|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - hose
Pages: [1]
1
« on: May 11, 2011, 04:30 »
since february I have drastic drop down on sales
how about the others?
2
« on: March 29, 2011, 14:43 »
I'm sorry but my experience shows that his way of speaking and his attitude as a whole is...  and this is a problem at all sites - for sure
3
« on: March 29, 2011, 09:09 »
they have enough ways to "improve" the collections - they have the level based system which is making like selection for the buyers - and there are other ways to push the good photos up - which they think would sell more
if a photo has no technical problems it is purely stupid to reject it
I agree for this guy Serban - he has absolutely bad attitude and should be removed
4
« on: March 26, 2011, 15:37 »
digitalexpressionimages - absolutely!
cclapper - if you want to change just the size or license of image you already bought, it could be made as an option and I believe it is not complicated to do it, and just to take a little more credits
5
« on: March 26, 2011, 08:25 »
fotografer - unfortunately it's not occasional
delphinium - for the missing 0.10 $ my best guess is the tax
6
« on: March 24, 2011, 09:06 »
really?!
usually you could answer as a comment on a picture
7
« on: March 24, 2011, 09:04 »
you never know what someone could need - that's the truth
and all this restrictions are...
8
« on: March 12, 2011, 14:29 »
actually I don't see much sense in this...
maybe for the travel photos... but for the isolated objects I don't see sense to know the GPS coordinates and I wouldn't waste time to input them
9
« on: March 12, 2011, 14:26 »
I was thinking these days...
many said that they wouldn't sell RAW for these prices
ok... so what is the normal price for RAW?
what do you think
10
« on: March 03, 2011, 14:52 »
someone knows what happened in the end?
11
« on: February 23, 2011, 06:08 »
after the "make-up" you lose information that a designer could need and anyway - the next morning after the date - everything is clear 
12
« on: February 22, 2011, 08:49 »
sure we have choice - to upload or not  everyone decides for himself
13
« on: February 21, 2011, 11:13 »
why do you think that RAW files are so precious? I don't get it...
It's the same if you sell JPEG or RAW for me...
but I have a lot of images on my web site which are originally made on slide films and they are really ART... and I don't upload them at stock sites... recently I even disable more than 20 files that I was upload years ago... I just decided these files worth much more
but all the others... are just stock... and wheather it's jpeg or raw... the same for me
14
« on: February 21, 2011, 03:45 »
they try to keep their database compact... but still you never know what the client will need
15
« on: February 21, 2011, 03:38 »
on one hand it's like this... but on the other - I think it's fair to give the designers all options - you don't know what they need... and how they will need it... so giving them the RAW you give them all options
about the price - when they buy with credits it's much higher, but with subscriptions is very low...
16
« on: February 20, 2011, 17:29 »
someone knows?
17
« on: February 15, 2011, 06:58 »
Nikon D700 is 12 mp
18
« on: February 13, 2011, 09:02 »
RacePhoto - absolutely
I think people should read a little bit more about composition...
you never know what the designer will need and want - but there is a very big chance to be more usable now
and if the object is displayed full size - this is the highest resolution possible - no matter if I crop the white on the right or not - the apple stays the same
19
« on: February 12, 2011, 14:29 »
the explanation is stupid because it's impossible to shoot on a white background (or any other) and not to leave space - of course we are talking about normal shooting when the object is placed normaly - what they are talking about is something else - for extreme cases when the object is very very small....
20
« on: February 12, 2011, 09:40 »
recently I got this one - Please don\'t use that much blank space in pictures with isolated subjects (sample text messages don\'t count as content). Being an isolated subject, the buyers can add blank space as much as they need after downloading. For more informations visit this link http://blog.dreamstime.com/2010/09/08/whitespace-that-should-not-be-white_art33344 .Thank you. Definitely this is the stupidest ever!!!  )
21
« on: February 09, 2011, 03:17 »
yeah... right... west of Berlin the torrent sites doesn't work... crap
people steal everywhere - the only difference is that at some places they are caught
as I live in eastern europe I know very well what are you talking about, but still there are plenty of good people here also
22
« on: February 08, 2011, 03:59 »
Actually I experience a very serious decrease in sales after all this happened
So this leads to the obvious conclusion that pixmac were selling very good indeed
But there is something more... several months ago I had the same problems like contributors now in IS - they withdraw money from my account several times, and after a lot of mails and talking they told me that someone for some reason attacked ONLY me.... which is ridiculous... they even suspect me in buying my own photos with false credit cards...
anyway - I guess all the problems were caused by this caching system
23
« on: January 26, 2011, 04:34 »
the hard truth that I've been writting so many times is that we as contributors don't have ANY control of what is going on behind the scenes
the only reason all this to come up now is that one agency is stealing from another
if an agency is stealing - we can't make an audit
Pages: [1]
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
