I have had a couple of my photos rejected (SS, Adobe, iStock) requiring a property release.  I have had plenty of my photos accepted that are similar in nature.

Here's the situation.  The buildings I have shot aren't well known or "famous", I am not trespassing on the property itself (taken from the road) and these aren't people's private homes.  There are no names on these buildings or trademarks.

The agencies are super inconsistent in their review.  What's the deal?  What are your thoughts/suggestions?

Thank you for your feedback.  Yes, I assumed eggs were common.  I have a couple of photos on my hens and goats out there, too. 

I need to train my goats to sit still.  Right now every time I put my camera to my face, they come right up to the lens thinking its a snack.  (why else would our human put something up to her face, if not to eat it?)  Blurry goat nose photos won't sell!

While I have been taking pictures forever, I just started trying my luck with micro stock.  A bit of background:  I work as a software designer in IT but live on a hobby farm in Wisconsin.  Much of what I photo is related to our farm and surrounding areas.  (photograph what you know, right?) 

I would like to get some constructive feedback from folks here. 

This is just one sample. 

The fact that in their official corporate communication they cannot formulate a proper sentence in English automatically disqualifies them for me.