Then people would just not mention the artist name in the title - They'd still use it for promting. Same difference.

Exactly, they will acknowledge that it�s wrong to use those names in titles and tags but won�t acknowledge that is wrong to copy all those artists.

People are uploading AI images on Adobe with the names of the artists they copied included in the title...

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7196699137025845&set=a.1171422066220279
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=844099017274867&set=pcb.844099057274863

Isn't this bad for Adobe, they will have less relevant time specific content.

But it says 'The companies asked a San Francisco federal court to dismiss the artists' proposed class action lawsuit'
Isn't the court supposed to decide whether to dismiss it or not.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-companies-ask-us-court-dismiss-artists-copyright-lawsuit-2023-04-19/

The Ai-generated  images sell pretty well,  but not by themselves.
My best seller has been download at Adobe 52 times - but as all my AI images it went through a careful postprocessing in Photoshop and other dedicated software. Not only to remove the obvious errors (too many fingers, missing eyes etc.) but also to give them a particular light and style - they must reflect the way I feel, not MidJourney.
Also devising the right prompt is no kid's play: the AI is still too primitive to guess accurately enough what one has in mind upon a few words.
Last but definitely not least, the human creativity lies in the idea behind the prompt - mediocre prompt, mediocre outcomes. I've been waiting long for someone to mention this here, but so far in vain...

I don't see anything special looking at the prompts on the Midjourney community showcase site, unlike the results. Not to mention that many of the prompts include artists' names.

My September earnings are about half of September 2021

But have you checked your portfolio on their site. I also thought mine are gone by looking at the content manager but they are up for sale on the main site.

It looks like this agency is in its death throes.

Anyway I went and checked my 40+ images I deleted and they have indeed gone. My tiny port wasn't a concern to 123rf. Maybe since then the agency has put blocks to stop contributors from deleting their works.

This is an interesting watch on how this plays out. Anyone like some 🍿 ?  Plenty to go round. 🍿 🍿 🍿

When did you delete your images. Mine are still up and it seems they are not going to reply to my mail.

I never received this mail.
I opted out of the PLUS plan in the preference settings last week but my images are still in the PLUS plan.
Now I see from reading the comments here that this is for future uploads.
I tried selecting a page of images and edited them by removing the Plus option but it didn't work.
I will write them but if they don't reply is there any other way to remove my images from this free plan.

If there isn't I will delete them.

I might have missed something but my payment for July is less that what it should have been.
The sum in the total payments is less than the sum in the total earnings. Everything is right for all other months.
Do you know their current mail for contributors? And if they are responding.

How do we upload InDesign templates on Adobe Stock.
I see they offer some but I can't find information on selling them.
Or is this a separate thing?

This came up in my FB feed. I suppose this is from the paid collection.
Everything will be free soon or at least will be so cheap that you won't be able to make anything.
It seems the only option will be with curated sites where the images are selected.

Quote from: Mir on October 17, 2020, 16:35

What is the certificate of tax residence they are requesting?

I wrote to them about that; a US certificate cost as much as SF owed me.  I was told not to sweat it, that a copy of your ID with an address would suffice.  In my case they didn't even require that much.  They put the payment request in for m and I got the money a few days later.

Thanks, I received my payment.