MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Morphart

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20
426
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Sales Balance not Updating?!
« on: April 01, 2011, 14:43 »
That is a pretty long dry spell. You might want to log off and search for your images just to make sure they are visible.

Still, sometimes there are long dry spells (at least outside of the top sellers). Good luck, I hope it picks up.

LOL I just LOVE your Forum avatar image PancakeTom ;) Just a great picture illustrating us microstocker hehe! :)

427
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Sales Balance not Updating?!
« on: March 29, 2011, 12:13 »
Had about 20 sales in the last month (march) so no just think your images hasn't been sold ;(.

There is not constants in microstock, some day you can sell 0 images, and other days you can sell 10. It should pick back up in good time.

428
Illustration - General / Re: Best selling VECTOR sites?
« on: March 20, 2011, 09:54 »
For my part it looks like:

1. Shutterstock
2. Istock
3. CANSTOCK.. yes Canstock! :)
4. Dreamstime
5. Fotolia
6. Bigstock
7. 123rf
8. Veer
9. Crestock
10. Stockfresh

429
Well,
personally i am dissapointed with canstockphoto. I just have only one or two sales a mont with my 370 vector images and the sales aren't growing at all. i've earned only 30 dollars during last year. I've just stopped uploading my vectors there.
 Another feature that i don't like here - that canstockphoto creates image preview themselves, automatically.  That's why my vector images preview are low quality and looks really bad. Moreover, if i use the " zoom in" feature  for my images - the view gets terrible - the shapes get jaggy, the colours are a little bit different from what it should be. In other agencies, where i upload my own jpeg image for preview, i don't face this problem.

Make sure your EPS files are RGB and not CMYK. I face some issue with other sites which did this and I noticed that the files which had a lot of color difference and made them look bad were uploaded as CMYK.

It might not be this, but it might be worthwhile to check,

430
Veer / Re: How is veer with vectors?
« on: March 19, 2011, 06:57 »
I am have been a Veer contributor from January. Only uploaded 50 vector right now and I am selling 1 vector per month, with a 7.00$ earning each so the return is pretty interesting, I just might need to upload all my portfolio.

431
General Stock Discussion / Re: Feb 2011
« on: March 10, 2011, 10:06 »
I think I really need to start a parody microstock business; my mind keeps doing all these shots as a parody.

Haha by seeing the posts here it would DEFINETLY work... You should edit this post someone will steal your idea :P

432
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Can Stock Blowing Up!
« on: March 10, 2011, 10:02 »
Canstock definitely sold itself today as a place I will be uploading more to in the future. Just got one of those 19.80 (medium size) sales from Fotosearch. If this keeps up it will knock Dreamstime down to #5 on my list.

Yes a 19.80$ sale commission definetly put a smile on our faces :)

433
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia rocks!!!
« on: March 10, 2011, 10:01 »
A stellar worldclass Agency.

WHAT??? ::) ::) ::)

He got paid to say that :)

434
Photo Critique / Re: Futrue iStock Submission Pic
« on: March 10, 2011, 09:59 »
Technically speaking we might need to see the image larger (with a watermark), the depth of field seems shallow and maybe only half the tennis ball is in focus, that might be another issue (but I am not an experience photographer so don't take my word for it). ;p

435
Well, i think i won't risk with this safe and other illustrations and i will try to create something new :)
By the way, i didn't know, that In istock forum their revievers are writing advices and comments. I thought there are discussions only among contributors. so writing post there is really good idea. Thanks ;)

SOME are, but mostly there is always a highly experience forum moderator which would count for the same, so yes it might be a good idea posting in their photo critique or Illutration thread. I had quite a few good answers there. Good luck!

436
hi Morphart,
thanks for advices ;)
P.S. i liked Your illustrations. really beautiful ;)

Thanks!

I like your Safe Illustration. Maybe make it look like a true steel lock, add a bit of 3d or perspective to it to make it stand out from the backgroud. Maybe a few highlights in the background also but I think it can devellop to a nice Illustration with a few tweaks. If it's good enough for iStock creativity-wise I am not well placed to say since I am a new contributor there.

Your best bet would be to ask for critique at iStock forums. Reviewers go there and they can give you the insight you need from the "inside" so you will stand a lot more chance with the reviewers opinion. :)

437
General Stock Discussion / Re: VettaImages.com ?
« on: March 08, 2011, 15:26 »
I'm thinking of starting a site called iBigCanDreamstime. 

Nan that won't work... Think big..!

I Can... Big Time!  iCanBigTime.com !

Who wants to register? :)

438
General Stock Discussion / Re: VettaImages.com ?
« on: March 07, 2011, 11:13 »
I might be a iStock "new" site for their vetta images?

439
General Stock Discussion / Re: Feb 2011
« on: March 07, 2011, 11:11 »
I am certainly doing the wildlife photography for love; I am putting the time into getting the images on the microstock sites for money.  Sometimes, it is difficult to concentrate on the love part when you are hungry!

Time to get those animals some business suits lol! :)

Hey, there is a good idea.  A bear and a Tiger shaking hands; three bears around a conference table discussing business matters,  or a bear holding a weigh scale and looking back over her shoulder (aka Yuri)

Haha!! :) Good luck with making that bear sign a model release :p. You gave me a good laugh this morning... a Yuri Bear !

440
General Stock Discussion / Re: Feb 2011
« on: March 06, 2011, 20:33 »
I am certainly doing the wildlife photography for love; I am putting the time into getting the images on the microstock sites for money.  Sometimes, it is difficult to concentrate on the love part when you are hungry!

Time to get those animals some business suits lol! :)

441
Hi Archibald.

I think the last one has a "strong" yet already used a lot stock subject. That would be the best out of the pick, but you may need to move it up a notch.

If it can help you, I just passed the application a few weeks ago, having a similar issue with the time they give you in between (was up to 1 month and didn't want to have to wait 3 months or so to get my application approved).

Here are the images that got me accepted, all three at the same time. I tried to use different themes which may have helped:
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=15760933
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=15760963
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=15767358

Let us know how it goes for you and show us the ones that were accepted, along with other ideas you might have, you'll get in! :P

442
Adobe Stock / Re: Earnings per sale
« on: March 06, 2011, 13:56 »
The proof that matters to me -- money in my pocket -- is looking great.

I like that sentence :p. After all, it's the end results that counts I guess. Wheter it's 1000$ from 500 sales or 1000$ from 2000 ;p

443
Adobe Stock / Re: Earnings per sale
« on: March 06, 2011, 08:44 »
Year 2009: 1.08$
Year 2010: 0.78$
2011 so fare: 0.90$

Mostly Illustrations here.

444
General Stock Discussion / Re: Feb 2011 microstock earnings
« on: March 05, 2011, 13:12 »
For my part I am happy with my month.

I have been increasing my portfolio since January, and the number adds up. Made 90$ more than usual in january (added around 50 illustrations during the month), and made 125$ more than January in February (with another 50 illustrations and photos added during the month). Can't really compare with last year, but currently I am happy with the sales, but some like Dreamstime and Fotolia sure are now adding up as they should.

Canstock is the best surprise for me with 70$ sales in February for a portfolio of around 350-375 illustrations and a few images during the month.

Dreamstime and Fotolia are doing bad for me, less than last years sale but with twise as much images online. 123rf and bigstock stayed similar, low sale.

The rest looks like:

Shutter: 155$
Canstock: 70$
Dreamstime: 19.29$
Veer: 7$ (only 40 images online there)
123rf: 11.93$
Fotolia: 13.13$ (eh..!)
Bigtstock: 7.50$
CreStock: 4.95$

The rest are cents or a few dollars :p

445
General Stock Discussion / Re: Who copied whom?
« on: March 05, 2011, 09:37 »
Microstock lives of copying. Not that I like it...I got angry like a million times about someone who was copying my stuff.

For most subject, commercially speaking, they have all been covered. What makes a picture using the same subject and object is sometimes, just the model, lighting and angle. All the subjects we use are all a copy of one that was already created, it's just in the way that we treat it that we can make it "different". Every illustrator or artist has his style, some with photography.

447
General Stock Discussion / Re: Feb 2011
« on: March 05, 2011, 09:33 »
i somewhat agree.  My numbers are so bad it will make anyone look better compared to mine.

I just left Dreamstime exclusive at mid-month. 
Dreamstime at about $70, down from $125  (1000 images online)
the rest based on 15 days of being active (ranging from 19 images to 700 images online)
Shutterstock at about $33
Veer at 3.50
Fotolia at 2.00
DepositPhotos at 0.60
all others (14 of them including IS) at a big whopping zero

Wow with 1k images online it must hurt to only see 70$ for a whoe month. I am surprised you are not getting more sales off that many images, Shutterstock usually pay good money when you have a large portfolio.

