan". May be that is not news. But I've just noticed. Monthly plan 10$ for 10 images and you can buy additional images for 1$ and unused downloads transfer month to month >:(
Sound familiar?


Grumble, it looks like it worked. I see higher prices. Anyone else see a change?


you kidding? it`s same same

94
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia offline/slow approvals
« on: September 22, 2016, 00:36 »
Reviev time is totaly different , sometimes is a day, sometimes, 2, sometimes 5. Sometimes I upload 10 files, 3 get reviewed the next day, the rest 3 days later, so, there is no "formula" how soon images are reviewed.
dumc you are 6 years too late

95
New Sites - General / Re: New Micro site, tell me what you think!
« on: September 22, 2016, 00:08 »
This doorknocking sounds a bit old fashioned. And it sounds like some kind of pyramid scheme where the whole goal is to be getting this 10% rather than actually building a viable site and selling stock.

And what would be these virtues that we're giving the speil about, you seem to have brushed over that part? Is it just the 10% part, or are there other virtues? There are lots of other sites that have referral programs, maybe not lifetime, but what else do you have to offer... 10% for life is great, but 10% of not much is... well, not much.
::) 2007..

96
DepositPhotos / Re: New DollarPhotoClub?
« on: September 21, 2016, 05:26 »
deleted files. too stupid prices
You can't delete your files on DP!  :D
What are you talking? click "Deactivate". Done.

97
DepositPhotos / Re: New DollarPhotoClub?
« on: September 20, 2016, 23:16 »
deleted files. too stupid prices

98
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IStock 2048x1365 image preview
« on: September 13, 2016, 14:37 »
I wonder what you mean here. I just checked a comp image and the image on the page and i see watermarks. I must be misunderstanding something.
https://us.fotolia.com/id/87277466
edit: do you mean on the thumbnails? that's the only place I don't see any watermark. And those are less than about 2" wide at 72ppi. I guess they could be used for something, but...

 ::)
Check your image size at FT. Size "for free": 360px 240px. OK.
https://t3.ftcdn.net/jpg/00/87/27/74/240_F_87277466_049MrAD726hRXU0NCAZG6k05R7iFPMfG.jpg
Now check the size customers use your images. I can see 7 images at the first 3 pages. Size around 360px.
Drag and drop your image here https://www.google.com/imghp

99
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IStock 2048x1365 image preview
« on: September 13, 2016, 12:11 »
Preview images are watermarked. What do you mean? It`s fine for me.

It depends on the image. The watermark hardly shows at all on light-coloured images or isolations.
Yes, you are right. On a few isolated images of mine. Not many.
The worst still FT. No watermark for all images. Perfect size for many many needs and no watermark. Horrible.
I think we will see a hard decrease in sales for "size XS" at FT. No one needs to buy this size any more.

100
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IStock 2048x1365 image preview
« on: September 13, 2016, 11:27 »
Preview images are watermarked. What do you mean? It`s fine for me.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors