51
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock reviewers are idiots
« on: October 19, 2019, 16:01 »
They are never implemented consistently and every site has its own rules. What is difficult is when they raise the standards with no reason. Example picture of Bougainvillea. Prior photos of bougainvilleas accepted with no problem. flower rejected because wrong title. Reviewer sees foreign word and rejects. Finally able to get it approved by specifically stating the scientific name is.
Recent rejection of Apotheosis in US Capitol as non licensable content. Painting done in 1800s in a public building and is clearly in the public domain.
Many other sites have already accepted the photos but SS has decided to arbitrarily reject it.
All signs that SS has decided to reject more photos and that is not a good sign.
Recent rejection of Apotheosis in US Capitol as non licensable content. Painting done in 1800s in a public building and is clearly in the public domain.
Many other sites have already accepted the photos but SS has decided to arbitrarily reject it.
All signs that SS has decided to reject more photos and that is not a good sign.