448
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Can Stock Blowing Up!
« on: March 04, 2011, 20:54 »
I like the occasional decent sale they get from fotosearch but the sub prices are still one of the lowest at 25 cents....that has really got to go up to a minimum of 33 cents to be more in tune with other sites like shutterstock.  Really an easy site to upload to and fast review times. My only complaint is extremely low sub commissions, I just can't bring myself to be okay with getting 25 cents in return for allowing someone to use my image royalty-free, if that went up I would recommend them as my number one favorite site.

Well for me, I only have a few 25 cents and a LOT of 5$ and some 19.80$. I don't mind selling a few for 25 cents when I can get that much return for other downloads. 25 cents is what you get when starting at Shutterstock (but of course Shutter generates a lot more sales also).

449
Wow you guys here are really helpful, I'm taking all your tips and will be going forward with this. Will start with the lighting as this is where I lack the most experience, I do know the effects of ISO and shutterspeed (this is the same for video camera), but I am still struggling a bit with the aperture, which I know is the opening left in your lens to let the light through, but I don't quite grasp yet how it affects the depth of field and/or the overall quality of the photo, nor how to change the apperture...

In hindsight one thing I regret is not getting a larger MP camera much sooner. File sizes aren't that big a deal if your independent, but if you ever switch to being exclusive it becomes extremely important. 

If you're treating microstock as a business, then equipment isn't the place to start saving money.

Put it this way - an 18MP camera costs about $600. If this investment doesn't pay off over the course of 12-18 months, then there's zero chance of actually making a living out of stock as is the OP's intention.   


For the equipment thing I understand. Someone bright once said to me: We are too poor to buy bad equipment!, always liked that saying :p.

But I was just wondering if instead of going halfway to 18mp I should wait a bit longer and make the leap to a professionnal body. With my current earnings it would only take 2 months of stock earnings to pay for this, which might actually be worth it :p. I have a lot of "food for thoughts" here :)

Quote
Funny, there must be some kind of automatic replacement in place. Try writing F T (without space).


LoL did not notice this hehe! I wrote F T , no I didn't buy any Fotolia lens :p.

Quote
Posted by: jamirae
Insert Quote
some good pointers here.

I also started with a canon digital rebel (way back -- I think it was the first digital rebel version).

I would have to say the two biggest things in terms of equipment would your lighting and your glass (lenses).   When I went from the Rebel to the 20d I noticed difference in quality of the images (slightly better sensor), but when I acquired better lenses, ditching the "kit lens" and getting high-rated lenses I noticed a definite quality improvement.  Maybe the kit lenses are getting better these days, but I would highly recommend making sure you have good glass. Check out dpreview.com or other online places for detailed reviews and you can always rent good lenses if money is an issue or if you want to "try before you buy"  (I use borrowlenses.com or prophotorental.com but there are others).

Also, when I switched to the fullframe 5D there was a very noticeable improvement in the technical quality of my images. (that's what I'm using now - it's not the Mark II version -- saving up for that one still).

Lighting.  If you're going to do indoor shots you need to have some good lights. You can get some great lights from Paul C BUff (www.alienbees.com) - I would recommend getting at least a b800.  You can also do quite a bit with a few flashes - I often use two Canon 580EX flashes for fill-light outdoors and even for smaller subjects/objects indoors/studio.

Also already mentioned -- check out some photography books.  there are some great books on stock photography as well as working with models/people. I have a bunch of photography books on everything from composition, lighting, models, landscapes, monochrome, art, etc.. pretty much every subject related to photography. "never stop learning" is my motto! 


Yes this is my starter kit lens as I didn't know enough about lenses to feel confident buying 1k $ ones :). But I do see the limitations my lens have in less lighting, which is annoying. I hate taking pictures with the "body" Flash of the camera as it's the best way to screw up a photo, but doing some reading I found there are external Flash and lighting to help with that.

I bought a few book, one about creating your lighting for indoor, and a few about stock photography, but I really need to get in the technicallity of it all :p Will check dpreview.com, and more so I will start shooting with a different eye ;p. Most shooting (photo) contracts I had was for clients which I was to use the picture for their website and some small size print, so I always thought my pictures were great... that's until I try to submit a few at Shutterstock. :)

Thanks everyone for sharing your experience with me, it will "speed up" my learning process by giving me good cues from experience photographers!

450
But yes, in "iStock light" you'll probably be OK. Guess if you're using ISO with lights in a studio, you'll be fine.

Thanks! I don't plan on stick to the "rebel" in the long term but for the learning process of getting all the required technicality right I think it's a good starter.

Photo and video certainly does not have the same issues and requirements! :p

Thanks again everyone!

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors